Cricket fred

Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

2nd test could be going better :) :)
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4336
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Banquo wrote: Thu Jul 03, 2025 5:33 pm 2nd test could be going better :) :)
Nearly in Deep do-do.. :o
Can't see the acclaimed Eng run-chase credentials being put to the test in this match unfortunately.
The 2 at the crease have a big hill to climb for sure !
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

could have done without that start
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

not a bad partnership....this Smith lad can bat a bit....
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

lower order and now bowlers chucking away a 300 run stand. annoying
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

really poor bowling, definitely a weak link post Jimmy and Stu. Almost giving away the test here.
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

change of bowling ....huzza
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4336
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

Needed that - still a massive lead at this stage.
( If 6 of your team bag a 🦆, lasting 15 balls between them, it's putting a bit of pressure on the rest :) ..)
Banquo
Posts: 19507
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote: Fri Jul 04, 2025 6:16 pm Needed that - still a massive lead at this stage.
( If 6 of your team bag a 🦆, lasting 15 balls between them, it's putting a bit of pressure on the rest :) ..)
yus
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17913
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Can anyone inform me of the point of Chris Woakes and why we kept him, but had to shuffle on Anderson?

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply