Team for Italy

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3427
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:09 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:07 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:04 pm Fckin smith comes on and kaddabis what is going on.

Need to dump Faz.

Ludlam has turned into a very good intl, credit jngf where it’s due.

Jury out on Dombrandt still, but that starting 8 is a good one.

Wide Defence, daft penalties, persistently kicking it away, and handling generally remain issues. Good tight defence and set piece generally- Lawrence, Chessum, Ludlam, Willis and Itoje all had good games; both JVP and Mitchell were fine.
Hard to argue with any of that. Except Dombrandt who has looked awful.

And not just dump Faz but dump this ludicrous kick to score bollocks!

Pack is still lacklustre. Ball presentation still poor. Attacking moves are largely absent. There’s almost no point playing wing.
Jury out for me- he carried well but consistently inconsistent.
Looks more consistent in the latter to me
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Spiffy »

stepsider wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:05 pm What did Farrell actually do apart from a couple of good touch finds (+ missing 2 conversions)?
Several bad tactical kicks.
Missed a few easy close quarter tackles.
Got himself into a fight.
Failed to get the three quarters moving.
stepsider
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2022 5:53 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by stepsider »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:08 pm Wise words from Dallaglio.
What did he say?
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3427
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

You know we’re a bit shit if you’re agreeing with Clive!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:09 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:07 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:04 pm Fckin smith comes on and kaddabis what is going on.

Need to dump Faz.

Ludlam has turned into a very good intl, credit jngf where it’s due.

Jury out on Dombrandt still, but that starting 8 is a good one.

Wide Defence, daft penalties, persistently kicking it away, and handling generally remain issues. Good tight defence and set piece generally- Lawrence, Chessum, Ludlam, Willis and Itoje all had good games; both JVP and Mitchell were fine.
Hard to argue with any of that. Except Dombrandt who has looked awful.

And not just dump Faz but dump this ludicrous kick to score bollocks!

Pack is still lacklustre. Ball presentation still poor. Attacking moves are largely absent. There’s almost no point playing wing.
Jury out for me- he carried well but consistently inconsistent. As said persistently kicking away is killing us.
Agreed. I think he just needs one game where it clicks and he’ll be a good test player but he’s running out of time.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17743
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Puja »

Beasties wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:10 pm Willis, Chessum, Itoje (yaay), Ludlam good. Domnrandt reminds me of le Tissier, looks great at club level then irrelevant at int’l level. Tom Willis just seems a no brainer upgrade to me but hey ho, same situation as Jack so understand why it’s tricky right now. Lawrence was fine but either side of him nowt going on of any significance.

Bench just dragged the whole match down. Negri pick of the Italians.
Ironic that we've finally dropped BillyV when I think he'd be doing a much better job than Dombrandt at what we're now askng our 8 to do.

Puja
Backist Monk
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3427
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

stepsider wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:11 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:08 pm Wise words from Dallaglio.
What did he say?

Nothing ;D
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Mellsblue »

stepsider wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:11 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:08 pm Wise words from Dallaglio.
What did he say?
That it’ll take time to improve as they’re only now getting consistent messages after the high turnover of coaches in the previous regime. Plus consistency in selection rather than random dumping of players, referencing Lawrence.
Danno
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Danno »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:10 pm SCW: too much kicking in the red zone and the captain made a poor decision at the end.
Also SCW: should’ve kept Farrell at 10 for the full 80mins.
Totally avoided his name while criticising him, too.
stepsider
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2022 5:53 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by stepsider »

If Lawrence had been given just a fraction of the game time accorded to Farrell over recent games, reckon he'd now be firmly established at 12. We'd still have OF at 10, though...
francoisfou
Posts: 2524
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: Team for Italy

Post by francoisfou »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:24 pm Kick after boring kick. Might support the French.
Bravo, Mellsbleu!
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3427
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

40 missed tackles. A genuine sign of a new structure. Not too dissimilar to Tigers previously.

Attack. Not so sure.
fivepointer
Posts: 5915
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by fivepointer »

A game that offered some positives alongside a number of negatives.

