So retro, they've got Dan Lyle back as a model

Moderator: Puja
Is that real? If so, hell yeah. That's damn good.Which Tyler wrote:Bath have gone retro.
So retro, they've got Dan Lyle back as a model
It's a real new line (I'm very tempted by the gold), but sadly not the playing kit.Stom wrote:Is that real? If so, hell yeah. That's damn good.
It is nice, but it does feel another step along the path to your shirts being mostly red and white with blue accents.jimKRFC wrote:Hoped it wouldn't happen but it has. Bristol not going the retro route:
I quite like it, but didn't take long for the "no hopes hoops, not enough blue, letters" blah blah blah.... to start.
Classic and classy. I'm envious.Adam_P wrote:Saints new kit - quite like it. Can only fault the change of sponsor really, what with TP being an exact colour match - but money's money.
Depends whether Rylan will be making an appearance.Puja wrote:
classy.
Puja
I think from the double thumbs up and toothy smile, he might have possessed Ribbans.Mellsblue wrote:Depends whether Rylan will be making an appearance.Puja wrote:
classy.
Puja
The level of Photoshop on that picture is comparable to a fashion magazine. That being said the kit is clearly a Saints kit with all the right colours and design. I wish the Tigers board would take notice and stop trying reinvent the wheel every sodding season.Puja wrote:I think from the double thumbs up and toothy smile, he might have possessed Ribbans.Mellsblue wrote:Depends whether Rylan will be making an appearance.Puja wrote:
classy.
Puja
Puja
Puja wrote:I think from the double thumbs up and toothy smile, he might have possessed Ribbans.Mellsblue wrote:Depends whether Rylan will be making an appearance.Puja wrote:
classy.
Puja
Puja
This. God only knows what the designer/s of the Bristol one were on. Adult got to do the sleeves a child with little talent the rest.Mikey Brown wrote:Like the Saints one. Hate the Bristol one
Nope...pandion wrote:Have Bristol always had red in the kit, I don't remember it?
Just looks like half Bath half Gloucester. Maybe they hoped they'd pinch a few fans from each.jimKRFC wrote:Nope...pandion wrote:Have Bristol always had red in the kit, I don't remember it?
It's a recent (since moving to Ashton Gate) thing. Not popular with older/traditionalist supporters.
Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.pandion wrote:Just looks like half Bath half Gloucester. Maybe they hoped they'd pinch a few fans from each.jimKRFC wrote:Nope...pandion wrote:Have Bristol always had red in the kit, I don't remember it?
It's a recent (since moving to Ashton Gate) thing. Not popular with older/traditionalist supporters.
Aah yes Bristol Shogun'sPuja wrote:Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.pandion wrote:Just looks like half Bath half Gloucester. Maybe they hoped they'd pinch a few fans from each.jimKRFC wrote:
Nope...
It's a recent (since moving to Ashton Gate) thing. Not popular with older/traditionalist supporters.
That red has gradually been growing and growing and growing, year on year, until eventually it will get to the stage where it's just acknowledged that Bristol's colours are equally blue, red and white, at which point the blue will start shrinking to become the accent.
Puja
Wasn't that because of a sponsorship deal with Mitsubishi?pandion wrote:Aah yes Bristol Shogun'sPuja wrote:Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.pandion wrote: Just looks like half Bath half Gloucester. Maybe they hoped they'd pinch a few fans from each.
That red has gradually been growing and growing and growing, year on year, until eventually it will get to the stage where it's just acknowledged that Bristol's colours are equally blue, red and white, at which point the blue will start shrinking to become the accent.
Pujathat brings back memories, who's awful idea was that? To think of the faf over the Chiefs. Bristol Shogun's would be hilarious.
What would be wrong with encouraging fans to dress up as a stylish and affordable 4x4 that you could drive away today for a low-low-low price?pandion wrote:Aah yes Bristol Shogun'sPuja wrote:Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.pandion wrote: Just looks like half Bath half Gloucester. Maybe they hoped they'd pinch a few fans from each.
That red has gradually been growing and growing and growing, year on year, until eventually it will get to the stage where it's just acknowledged that Bristol's colours are equally blue, red and white, at which point the blue will start shrinking to become the accent.
Pujathat brings back memories, who's awful idea was that? To think of the faf over the Chiefs. Bristol Shogun's would be hilarious.
What a missed opportunity! The Shogun's v the Chiefs..! Where nobody can see anything without standing up. Imagine the chantsPuja wrote:What would be wrong with encouraging fans to dress up as a stylish and affordable 4x4 that you could drive away today for a low-low-low price?pandion wrote:Aah yes Bristol Shogun'sPuja wrote:
Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.
That red has gradually been growing and growing and growing, year on year, until eventually it will get to the stage where it's just acknowledged that Bristol's colours are equally blue, red and white, at which point the blue will start shrinking to become the accent.
Pujathat brings back memories, who's awful idea was that? To think of the faf over the Chiefs. Bristol Shogun's would be hilarious.
Mind, in their favour, Bristol never leaned into it. Just imagine if they'd done an Exeter and decided that that was their brand from here on out? Encouraging fans to dress up in yellow-face and sing ching-chong songs while waving inflatable katanas bought from the gift shop and miming seppuku. Instead they just shilled a few cars and tried to pretend that it never happened while it was happening. Everyone got off lightly there!
Puja
Well a bit murkier than that.... the guy running Bristol rugby (Arthur Holmes) made a load of loans (secured against the land Bristol rugby owned) and sold half of the memorial ground to Rovers. The sell of the ground had a clause that allowed Rovers to buy the other half for £10k if Bristol Rugby went bust. He called in his loans, taking the land (he was a property developer), put the club into receivership and Rovers bought it. At the time, or very shortly afterwards, Arthur Holmes was also on the Rovers board...Puja wrote: Bristol used to share the Memorial Stadium with Bristol Rovers football (who are blue and white and the stadium is blue and white). Bristol then got screwed out of the Memorial by Rovers after some very poor financial planning near the start of professionalism (poor Bristol Shoguns), and were bought out by the guy who owns Bristol City football club (who play in red and white) and moved to Ashton Gate (red stadium). There's been a lot of suspicion since the move that the owner wants both his brands in the same colour set and, while he quelled the backlash at the beginning by saying that *of course* Bristol would stay in blue and white, he wouldn't dream of changing the colours, he's just going to have a wafer thin red accent just to symbolise Ashton Gate, but that's it, blue and white forever.
To be fair the longer term supporters moan each year about letters and hoops. When they have hoops the moan is that don't go all the way round, the ratio of blue:white etc... personally I'm too bothered as their all massively over priced and I won't buy them anyway.Puja wrote: That red has gradually been growing and growing and growing, year on year, until eventually it will get to the stage where it's just acknowledged that Bristol's colours are equally blue, red and white, at which point the blue will start shrinking to become the accent.
Shoguns...FKAS wrote:Wasn't that because of a sponsorship deal with Mitsubishi?pandion wrote: Aah yes Bristol Shogun'sthat brings back memories, who's awful idea was that? To think of the faf over the Chiefs. Bristol Shogun's would be hilarious.
Oh gods, I'd forgotten that your lot had cheerleaders at one point (as did Saracens, IIRC?). What a tawdry period of the game - teams flailing about trying to find hooks into the general public and coming off like a teacher trying to be down with the kids.jimKRFC wrote:The mascot, Mitsu (a samurai), was pretty m'eh but the cheerleaders were dreadful....