6/2 splitBanquo wrote:what does 'stack the pack' mean?p/d wrote:Stack the pack, get the 9/10 to keep oppo on back foot. Fliers either side of Steward and let the centres work on the lyrics for next years Eurovision entry.
We need to beat them up and kick the life out of the game. If nothing else we can reignite the dislike for us along with the Mexican Wave
Australia vs England - First Test
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14576
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Sounds like it has the makings of a quality game show.p/d wrote:6/2 splitBanquo wrote:what does 'stack the pack' mean?p/d wrote:Stack the pack, get the 9/10 to keep oppo on back foot. Fliers either side of Steward and let the centres work on the lyrics for next years Eurovision entry.
We need to beat them up and kick the life out of the game. If nothing else we can reignite the dislike for us along with the Mexican Wave
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Why is there the persisting belief that England can select a pack that will dominate the opposition, when they clearly can't.p/d wrote:Stack the pack, get the 9/10 to keep oppo on back foot. Fliers either side of Steward and let the centres work on the lyrics for next years Eurovision entry.
We need to beat them up and kick the life out of the game. If nothing else we can reignite the dislike for us along with the Mexican Wave
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Not suggesting for a moment we can. More a comment to what Jones’ game plan should be over the next x amount of games. In respect of the next test I can only assume we will repeat the tactics of last week praying Aus keep 15 on the pitchSpiffy wrote:Why is there the persisting belief that England can select a pack that will dominate the opposition, when they clearly can't.p/d wrote:Stack the pack, get the 9/10 to keep oppo on back foot. Fliers either side of Steward and let the centres work on the lyrics for next years Eurovision entry.
We need to beat them up and kick the life out of the game. If nothing else we can reignite the dislike for us along with the Mexican Wave
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Probably because most of them have, in happier times, all been part of excellent forward packs that have performed to an extremely high level, both for club, country and the Lions.Spiffy wrote:Why is there the persisting belief that England can select a pack that will dominate the opposition, when they clearly can't.p/d wrote:Stack the pack, get the 9/10 to keep oppo on back foot. Fliers either side of Steward and let the centres work on the lyrics for next years Eurovision entry.
We need to beat them up and kick the life out of the game. If nothing else we can reignite the dislike for us along with the Mexican Wave
-
- Posts: 19272
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
or a bad divorce settlementMellsblue wrote:Sounds like it has the makings of a quality game show.p/d wrote:6/2 splitBanquo wrote: what does 'stack the pack' mean?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14576
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Banquo wrote:or a bad divorce settlementMellsblue wrote:Sounds like it has the makings of a quality game show.p/d wrote: 6/2 split

-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.Raggs wrote:
Shows the attacking patterns quite nicely. Working the wingers hard to make sure they're constantly options, expecting them to clear out when it's their pod being used etc. All doing all jobs. The kick at the end I thought was a bad choice, since both wingers were involved in a ruck just one phase earlier, but I'd completely forgotten about Steward.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Interestingly, though, if Nowell was a better player, that ended in a try.Timbo wrote:All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.Raggs wrote:
Shows the attacking patterns quite nicely. Working the wingers hard to make sure they're constantly options, expecting them to clear out when it's their pod being used etc. All doing all jobs. The kick at the end I thought was a bad choice, since both wingers were involved in a ruck just one phase earlier, but I'd completely forgotten about Steward.
-
- Posts: 8522
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Would you also say if Smith was a better player and throws the wide pass to Steward we could score a try a lot earlier?Stom wrote:Interestingly, though, if Nowell was a better player, that ended in a try.Timbo wrote:All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.Raggs wrote:
Shows the attacking patterns quite nicely. Working the wingers hard to make sure they're constantly options, expecting them to clear out when it's their pod being used etc. All doing all jobs. The kick at the end I thought was a bad choice, since both wingers were involved in a ruck just one phase earlier, but I'd completely forgotten about Steward.
-
- Posts: 19272
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
yep, I commented as such earlier. Its a lot of work and tasking to get not very far. Need to play instinctively once you are over the gainline imo- I do like planning the strike moves well, and setting up support/runners, but in a more flexible way---tbh, this kind of support play is instinctive to say the kiwis- arrowhead running back in the day. The upside is that at least someone is putting a lot of thought into what we are doing...even if the overall strategy is lacking and the execution too difficult/out of our skill set.Timbo wrote:All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.Raggs wrote:
Shows the attacking patterns quite nicely. Working the wingers hard to make sure they're constantly options, expecting them to clear out when it's their pod being used etc. All doing all jobs. The kick at the end I thought was a bad choice, since both wingers were involved in a ruck just one phase earlier, but I'd completely forgotten about Steward.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14576
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Do you have the still/screen grab of this?FKAS wrote:Would you also say if Smith was a better player and throws the wide pass to Steward we could score a try a lot earlier?Stom wrote:Interestingly, though, if Nowell was a better player, that ended in a try.Timbo wrote:
All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.
-
- Posts: 19272
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
That's not a still, that's Freddie at full paceMellsblue wrote:Do you have the still/screen grab of this?FKAS wrote:Would you also say if Smith was a better player and throws the wide pass to Steward we could score a try a lot earlier?Stom wrote:
Interestingly, though, if Nowell was a better player, that ended in a try.
(just kiddin Tigers lads

