
Seems like there was no Trump surge, more of a Clinton slump. Maybe we can stop with the "voice of the oppressed" stuff and how the unheard have found their voices? Democrats fwced up and swing voters turned away from them. Simples.
In this country we have the media making up people's minds for them,.....watching the vox-pops it does seem that a lot of Trump supporters are desperate to name check God in the political process. I was just wondering about the Tele-vangelists/self-appointed religious leaders role in the US political sphere...?.Donny osmond wrote:
Seems like there was no Trump surge, more of a Clinton slump. Maybe we can stop with the "voice of the oppressed" stuff and how the unheard have found their voices? Democrats fwced up and swing voters turned away from them. Simples.
And then there's this one, on the percentage of the population of the USA who voted for the eventual winner:Donny osmond wrote:
You thinking of all those private armies in the sticks? Its a fair point.Lizard wrote:On the bright side, and in the short term, I'd rather that Trump won and Clinton supporters protested as a mob than vice versa.
I saw this earlier.Donny osmond wrote:
Seems like there was no Trump surge, more of a Clinton slump. Maybe we can stop with the "voice of the oppressed" stuff and how the unheard have found their voices? Democrats fwced up and swing voters turned away from them. Simples.
Bush 2004 would have been the 9/11 effect.Sandydragon wrote:Interstingly, Bush polled 62 million voters in 2004 and 50 million in 2000. Its quite surprising how much the democrat votes changes; was this purely down to the Obama effect?
rowan wrote:Trumpism seems a custom-made antithesis to Obama politics, which never really happened anyway. America elected Obama because he was the antithesis to his infamous predecessor, and now they've swung back and elected Trump for precisely the same reason. So the good news is, next time they'll pick someone sensible![]()
Meanwhile, I need to pick up a lottery ticket. After the Canes Super Rugby Triumph, Fiji's gold in Rio, and Clinton not winning, this seems to be my year.![]()
Mmmm....I think Hils is probably enough of a student of politics to understand what Kennedy did about Bay of Pigs.rowan wrote:Strange that I'm relieved we're not all going to perish in WWIII over Syria? Oookay...
In that case, you are not aware of her record as Secretary of State nor her intentions as a presidential candidate. I suggest you do some research. Just google it, because it's all there in black and white.kk67 wrote:Mmmm....I think Hils is probably enough of a student of politics to understand what Kennedy did about Bay of Pigs.rowan wrote:Strange that I'm relieved we're not all going to perish in WWIII over Syria? Oookay...
I think you overstate her war-mongering.
You're right. It's disgusting.rowan wrote:In that case, you are not aware of her record as Secretary of State nor her intentions as a presidential candidate. I suggest you do some research. Just google it, because it's all there in black and white.kk67 wrote:Mmmm....I think Hils is probably enough of a student of politics to understand what Kennedy did about Bay of Pigs.rowan wrote:Strange that I'm relieved we're not all going to perish in WWIII over Syria? Oookay...
I think you overstate her war-mongering.
My personal view is that there is a tendancy among both American and British commentators to grossly understate the war crimes of their politicians. They treat the deaths of hundreds of thousands as though this were some trivial detail, a pesky inconvenience that only some fixated lunatic would be deeply concerned about. Easy from a distance, & that's precisely why America and Britain have gone on committing horrendous war crime after horrendous war crime against innocent women, children and men in their multitudes.
You utter bell peicekk67 wrote:I did hear a Scottish guy on the radio today talking about how Donald always did everything to the very best standard. He knows him quite well. He was particularly strident on this point that Donald always did things to the very highest standard. Very strident, in a fairly posh highlands accent. At the time I just thought 'twat'....but given my current half-cut sense of optimism,....maybe those people who have so avidly watched the 'you're hired' stuff in the UK and US (I've never watched an entire episode of either) might have a point.
......If Trump actually went for a sum of the talents, apolitical, business based cabinet and ruled it like a reality tv show,.....it might just work.
<pictureofthechoreographerintheproducerssaying'anditwillwork'>
turn,turn,kick,turn.
Yeah, was a very good doc, quite surreal even by Curtis' standards. Have you seen Bitter Lake?canta_brian wrote:Anyone see Hypernormalisation?
One of the main themes in this was the idea that the banks were now running the show and that politics no longer mattered. It seems they may have won the day in this election in that the "common man" seems to have rejected a career politician in favour of a businessman. Seems the banks not only have managed to ensure the market runs the world, but also managed to convince the people it is anyone but them that is the problem.
Not seen that one. I will check it out,jared_7 wrote:Yeah, was a very good doc, quite surreal even by Curtis' standards. Have you seen Bitter Lake?canta_brian wrote:Anyone see Hypernormalisation?
One of the main themes in this was the idea that the banks were now running the show and that politics no longer mattered. It seems they may have won the day in this election in that the "common man" seems to have rejected a career politician in favour of a businessman. Seems the banks not only have managed to ensure the market runs the world, but also managed to convince the people it is anyone but them that is the problem.