Team for Fiji

Moderator: Sandydragon

User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:45 pm
Wallpaperman wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 4:02 pm That was painful after a bright start. Wales created chances to win, but no argument with the result. Credit to Fiji, always an exciting side to watch.

Thought that the Welsh maul would be key but it wasn’t enough. Some nice attacking play for a change but the flip side was that they were way smaller and struggled horribly at times in defence. Also some under par performances upfront, Rowlands looked gassed and got isolated a couple of times to concede penalties, and Plumtree missed an important tackle and also gave away some daft penalties.

I still think there is a decent squad to be picked for Wales but this was poor today.

On a separate note, was there much difference between the Reffell yellow and the Radra red ? At least the red was for 20 minutes and not decisive.

A minor gripe, Fiji dropped the ball a few times with play on, I thought that Ben Thomas dropped the ball backwards in the lead up to the disallowed Murray try.
That wasn’t a forward pass and another Fijian scrum should have been ours after a Fijian hand batted the ball forward in the tackle. But the ref was reasonable enough, can’t assign any blame there.

The two red reviews were interesting. I wonder if the fact that Reffell was trying to bind and the Fijian player had been thrown backwards already was the mitigation. For the red, Winnett wasn’t at full height but the Fijian tackler put his shoulder into his head so it was never a legal tackle. That’s the only difference I could reasonably see
Reffell's card reminded me of the shoulder to the face Tompkins got in the Argentina game in the world cup. Which was not even foul play, apparently.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote: Sun Nov 10, 2024 6:53 pm It was always a risk having two backs on the bench particularly as Ben Thomas could have played ten. Losing Grady so early was a bad blow and Costelow looked very out of sorts on the wing (unsurprisingly).

If the intention was always for Bevan to be the wider replacement then that’s a total cockup. We seem to have reverted to the worst of the 90s and are quickly becoming a laughing stock
If Costelow went on, or was sent on by mistake, as Gatland says, that's totally unacceptable. I'm surprised Gatland's admitted* to it, it looks shambolic.

* wrong word, really. He's said that it's happened and someone else is to blame.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10176
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Sandydragon »

On another note. Can anyone give me a sensible reason why we changed half of our pack at the 45 minute mark? If players were blowing or there was a tactical problem to address you’ve just had half time. So why wait another five minutes if the problem is significant.

Otherwise, would another ten minutes not made more sense? And why change four at once.
pompey-zebra
Posts: 534
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by pompey-zebra »

Sandydragon wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 7:28 am On another note. Can anyone give me a sensible reason why we changed half of our pack at the 45 minute mark? If players were blowing or there was a tactical problem to address you’ve just had half time. So why wait another five minutes if the problem is significant.

Otherwise, would another ten minutes not made more sense? And why change four at once.
I read last week that the reason Wales went for a 6-2 split was that a number of the forwards lacked game time and they wanted to cover that potential
Lack of match fitness. That might have been a factor in making the replacements, but why it was made after 45 minutes I don't know. Data, tactics, a hunch, not sure.

The more I read the comments from the Welsh camp, the more I think there's a lack of clarity within the camp. Gatland says there was a " lot of debate" over the 6-2 split. Maybe they're trying to cover everything by trying to be clever and not seeing the wood for the trees.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10176
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Sandydragon »

The Fijians had come out strongly and momentum was very much in their favour at the time, but the change still felt more of a preplanned move than a reaction to events on the pitch.
normanski
Posts: 1256
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by normanski »

It seems we have the right ingredients for a decent team as demonstrated by the first 20 minutes but silly errors like Reffell’s yellow lost us that early momentum. Can’t see us making much impression against Australia who look like a team on the rise.
pompey-zebra
Posts: 534
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by pompey-zebra »

normanski wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 11:08 am It seems we have the right ingredients for a decent team as demonstrated by the first 20 minutes but silly errors like Reffell’s yellow lost us that early momentum. Can’t see us making much impression against Australia who look like a team on the rise.
I was quite impressed early on after Winnett's try was chalked off, Wales came back to be awarded the penalty try shortly after. That showed they didn't let the try being ruled out throw them off. But as you say, the silly errors started creeping in- the truck and trailer penalty from a good driving maul for example. Once the pressure started building it just got worse- turnovers, soft penalties, handling errors. Some of them were in good attacking positions too which was perhaps most frustrating.
User avatar
Graigwen
Posts: 546
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Graigwen »

I thought that we really threw that game away.

Fiji were just good, but we could not reach even that standard. Between wayward passes, dropped passes and missed tackles we did not deserve to win. I know we got the wrong end of some questionable refereeing, but our problems are much worse than that. The team looked as if they were short of practice. As for the cock up about Grady's replacement...???!!!

That was a bad game to lose. There were good flashes, buts lots of inattention. We played like a team short of brainpower. I remember the good old days when Faletau used to catch kick offs and set up attacks, now kicks offs to us are just an opportunity for the opposition to attack.

Two more losses to come I guess.
.
User avatar
Buggaluggs
Posts: 1266
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Buggaluggs »

So we didn't score a point between minute 15 and minute 66?
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 7:28 am On another note. Can anyone give me a sensible reason why we changed half of our pack at the 45 minute mark? If players were blowing or there was a tactical problem to address you’ve just had half time. So why wait another five minutes if the problem is significant.

Otherwise, would another ten minutes not made more sense? And why change four at once.
It does seem mad. They've just had a 10 minute break. I guess they were told to empty the tank but I would have thought 10 or 15 minutes would have been better.