-
- Posts: 8522
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
1.47 on the Twitter link. Apologies it's Nowell out wide and not Steward. It was more a point about Nowell getting unfair flack when he actually played alright.Banquo wrote:That's not a still, that's Freddie at full paceMellsblue wrote:Do you have the still/screen grab of this?FKAS wrote:
Would you also say if Smith was a better player and throws the wide pass to Steward we could score a try a lot earlier?
(just kiddin Tigers lads)
-
- Posts: 19272
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Nowell always plays 'all right' when he isn't missing his oppo one on one. He's an ok player when fit. He's just not what you want from a top class intl winger imo. He did a great offload though, notable because he actually let go of the ball in a gameFKAS wrote:1.47 on the Twitter link. Apologies it's Nowell out wide and not Steward. It was more a point about Nowell getting unfair flack when he actually played alright.Banquo wrote:That's not a still, that's Freddie at full paceMellsblue wrote: Do you have the still/screen grab of this?
(just kiddin Tigers lads)


-
- Posts: 12206
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
The pass was definitely on, though I guess not a huge amount of time to make the call. Would have been interesting to see how far Nowell got with it. I read his stats were very good but can’t remember much of him beyond that mad basketball pass to Marchant.
-
- Posts: 19272
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Nowell is full of energy when not injured, but more often than not intly it leads to little.Mikey Brown wrote:The pass was definitely on, though I guess not a huge amount of time to make the call. Would have been interesting to see how far Nowell got with it. I read his stats were very good but can’t remember much of him beyond that mad basketball pass to Marchant.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
Personally think the opportunity is if Cokanasiga gives the pass earlier, rather than taking contact and offloading.Stom wrote:Interestingly, though, if Nowell was a better player, that ended in a try.Timbo wrote:All looks extremely prescribed and over coached to me. 4 times in just one clip they attempt to go wide with the play out the back to Smith and only one of those did they actually earn the right through getting an initial carry over the gainline- the strike move from the lineout with the Billy carry.Raggs wrote:
Shows the attacking patterns quite nicely. Working the wingers hard to make sure they're constantly options, expecting them to clear out when it's their pod being used etc. All doing all jobs. The kick at the end I thought was a bad choice, since both wingers were involved in a ruck just one phase earlier, but I'd completely forgotten about Steward.
That bit comes from good kick pressure, then winning the ball back and playing to space quickly. But that’s the sort of rugby our game was based on a few years ago and nobody seems to want that anymore really.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
This.Banquo wrote:Nowell always plays 'all right' when he isn't missing his oppo one on one. He's an ok player when fit. He's just not what you want from a top class intl winger imo. He did a great offload though, notable because he actually let go of the ball in a gameFKAS wrote:1.47 on the Twitter link. Apologies it's Nowell out wide and not Steward. It was more a point about Nowell getting unfair flack when he actually played alright.Banquo wrote:
That's not a still, that's Freddie at full pace
(just kiddin Tigers lads)
![]()
He’s just the player who puts up all the numbers. He just doesn’t score or assist as he’s not quick enough nor a good enough passer both technically and in vision.
Either he has the pace to get past Kellaway there, and we score, or he has the passing ability to find his outside man, and we score. As it is, he’s too slow, gets scragged, and passes behind Marchant.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Australia vs England - First Test
You are right. But Nowell has played like this since he first appeared on the scene. Yet Jones keeps on picking him. He likes his dog, determination and total enthusiasm but at international level that's not quite enough.Stom wrote:This.Banquo wrote:Nowell always plays 'all right' when he isn't missing his oppo one on one. He's an ok player when fit. He's just not what you want from a top class intl winger imo. He did a great offload though, notable because he actually let go of the ball in a gameFKAS wrote:
1.47 on the Twitter link. Apologies it's Nowell out wide and not Steward. It was more a point about Nowell getting unfair flack when he actually played alright.![]()
He’s just the player who puts up all the numbers. He just doesn’t score or assist as he’s not quick enough nor a good enough passer both technically and in vision.
Either he has the pace to get past Kellaway there, and we score, or he has the passing ability to find his outside man, and we score. As it is, he’s too slow, gets scragged, and passes behind Marchant.