Cricket fred

Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Dropping jaiswal a million time will likely cost us the series win. Really shambolic
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Zak ices the cake of wtafness- great ball tbf
fivepointer
Posts: 4737
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Too much sloppy cricket over last 2 days. Some poor batting and bowling, not helped by dreadful catching and uninspired captaincy. Boy are we missing Stokes.

Worth noting that Tongue, despite his lack of consistency. has taken more wickets (19) than any other England bowler and has done it in 3 tests. The guy has got something.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote: Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:11 am Too much sloppy cricket over last 2 days. Some poor batting and bowling, not helped by dreadful catching and uninspired captaincy. Boy are we missing Stokes.

Worth noting that Tongue, despite his lack of consistency. has taken more wickets (19) than any other England bowler and has done it in 3 tests. The guy has got something.
He does, but those extras were poor and we wasted the opportunity to shoot them out for about 150 day one. Suspect he needs to get overs under his belt.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4138
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

A very tough ask becomes even tougher with the top 3 back in the shed.
Eng. will rue all loose/sloppy stuff and spills, characteristics of a makeshift team tbf..
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

have to hand it to this team, always looking play and win. Brook was brilliant, but daft at the end. Root....sublime so far.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4138
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

57 to win, 6 wickets left 17 overs to new ball..but drizzle delay.
JR still there - fantastic effort.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Galfon wrote: Sun Aug 03, 2025 4:21 pm 57 to win, 6 wickets left 17 overs to new ball..but drizzle delay.
JR still there - fantastic effort.
Ooops potly

Great bowling India post brook
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Shame for the crowd- great day… nearly
fivepointer
Posts: 4737
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Brilliant from Brook and Root to get us into a winning position. Have we frittered it away? Smith and Overton hardly inspired confidence.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4138
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Galfon »

It's a pity, JR was going steadier towards his ton after HB loss, and Bethell had 2 scoring shots in 31 balls, not up to speed yet.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 15978
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Once again, our batting digging us put of a hole that our bowling and fielding have dug. Still a touch more parlous than I'd like, given that we're effectively 7 down with Woakes's injury, but you'd like to hope that we can get 35 runs, especially with Smith at the crease.

Really hope we do, cause the Indian team have been increasingly shitty over the course of the series. Did not enjoy Deep putting a sarcastic arm around Duckett's shoulder and walking him off, nor whatever sledging was strong enough to get an angry reaction out of Root of all people. I did especially enjoy the expression on Krishna's face after he'd gloating in Brook's face about him getting caught, only to realise that Siraj had stepped on the rope and it was in fact 6 instead of out.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:26 pm Once again, our batting digging us put of a hole that our bowling and fielding have dug. Still a touch more parlous than I'd like, given that we're effectively 7 down with Woakes's injury, but you'd like to hope that we can get 35 runs, especially with Smith at the crease.

Really hope we do, cause the Indian team have been increasingly shitty over the course of the series. Did not enjoy Deep putting a sarcastic arm around Duckett's shoulder and walking him off, nor whatever sledging was strong enough to get an angry reaction out of Root of all people. I did especially enjoy the expression on Krishna's face after he'd gloating in Brook's face about him getting caught, only to realise that Siraj had stepped on the rope and it was in fact 6 instead of out.

Puja
Fancy us to do it more tomorrow am than this evening. Must have been mega muggy which explains the ball hooping around.
But for extras in the first innings 😂😂
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 15978
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Disappointing from Smith. Needed to shepherd the tail and instead gets out cheaply. In fairness, the ball is hooping around, but he's got to do better than that. Just waving his bat around outside off stump.

Overton out with a whisker of an umpire's call LBW and we're now one away from Woakes batting left-handed with one hand. Surely that'll just be a case of bowling at the stumps and it's game over. All rests on Tongue staying off strike and letting Atkinson bat, you'd've thought - Tongue does owe us a few runs from the first innings's bowling, so it's time to pay up by staying in.

19 runs isn't much to get though. If we'd held onto any one of our 6 dropped catches, we'd be over and done with now.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Doh. Could focus on mad extras tally, 1st innings fall away, Woakes injury, daft last wicket stand from India, dropped catches, Harry Brook mad shot. BUT credit India with brilliant bowling as soon as Brook went, and again this morning. Great game.


PS....Bethell's selection was dubious, lets face it.
Last edited by Banquo on Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 15978
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

Crying shame. Falling 7 runs short of the win, 6 short of the tie. Incredible effort from Atkinson, managing 10 runs and nearly 3 overs effectively batting on his own, with Woakes clearly only capable of being at the non-striker's end and finding running incredibly painful.

