Snap General Election called

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Yaay. My spectacularly milquetoast MP is now the Minister for Education. Her qualifications are the same as the reason I don't like her - she has never once voted or spoken against anything the government has ever done, despite having been an MP under three very different Tory leaderships.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Oh, excellent! :lol:
capture2.jpg
For context, Lucy Allan is a Conservative MP.

Puja
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Puja on Wed Jul 06, 2022 2:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Backist Monk
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Puja wrote:Yaay. My spectacularly milquetoast MP is now the Minister for Education. Her qualifications are the same as the reason I don't like her - she has never once voted or spoken against anything the government has ever done, despite having been an MP under three very different Tory leaderships.

Puja
This is the way to success. Don’t rock the boat and mod at the right times. Never take any risks. Works in many walks of life.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

She is the 7th education secretary in 8 years. That’s utterly appalling. Arguably education should be one of the top offices.

She also wanted to be an MP at the age of 6. I felt no need to read further as that alone should disqualify her from any public office.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Which Tyler »

27 resignations in 21 hours
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5743
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Looks like they shot their load too quick...

A Tory party led by Javid or Dishy Rishi is far more likely to win the next election...
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Tostado Borissimo. Gove has spoken.
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1922
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Zhivago »

Sandydragon wrote:Allegedly Boris wanted Truss to be chancellor but Zahawi threatened to quit if he didn’t get it. Boris is literally hanging on by the finger tips.

But I have a feeling he will survive. Unless some more big names step down tomorrow then he can continue and ride out the next year (assuming the 1922 doesn’t change the rules and there are no motions of no confidence that Tory MPs support).
My guess is his backbenchers will revolt against him and he'll threaten/launch an election if they don't toe the line.

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15725
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mellsblue »

Zhivago wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:Allegedly Boris wanted Truss to be chancellor but Zahawi threatened to quit if he didn’t get it. Boris is literally hanging on by the finger tips.

But I have a feeling he will survive. Unless some more big names step down tomorrow then he can continue and ride out the next year (assuming the 1922 doesn’t change the rules and there are no motions of no confidence that Tory MPs support).
My guess is his backbenchers will revolt against him and he'll threaten/launch an election if they don't toe the line.
The backbenchers have already revolted. Look in to the numbers of the no confidence vote, strip out those on the payroll, ie ministers, and the numbers are stark.
Greebo
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:35 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Greebo »

Which Tyler wrote:27 resignations in 21 hours
#WorldBeating
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4461
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote:She is the 7th education secretary in 8 years. That’s utterly appalling. Arguably education should be one of the top offices.

She also wanted to be an MP at the age of 6. I felt no need to read further as that alone should disqualify her from any public office.
It would be if the position was responsible for educating Tory MP's kids. It isn't.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »



Outstanding.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Which Tyler »

Puja wrote:

Outstanding.

Puja
Just coming in to post the same thing
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Please let Boris call an election in a fit of pique. Please.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:Please let Boris call an election in a fit of pique. Please.

Puja
Its not beyond the bounds of possibility. Almost certainly would become indyref2, which would be....interesting. Then SKS gets a Fixed Pen Notice. Ay caramba
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

It’s one of those days where I can’t get enough of BBC News 24! Will he, won’t he? Popcorn anyone?
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Banquo »

Sandydragon wrote:It’s one of those days where I can’t get enough of BBC News 24! Will he, won’t he? Popcorn anyone?
except Rome is burning and Nero is fiddling
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11967
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Mikey Brown »

I’m so confused. Even if he goes he’s just going to replaced by some equally awful piece of shit, while Starmer continues to just exist and little more. Everything will continue to be terrible forever, right?

What are you all so hopeful of happening here? Don’t get me wrong I wish all the misfortune in the world on Johnson, but what of significance is likely to change here?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Mikey Brown wrote:I’m so confused. Even if he goes he’s just going to replaced by some equally awful piece of shit, while Starmer continues to just exist and little more. Everything will continue to be terrible forever, right?

What are you all so hopeful of happening here? Don’t get me wrong I wish all the misfortune in the world on Johnson, but what of significance is likely to change here?
This was my thought process earlier in the thread:
Puja wrote:I'm somewhat torn about the no-confidence vote.