Some of our attack was laboured and witless. We kicked away far too much ball and seldom strung together the kind of attacking shape that we hinted at last week. I think OHC received one pass.
The subs didnt offer much bar a neatly worked try with Mitchell and Arundell. Mako & Cole were badly exposed for the 2nd Italian try and the others didnt do anything to demand a start next time. At least Walker got on.
Our line out was good and our driving maul much improved. The pack generally went well. Chessum is making the shirt his own, Itoje had his best game for a while and the 2 flankers were excellent.
The backs were less impressive, though Lawrence justified his selection and added some much needed midfield punch. Slade looked a bit rusty and Farrell was......um...well largely Farrellesque.

Italy were a considerable disappointment.
paddy no 11
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by paddy no 11 »

Farrell is dirt

Willis with a run of games will be exceptional
Banquo
Posts: 19208
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Banquo »

Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:10 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:09 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:07 pm

Hard to argue with any of that. Except Dombrandt who has looked awful.

And not just dump Faz but dump this ludicrous kick to score bollocks!

Pack is still lacklustre. Ball presentation still poor. Attacking moves are largely absent. There’s almost no point playing wing.
Jury out for me- he carried well but consistently inconsistent.
Looks more consistent in the latter to me
Think that’s agreement!

Not averse to Willis, T Curry, Ludlam going forward
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Shiny »

Good:
Willis
Lawrence
Mitchell
Ludlam
Genge

Bad:
Farrell
Dombrandt
The coach who is telling Farrell and Smith to kick through

Everyone else marks time but for the love of god leave Youngs at home again next time please (and Woodward to keep him company).
The green, black and gold army.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by p/d »

Ffs!!! Can we please find a 10 that doesn’t have a natural instinct to kick the ball away. Even when Elvis and his goatee came on we couldn’t escape it!!! Aaaaaggghhh

Good staff from our locks, LudLAM and Jack. Great stuff from Lawrence. Really chuffed for him
User avatar
Shiny
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
Location: Bradford

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Shiny »

Shiny wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:30 pm Good:
Willis
Lawrence
Mitchell
Ludlam
Genge

Bad:
Farrell
Dombrandt
The coach who is telling Farrell and Smith to kick through

Everyone else marks time but for the love of god leave Youngs at home again next time please (and Woodward to keep him company).
Forgot add Chessum into the good category and Vunipola into the thanks but stay at home category.
The green, black and gold army.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3427
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:30 pm
Epaminondas Pules wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:10 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:09 pm

Jury out for me- he carried well but consistently inconsistent.
Looks more consistent in the latter to me
Think that’s agreement!

Not averse to Willis, T Curry, Ludlam going forward
Yep. I’m almost in the category of anyone but Dombrandt.
Beasties
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Beasties »

Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:25 pm chessum is natural born intl...lovely smooth line out ball
I feel like the Hill experiment was just a nightmare that I alone had, and that Eddie never really was the Eng coach either, all in my imagination. I’ve finally woken up and it never actually happened, phew.

Some players just look comfortable.
Last edited by Beasties on Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Danno
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Danno »

Smith was rank bad. Kicked his one touch away to turn it over and promptly fell off three tackles in the ensuing break. Have to suspect that being benched in favour of Him is irksome.
Beasties
Posts: 1312
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Beasties »

Shiny wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:32 pm
Shiny wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:30 pm Good:
Willis
Lawrence
Mitchell
Ludlam
Genge

Bad:
Farrell
Dombrandt
The coach who is telling Farrell and Smith to kick through

Everyone else marks time but for the love of god leave Youngs at home again next time please (and Woodward to keep him company).
Forgot add Chessum into the good category and Vunipola into the thanks but stay at home category.
I’ve never been Mako’s biggest fan but it does seem like his time has clearly passed now. VRR please, with Rodd and West (if getting exposure somewhere soon) pushing.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6397
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Oakboy »

Mako looks to have no international future - following Billy, Youngs and Tuilagi. What about Isiekwe and Dombrandt, though? I hope the latter gets another game but I doubt he will keep T Willis out for long.
stepsider
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2022 5:53 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by stepsider »

Arundell made his mark with hardly any opportunities, shame the ref blew for a England scrum when Henry was about to head for the Italian line. Mitchell lively, too.
Danno
Posts: 2636
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Team for Italy

Post by Danno »

Beasties wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 5:39 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:25 pm chessum is natural born intl...lovely smooth line out ball
I feel like the Hill experiment was just a nightmare that I alone had, and that Eddie never really was the Eng coach either, all in my imagination. I’ve finlly woken up and it never actually happened, phew.

Some players just look comfortable.
Don't forget Ewels!
Post Reply