Just rewatched the Overton dismissal and we're incredibly unlucky - it doesn't look out in the slightest, the umpire took so long about raising the finger that we'd run a leg-bye before he gave it, and the DRS shows it's umpire's call by the width of a coat of paint. India wouldn't even have considered reviewing that one had it not been given.

Never mind - we had no sort of luck this test in general with Woakes's injury, but no doubt we've ridden our luck elsewhere, and the loss was much more down to our shambolic catching and Tongue's 1st innings extras. If both can be cleaned up, then there's hope for the Ashes.

Puja
Backist Monk
fivepointer
Posts: 4737
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Puja wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:05 pm Crying shame. Falling 7 runs short of the win, 6 short of the tie. Incredible effort from Atkinson, managing 10 runs and nearly 3 overs effectively batting on his own, with Woakes clearly only capable of being at the non-striker's end and finding running incredibly painful.

Just rewatched the Overton dismissal and we're incredibly unlucky - it doesn't look out in the slightest, the umpire took so long about raising the finger that we'd run a leg-bye before he gave it, and the DRS shows it's umpire's call by the width of a coat of paint. India wouldn't even have considered reviewing that one had it not been given.

Never mind - we had no sort of luck this test in general with Woakes's injury, but no doubt we've ridden our luck elsewhere, and the loss was much more down to our shambolic catching and Tongue's 1st innings extras. If both can be cleaned up, then there's hope for the Ashes.

Puja
My ire is directed towards the batting of our numbers 6,7 and 8 who mustered a pathetic 27 runs between them.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 15978
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Puja »

fivepointer wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:27 pm
Puja wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:05 pm Crying shame. Falling 7 runs short of the win, 6 short of the tie. Incredible effort from Atkinson, managing 10 runs and nearly 3 overs effectively batting on his own, with Woakes clearly only capable of being at the non-striker's end and finding running incredibly painful.

Just rewatched the Overton dismissal and we're incredibly unlucky - it doesn't look out in the slightest, the umpire took so long about raising the finger that we'd run a leg-bye before he gave it, and the DRS shows it's umpire's call by the width of a coat of paint. India wouldn't even have considered reviewing that one had it not been given.

Never mind - we had no sort of luck this test in general with Woakes's injury, but no doubt we've ridden our luck elsewhere, and the loss was much more down to our shambolic catching and Tongue's 1st innings extras. If both can be cleaned up, then there's hope for the Ashes.

Puja
My ire is directed towards the batting of our numbers 6,7 and 8 who mustered a pathetic 27 runs between them.
Hmm. Overton I'll forgive because he's not a batsman and got two absolutely belting deliveries for both his wickets. Bethell was clearly a selection error - he's such a talent, but it's a huge risk to drop an inexperienced youngster back into the starting XI off the back of lengthy injuries and just one red ball game in 2025. Smith was hugely disappointing, but he's got more than enough credit in the bank and anyone can have a crappy test as a batsman.

Dropping Jaiswal three times in his hundred, including Dawson's one on 49 where the ball went to him, flat, at head height, and he managed to let it through his hands and hit him in the face, was the key issue for me. Our second innings batting was heroic, but India should never have got anywhere near 396 on that pitch and that's what lost us the game.

Puja
Backist Monk
pompey-zebra
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by pompey-zebra »

I thought England were going to scrape over the line after Atkinson's shot was parried for six, and Jurel missed the stumps to run out Woakes. But Siraj was a man on a mission, and served his 5- for.

Both sides could look at each test and think of things that cost them and it could easily have been 3-1 to either side. But things really did even out over 24 and a bit days, and a drawn series was probably fair.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:58 pm
fivepointer wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:27 pm
Puja wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:05 pm Crying shame. Falling 7 runs short of the win, 6 short of the tie. Incredible effort from Atkinson, managing 10 runs and nearly 3 overs effectively batting on his own, with Woakes clearly only capable of being at the non-striker's end and finding running incredibly painful.

Just rewatched the Overton dismissal and we're incredibly unlucky - it doesn't look out in the slightest, the umpire took so long about raising the finger that we'd run a leg-bye before he gave it, and the DRS shows it's umpire's call by the width of a coat of paint. India wouldn't even have considered reviewing that one had it not been given.

Never mind - we had no sort of luck this test in general with Woakes's injury, but no doubt we've ridden our luck elsewhere, and the loss was much more down to our shambolic catching and Tongue's 1st innings extras. If both can be cleaned up, then there's hope for the Ashes.