On the one hand, Boris Johnson may be the least competent Prime Minister in living memory. He has no morals, no principles, lies with such ease and frequency that it's hard to tell if he's actively and maliciously deceiving or just saying what seems easiest and most populist to him at the time to keep people liking him, regardless of whether it has any basis in fact. He's a man with such a frightening combination of low wisdom and high ego that, as foreign minister, he couldn't be stopped from showing off that he'd memorised "The Bells of Mandalay" (a Kipling poem glorying the British Empire's conquering of then Burma, now Myan Mar, by the motif of a British soldier reminiscing on the Burmese girl he'd fucked and how she still wanted him), while on a state visit to one of the most sacred temples in Myan Mar, despite the ambassador literally standing next to him saying, "Not a good idea, Boris." He *kept* *going* despite someone telling him not to, because he wanted to show off a thing he knew! He has so many flaws that I can't even fit them into one post.

Surely, by that metric, the country is better with him gone as quickly as possible.

On the other hand, the Conservative party as a whole is a blight on the UK right now - more interested in stoking culture wars to hang onto power than abiding by any principles that they might lay claim to, and the sheer possibility of Liz Truss or Priti Patel taking over makes my blood run cold. Is it better to hope that Boris wins, continues to blunder, and the country votes the whole lot of them out at the next election?

Two and a half years is a long time though, both in terms of the damage that Boris could do (especially in throwing red meat policies at his base to try and win back favour), and in terms of Boris's incredible ability to avoid consequences and win public favour despite his dizzying list of inadequacies. He wins this and he could end up not only fucking the country for another 2.5 years, but 7.5 years and longer.

I think, from my thoughts in typing this out, it's better to hope to have him go now. Better the bird in the hand and the hope that someone slightly better will take control (as the best of a bad bunch, I'd take Sajid Javid, although (almost) anyone'd be better than Truss).
Boris going won't make everything all better, but he won't be replaced by an equally awful piece of shit, because I don't believe one exists. Even the people who are worse humans (Patel, for example) are more functional and competent and less aggressively self-centred. At least Patel has ambitions and goals to advance Satan's agenda here on earth; Boris literally cares about nothing other than having power for the sake of having it.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7847
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by morepork »

Well that escalated quickly. What a shambles. Are there any public servants in power that, you know, actually serve the public?
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

morepork wrote:Well that escalated quickly. What a shambles. Are there any public servants in power that, you know, actually serve the public?
Not obviously so, no
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Just a thought. What if Boris tells his MPs to fuck off and before the rules can be changed, goes to the palace and requests parliament be dissolved?

Would the queen agree? Can she not?

If she does, would the Tory MPs have time to elect a new leader? I’d suggest not. The et would have to back him or just refuse to campaign for him.

And what happens if the conservatives have a majority afterwards (not impossible)?

Will Boris roll the dice? Most PMs would do the right thing and step down. But Boris only cares about himself and our constitution can be so very vague at times.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10091
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Boris ain’t quitting. He’s just sacked Gove.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Sandydragon wrote:Just a thought. What if Boris tells his MPs to fuck off and before the rules can be changed, goes to the palace and requests parliament be dissolved?

Would the queen agree? Can she not?

If she does, would the Tory MPs have time to elect a new leader? I’d suggest not. The et would have to back him or just refuse to campaign for him.

And what happens if the conservatives have a majority afterwards (not impossible)?

Will Boris roll the dice? Most PMs would do the right thing and step down. But Boris only cares about himself and our constitution can be so very vague at times.
I believe the Queen has the right to refuse a dissolution of Parliament and probably would if she saw it as being done just for shenanigans to try and hold onto power. I suspect that it wouldn't get as far as her actually having to refuse him - there'd probably be several layers of flunkies politely intimating to Boris that she would prefer he didn't put her in the situation of having to refuse him with the implication of, "You're not getting it either way, so don't embarrass me or yourself by forcing the issue."
Sandydragon wrote:Boris ain’t quitting. He’s just sacked Gove.
I mean, who can blame him for wanting to sack Gove just on general principles, but is there anyone left to replace him with?!

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply