stevedog1980 wrote:I can't blame Duhan for moving on if he has an offer that he can't ignore but does this not leave a sour taste for some people? I'm fine with players qualifying on residency and the raising of the bar to 5 years will help but for a newly available and newly capped international to move on it doesn't exactly show the sense of loyalty and belonging that people have claimed residency qualification brings.
I know we are the beneficiary here, having a true international quality winger available to us now but it just doesn't sit right.
To be honest, I'm just being consistent with my view point on this. I thought the same way when Riki Flutey went off to France and the circumstances here seem very similar. Just because the shoe is on our foot now, I can't easily change my view on how mercenary this feels
No sour taste for me, but then I live in the real world where players have rugby as a career, not a hobby
Players who move half way round the world, sometimes on their own but sometimes uprooting family as well, to spend several years here are making quite a commitment IMHO. Not all become stars and big earners. Those who do then have a short career. If you were offered double your salary to move, would you, or would you show loyalty because your current employer had been good to you. We need to consider the player as a "worker" not a relic of 30 or 40 years ago
perhaps if you appreciated what it takes to move half way round the world to get a job, then be basically invalided out of it, be lucky get a second chance then realise at 25 (26 this year) you may not have that many years left to maximise your income - life changing income, you'd get the point.
When we sign guys like these, we know exactly what the score is. There is risk as well as reward. If you look from an SRU perspective, obviously they don't want to weaken our teams, but OTOH, we have again broadened the player base we have to chose from. I have yet to hear an argument that says we don't need to do that.