Brexit.

kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by kk67 »

Sandydragon wrote:
kk67 wrote:
jared_7 wrote:
Blaming immigrants is a result of policy favouring the "elites".
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.
Comparing a lying, manipulative career politician to Trump is being very harsh on the politicos.
I'm not using a vague comparison with Hitler as a cheap political shot, it's not a Godwins Law situation.......the guy is totally out of control and clearly he is without any sort of moral compass.
I don't even believe he's a patriot.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

Sandydragon wrote:
kk67 wrote:
jared_7 wrote:
Blaming immigrants is a result of policy favouring the "elites".
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.
She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
User avatar
Eugene Wrayburn
Posts: 2307
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by Eugene Wrayburn »

kk67 wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
kk67 wrote:
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.
Comparing a lying, manipulative career politician to Trump is being very harsh on the politicos.
I'm not using a vague comparison with Hitler as a cheap political shot, it's not a Godwins Law situation.......the guy is totally out of control and clearly he is without any sort of moral compass.
I don't even believe he's a patriot.
This.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

NS. Gone but not forgotten.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by kk67 »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote: This.
LOL. I was worried before,......now we're agreeing I'm totally petrified.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10444
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by Sandydragon »

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
kk67 wrote:
All too true. It's classic divide and conquer and it's a worldwide phenomenon.

Obviously any sensible person is concerned about Trump but I was particularly struck by the total absence of any content in his speeches. In that respect he really is the new Hitler.
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.
She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.
She walks, talks and acts like one and whilst she wasn't a politician during her last stint in the White House, at least not a paid one, she was every inch a political wife for hers husbands presidency and the years before that. She is as much a political person as any aid politician.

I doubt her integrity, particularly given her run in with the FBI.

That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Brexit.

Post by kk67 »

Sandydragon wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:
Its a shyte line up. Trump vs Clinton. Clinton is a lying manipulative career politician, but Trump is no better. The number of people running law suits against him for various business practices is a cause for concern in itself.
She's a lawyer turned politician. She is not a career politician. She held no political office before she was 53 in 2000.
She walks, talks and acts like one and whilst she wasn't a politician during her last stint in the White House, at least not a paid one, she was every inch a political wife for hers husbands presidency and the years before that. She is as much a political person as any aid politician.

I doubt her integrity, particularly given her run in with the FBI.

That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.
Two words.....Melanie Trump (aka 3rd trophy wife).

If wifes were an issue, we'd have Cherie Blair.
Yet another lawyer,......but at least this time it would be a decent one.
UGagain
Posts: 809
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 7:39 am

Re: Brexit.

Post by UGagain »

Sandydragon wrote:
That said, she is the least worst option, by some considerable margin. Which is a sad state of affairs.
I said some time ago that the slimy neocons would vote for the heinous La Clinton.

And here you are endorsing her.

Yuck.
As for the maths. There are mathematic 'theories' on both sides, they are not the same as mathematical facts. I asked for maths.

Mellsblue.
Post Reply