I didn't realise that as I'd only seen white people in the articles.Coco wrote:You realize there are ranchers of every color supporting this? It really isnt a matter of color. This has to do with the feds taking over massive land when this land should be for local or state use. The only person shot dead was a white protester i believe.WaspInWales wrote:Good time to revisit the above comment:WaspInWales wrote:
That said, I wonder if this would've ended differently if Black Lives Matter were armed and occupying a federal building for weeks?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-37795012
Acquitted for a 41 day armed takeover of a federal building.
Justice - US style, although I would not recommend any person, or persons of darker skin tone to try a similar line of protest against things that they feel a sense of injustice over.
My point about colour was more the fact that some innocent black men have to do very little in order to get shot and killed by the police, whereas these douchbags take control of a federal building for a significant amount of time, whilst armed but manage to not only get away with the loss of one life in a skirmish but then manage to escape conviction for their action.
I wonder if a Black Lives Matter group that took up arms in a similar building would be afforded the same outcome?
That was my point.