Behaviour and bans

zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by zer0 »

Lizard wrote:(PS: perhaps check out the RygbiRoom first)
Huh. It's still going?
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Lizard »

zer0 wrote:
Lizard wrote:(PS: perhaps check out the RygbiRoom first)
Huh. It's still going?
Well, the site is still active but seems to have only one user who has made the most recent post in every single thread.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Donny osmond
Posts: 3258
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: RE: Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Donny osmond »

Lizard wrote:Don't the rules allow an appeal of a mod's decision to an admin?

If it's that bad without UG, how about you all thank Hammy nicely for his work over more than a decade, and go and set up your own board and issue a gilt invitation to UG to sign up? It's a free world.

(PS: perhaps check out the RygbiRoom first)
This is actually a very good plan.
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3851
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Lizard »

Donny osmond wrote:
Lizard wrote:Don't the rules allow an appeal of a mod's decision to an admin?

If it's that bad without UG, how about you all thank Hammy nicely for his work over more than a decade, and go and set up your own board and issue a gilt invitation to UG to sign up? It's a free world.

(PS: perhaps check out the RygbiRoom first)
This is actually a very good plan.
Off you go then, son. Post us a link when it's up and running. Reserve username "Lizard" for me.

Just remember, the right to free speech does not imply an obligation to provide a platform.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Donny osmond
Posts: 3258
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm

Re: RE: Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Donny osmond »

Lizard wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:
Lizard wrote:Don't the rules allow an appeal of a mod's decision to an admin?

If it's that bad without UG, how about you all thank Hammy nicely for his work over more than a decade, and go and set up your own board and issue a gilt invitation to UG to sign up? It's a free world.

(PS: perhaps check out the RygbiRoom first)
This is actually a very good plan.
Off you go then, son. Post us a link when it's up and running. Reserve username "Lizard" for me.

Just remember, the right to free speech does not imply an obligation to provide a platform.
Nah you're alright thanks, I'm not one of those who think this place is all that bad without UG. You didn't get that from my posts?

I think the whole concept of "free speech" is much misunderstood.
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
User avatar
Zhivago
Posts: 1949
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:36 am
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Zhivago »

Due to recent mod actions, I will not be posting here any more. Thanks for all the good times.

Все буде Україна!
Смерть ворогам!!

J Dory
Posts: 994
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by J Dory »

I'm on a hunger strike.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Len »

Flounce!

I'm surprised Kamber took UGs banning so seriously considering all UG used to do was buttfuck him up and down the inferno for a giggle but hey ho.
User avatar
Tre
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Tre »

This thread is epic.

Have a word with yourselves you bunch of weirdos
User avatar
Vengeful Glutton
Posts: 451
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
Location: Circle No.3

Re: Behaviour and bans

Post by Vengeful Glutton »

cashead wrote:
Coco wrote:
Eugene Wrayburn wrote:There is nothing wrong with being passionate and sticking to one's views. We try to understand that passionate argument sometimes spills over into abuse, which whilst not acceptable is forgiveable.

What is not forgiveable is repatedly threatening another poster. Leaving aside for the moment that it's a criminal offence, it's clearly contrary to the letter and the spirit of the rules of the forum. People come here to enjoy themselves and we will protect them from threats. A poster who can't be trusted not to threaten someone else can't be on the forum. As for "well it's on the internet so it doesn't matter" well that's obvious nonsense, quite apart from the fact that UG suggested threats irl.

Accordingly I've banned UG permanently. I couldn't give a monkey's what his politics were and you can all feel free to be trotskite or anarchist socialists or crypto-fascist for all I care. Just don't threaten other people and expect to stay on the forum.
Permanently? :?

I guess I missed what happened to cause somebody to feel unsafe, or threatened by typewritten words. Unless, of course, it was written in caps... That surely means yelling right?

Mods judgement call, and I guess if there was a threat of terrorism or death.. Its justified. Take your word that it was serious, although it takes some of the zest out of the posting personalities here. Thats what gave it life imo.

:(
Here's the long and short of it - I rustled his jimmies, so he decided to try to attack me based on what I do for a living, so I decided to mash on one of his many rage triggers (which, admittedly earned me a 2-day break, but fuck me, dude's basically a walking trigger), so he said something like "Watch it, or I'll find you." Something asinine like that. He did a ninja edit, but I'd seen it, quoted it and called him out on it because fuck him, if he's going to act like that. After initially trying to half-heartedly backpedal, he doubled down, and repeated the "I wish I was Clint Eastwood from Dirty Harry, but someone's written Clint in all caps so it looks like CUNT Eastwood instead" level threats. Then ban, then upgraded to permaban.
Crash test dummy?
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
Post Reply