Puja
My ire is directed towards the batting of our numbers 6,7 and 8 who mustered a pathetic 27 runs between them.
Hmm. Overton I'll forgive because he's not a batsman and got two absolutely belting deliveries for both his wickets. Bethell was clearly a selection error - he's such a talent, but it's a huge risk to drop an inexperienced youngster back into the starting XI off the back of lengthy injuries and just one red ball game in 2025. Smith was hugely disappointing, but he's got more than enough credit in the bank and anyone can have a crappy test as a batsman.

Dropping Jaiswal three times in his hundred, including Dawson's one on 49 where the ball went to him, flat, at head height, and he managed to let it through his hands and hit him in the face, was the key issue for me. Our second innings batting was heroic, but India should never have got anywhere near 396 on that pitch and that's what lost us the game.

Puja
Bottom line is that the game was all but won an hour from the close yesterday- we’d overcome blunders and playing with a man down for most of the game. Brook plays a poor shot and thereafter India bowled brilliantly.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

pompey-zebra wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:18 pm I thought England were going to scrape over the line after Atkinson's shot was parried for six, and Jurel missed the stumps to run out Woakes. But Siraj was a man on a mission, and served his 5- for.

Both sides could look at each test and think of things that cost them and it could easily have been 3-1 to either side. But things really did even out over 24 and a bit days, and a drawn series was probably fair.
Kind of, but in each of the last two matches we had India on the floor but failed to kill them off, to their huge credit I guess.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:27 pm
Puja wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 12:05 pm Crying shame. Falling 7 runs short of the win, 6 short of the tie. Incredible effort from Atkinson, managing 10 runs and nearly 3 overs effectively batting on his own, with Woakes clearly only capable of being at the non-striker's end and finding running incredibly painful.

Just rewatched the Overton dismissal and we're incredibly unlucky - it doesn't look out in the slightest, the umpire took so long about raising the finger that we'd run a leg-bye before he gave it, and the DRS shows it's umpire's call by the width of a coat of paint. India wouldn't even have considered reviewing that one had it not been given.

Never mind - we had no sort of luck this test in general with Woakes's injury, but no doubt we've ridden our luck elsewhere, and the loss was much more down to our shambolic catching and Tongue's 1st innings extras. If both can be cleaned up, then there's hope for the Ashes.

Puja
My ire is directed towards the batting of our numbers 6,7 and 8 who mustered a pathetic 27 runs between them.
Bethell was a rogue pick but Smith just had a bad couple of knocks- this morning he’d have been better off coming out swinging tbh… rather than the ball 😂
pompey-zebra
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by pompey-zebra »

Banquo wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:30 pm
pompey-zebra wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:18 pm I thought England were going to scrape over the line after Atkinson's shot was parried for six, and Jurel missed the stumps to run out Woakes. But Siraj was a man on a mission, and served his 5- for.

Both sides could look at each test and think of things that cost them and it could easily have been 3-1 to either side. But things really did even out over 24 and a bit days, and a drawn series was probably fair.
Kind of, but in each of the last two matches we had India on the floor but failed to kill them off, to their huge credit I guess.
That's true, but in the first test, India were on course to set England 450-500 to win but only managed a target of 370 odd which England chased down. Given they had 5 centurions during the match, but bugger all from the rest they probably feel they chucked that win away.

I think both sides can look at periods in the series and say "f only..." but overall they balenced each other out.
Banquo
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by Banquo »

pompey-zebra wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 3:26 pm
Banquo wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:30 pm
pompey-zebra wrote: Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:18 pm I thought England were going to scrape over the line after Atkinson's shot was parried for six, and Jurel missed the stumps to run out Woakes. But Siraj was a man on a mission, and served his 5- for.

Both sides could look at each test and think of things that cost them and it could easily have been 3-1 to either side. But things really did even out over 24 and a bit days, and a drawn series was probably fair.
Kind of, but in each of the last two matches we had India on the floor but failed to kill them off, to their huge credit I guess.
That's true, but in the first test, India were on course to set England 450-500 to win but only managed a target of 370 odd which England chased down. Given they had 5 centurions during the match, but bugger all from the rest they probably feel they chucked that win away.

I think both sides can look at periods in the series and say "f only..." but overall they balenced each other out.
I actually think India had the better of more sessions and days than we did, but we did get ourselves in end game positions where winning was easier than drawing or losing!
fivepointer
Posts: 4737
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Cricket fred

Post by fivepointer »

Isnt it time cricket allowed proper injury substitutions?

Pant shouldnt have had to bat in one test and the sight of Woakes with his arm in a sling was utterly ridiculous. Is there any other sport where this kind of carry on would be allowed?

Seems to me if a player sustains a match ending injury they should be able to be replaced by a similar player.
Post Reply