And you'd have thought that he'd have kept captain and human tank, Dewi Lake, on for a bit longer. Since his lineout work was good, what was the hurry?
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Frustrating to read some of the overblown journalism on the match. It was a very close game and we had the opportunity to win it - there were two kickable penalties we didn't take despite being just behind on the scoreboard - one we went to the corner, one Williams took quickly. Neither gave us any points.

The 6-2 split and Costelow selection and shambolic substitution error(?) were unforgivable though.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

normanski wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2024 11:08 am It seems we have the right ingredients for a decent team as demonstrated by the first 20 minutes but silly errors like Reffell’s yellow lost us that early momentum. Can’t see us making much impression against Australia who look like a team on the rise.
They've got a good coach.
pompey-zebra
Posts: 534
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by pompey-zebra »

The Fail's reporting that Grady has been ruled out for 2 months with injury. The report also says that Josh Adams and Liam Williams are training with the squad but the coaching staff feels there's currently enough cover. Presumably that's not Costelow.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

pompey-zebra wrote: Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:40 am The Fail's reporting that Grady has been ruled out for 2 months with injury. The report also says that Josh Adams and Liam Williams are training with the squad but the coaching staff feels there's currently enough cover. Presumably that's not Costelow.
FFS. Assume Dyer will come in now although Rogers would be fine in my book.

I would assume this makes another 6-2 split even less likely. I'm not against 6-2 necessarily but you need to have players who can cover a lot of positions.
pompey-zebra
Posts: 534
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by pompey-zebra »

From the Fail again:
Steffan Thomas Wales XV: Cameron Winnett; Tom Rogers, Max Llewellyn, Eddie James, Blair Murray; Ben Thomas, Tomos Williams; Gareth Thomas, Dewi Lake (Captain), Henry Thomas, Will Rowlands, Adam Beard, Taine Plumtree, Jac Morgan, Aaron Wainwright. Replacements: Ryan Elias, Nicky Smith, Archie Griffin, Christ Tshiunza, James Botham, Ellis Bevan, Gareth Anscombe, Rio Dyer

An opinion piece, I think, rather than a leaked team before the official announcement ( as just before the Fiji game). I'd imagine Dyer would start, but as SoM suggests Rogers would be ok too. I still think Anscombe will start maybe with B Thomas on the bench. ( lots of Thomases/Tomos/Tom's in that squad. Nepotism from Steffan Thomas?)
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 4592
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

pompey-zebra wrote: Tue Nov 12, 2024 12:29 pm From the Fail again:
Steffan Thomas Wales XV: Cameron Winnett; Tom Rogers, Max Llewellyn, Eddie James, Blair Murray; Ben Thomas, Tomos Williams; Gareth Thomas, Dewi Lake (Captain), Henry Thomas, Will Rowlands, Adam Beard, Taine Plumtree, Jac Morgan, Aaron Wainwright. Replacements: Ryan Elias, Nicky Smith, Archie Griffin, Christ Tshiunza, James Botham, Ellis Bevan, Gareth Anscombe, Rio Dyer

An opinion piece, I think, rather than a leaked team before the official announcement ( as just before the Fiji game). I'd imagine Dyer would start, but as SoM suggests Rogers would be ok too. I still think Anscombe will start maybe with B Thomas on the bench. ( lots of Thomases/Tomos/Tom's in that squad. Nepotism from Steffan Thomas?)
I'd be reasonably happy with that team although I don't think Gatland will change it up so much. I don't really mind if we keep 10 & 12 from last week, but if so I'd like to see James instead of Llewellyn.
Wallpaperman
Posts: 737
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 5:21 pm
Location: Colchester

Re: Team for Fiji

Post by Wallpaperman »

pompey-zebra wrote: Tue Nov 12, 2024 12:29 pm From the Fail again:
Steffan Thomas Wales XV: Cameron Winnett; Tom Rogers, Max Llewellyn, Eddie James, Blair Murray; Ben Thomas, Tomos Williams; Gareth Thomas, Dewi Lake (Captain), Henry Thomas, Will Rowlands, Adam Beard, Taine Plumtree, Jac Morgan, Aaron Wainwright. Replacements: Ryan Elias, Nicky Smith, Archie Griffin, Christ Tshiunza, James Botham, Ellis Bevan, Gareth Anscombe, Rio Dyer

An opinion piece, I think, rather than a leaked team before the official announcement ( as just before the Fiji game). I'd imagine Dyer would start, but as SoM suggests Rogers would be ok too. I still think Anscombe will start maybe with B Thomas on the bench. ( lots of Thomases/Tomos/Tom's in that squad. Nepotism from Steffan Thomas?)
Not a bad side. Rogers over Dyer is an odd one, Dyer seemed to be pretty certain of his place not so long ago. Rogers has had a good season, he maybe deserves another chance. Murray played well on the other wing. There were a couple of uncapped wingers who really came on at the back of last season in Cabango at Cardiff, and Lewis at the Scarlets, both looked excellent and if i remember rightly both picked up serious injuries in their respective last games of the season. Factor in Adams, Reagan Grace and the one currently struggling in American football and the wing options could be pretty good.

Totally agree with Henry Thomas starting and Griffin on the bench. If managed well Griffin might become the sort of ball carrying prop we all hoped Leon Brown would be, fair play to his effort last week but it was a strange call to start him when he hadn’t played for a few weeks.

Thinking back on last week, the back row didn’t go well, and they didn’t look a unit. Hopefully Jac Morgan can pull them together this week, he must start.

I thought we would see Freddie Thomas last week, he might make the bench this week instead of Botham or Tshiunza.
Post Reply