6 Nations
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 12150
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Finally got to watch it. It's pretty much all been said but defence early on was fantastic, particularly the props and flankers, but everyone really. Jones did look a touch rusty, not sure whether that's worth a swap out for Bennet either. Russell obviously a threat but still too fucking wild at moments and that was already knowing we won the game.
Only really watched the latter stages of the second half, couldn't handle watching that bit.
Laidlaw playing like a 9 was the most exciting thing about the first half to me. Whatever I may say about his speed of service sometimes I can't explain how much I enjoyed his stupid face at the end.
Only really watched the latter stages of the second half, couldn't handle watching that bit.
Laidlaw playing like a 9 was the most exciting thing about the first half to me. Whatever I may say about his speed of service sometimes I can't explain how much I enjoyed his stupid face at the end.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Right, France up Next.
They won't be as good at the Breakdown as Ireland but they do have powerful Players. Their Pack is massive. They are trying to develop an offloading game (see their try vs England) although it is still not very fluent. Their Back line is not very impressive ( Not as it used to be).
They have brought Lacroix into the training camp (who is having an amazing season with LaRochelle). He is a speedy winger, fairly small in size. I believe they might thing of Bringing Bastareaud in against us to attack our potential size deficiency. Goujon (or is it Gourdon?), their 7, played a vital part in their link game and should be watched. I think our back row should be able to handle him unless they are carried away by Picamoles, Goujon, Vahamina, Maestry, Baille, Antonio, Guirado...
They won't be as good at the Breakdown as Ireland but they do have powerful Players. Their Pack is massive. They are trying to develop an offloading game (see their try vs England) although it is still not very fluent. Their Back line is not very impressive ( Not as it used to be).
They have brought Lacroix into the training camp (who is having an amazing season with LaRochelle). He is a speedy winger, fairly small in size. I believe they might thing of Bringing Bastareaud in against us to attack our potential size deficiency. Goujon (or is it Gourdon?), their 7, played a vital part in their link game and should be watched. I think our back row should be able to handle him unless they are carried away by Picamoles, Goujon, Vahamina, Maestry, Baille, Antonio, Guirado...
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: 6 Nations
I'd go for:
Forwards:
Reid
Ford
ZJRF
Gray squared
Now, this is where it gets a bit interesting. Wilson and Watson are in, not been a fan of Wilson but continues to deserve his shirt. But what to do about the other spot? We need some physicality for this game so we could do with Strauss carrying a bit better than last week.
Same backline as last week. Still would consider Scott on the bench.
Subs: Same players as last week with Brown and Dell. Possibly Welsh for Berghan.
Forwards:
Reid
Ford
ZJRF
Gray squared
Now, this is where it gets a bit interesting. Wilson and Watson are in, not been a fan of Wilson but continues to deserve his shirt. But what to do about the other spot? We need some physicality for this game so we could do with Strauss carrying a bit better than last week.
Same backline as last week. Still would consider Scott on the bench.
Subs: Same players as last week with Brown and Dell. Possibly Welsh for Berghan.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: 6 Nations
ESPN GB+I team of the week:
Hogg
North
Henshaw
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss
Hogg
North
Henshaw
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Big D wrote:I'd go for:
Forwards:
Reid
Ford
ZJRF
Gray squared
Now, this is where it gets a bit interesting. Wilson and Watson are in, not been a fan of Wilson but continues to deserve his shirt. But what to do about the other spot? We need some physicality for this game so we could do with Strauss carrying a bit better than last week.
Same backline as last week. Still would consider Scott on the bench.
Subs: Same players as last week with Brown and Dell. Possibly Welsh for Berghan.
I was thinking of Scott at 13 and Jones as the impact player. I think Jones can cover more and can bring a lot as the French get tired.
wouldn't mind CDP on the bench.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: 6 Nations
That's not a bad shout re Scott and Jones. I do think Jones is the better player though.Adder wrote:Big D wrote:I'd go for:
Forwards:
Reid
Ford
ZJRF
Gray squared
Now, this is where it gets a bit interesting. Wilson and Watson are in, not been a fan of Wilson but continues to deserve his shirt. But what to do about the other spot? We need some physicality for this game so we could do with Strauss carrying a bit better than last week.
Same backline as last week. Still would consider Scott on the bench.
Subs: Same players as last week with Brown and Dell. Possibly Welsh for Berghan.
I was thinking of Scott at 13 and Jones as the impact player. I think Jones can cover more and can bring a lot as the French get tired.
wouldn't mind CDP on the bench.
CdP is an option, but Barclay had a great defensive game off the bench. I do wonder whether CdP is a start or miss out totally option.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: 6 Nations
Big D wrote:That's not a bad shout re Scott and Jones. I do think Jones is the better player though.Adder wrote:Big D wrote:I'd go for:
Forwards:
Reid
Ford
ZJRF
Gray squared
Now, this is where it gets a bit interesting. Wilson and Watson are in, not been a fan of Wilson but continues to deserve his shirt. But what to do about the other spot? We need some physicality for this game so we could do with Strauss carrying a bit better than last week.
Same backline as last week. Still would consider Scott on the bench.
Subs: Same players as last week with Brown and Dell. Possibly Welsh for Berghan.
I was thinking of Scott at 13 and Jones as the impact player. I think Jones can cover more and can bring a lot as the French get tired.
wouldn't mind CDP on the bench.
CdP is an option, but Barclay had a great defensive game off the bench. I do wonder whether CdP is a start or miss out totally option.
Jones does seem the better player but I wouldn't want him to get injured because of the French physicality( not that he has given any signs of not being able to cope with it). I think Scott has shown signs during the whole season that he is Hungry, he has improved in defence and he runs great lines and is a Powerful player. I want him to be rewarded for going out of his comfort zone and working on his game. If he has a meh game, I am more confident in Jones being able to cover.
Barclay has played well against Ireland and it would be a shame to ditch him. Bar CDP (and watson

- General Zod
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: 6 Nations
What's the score with dickinson's injury?
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: 6 Nations
He's fucked for a while yet.General Zod wrote:What's the score with dickinson's injury?
I am not convinced the scrum problems were all down to our props rather that some clever (sometimes illegal but no issues with that tbh) Irish scrummaging. There was one scrum on our 5 that we got a decent nudge on them back. I still would play Reid and Ford though.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: 6 Nations
After all that, it looks like Ronan O'Gara who doesn't have a leg to stand on rather than Conor Murray.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: 6 Nations
Haha, jesus Woot, that's awful.Stones of granite wrote:After all that, it looks like Ronan O'Gara who doesn't have a leg to stand on rather than Conor Murray.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Haha, jesus Woot, that's awful.Stones of granite wrote:After all that, it looks like Ronan O'Gara who doesn't have a leg to stand on rather than Conor Murray.

- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Best? He flung away 3 line-outs in the Scotland 22 and went AWOL in the loose? And that's before his abject performance as captain. How the feck does he get in there?Big D wrote:ESPN GB+I team of the week:
Hogg
North
Henshaw - Nope. Both of the Scots, English and French centres had better games.
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best - me arse!
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss
Idle Feck
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Itoje is also a very questionable choice. Picamoles was also very imposing and should be in there ahead of Strauss.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Best? He flung away 3 line-outs in the Scotland 22 and went AWOL in the loose? And that's before his abject performance as captain. How the feck does he get in there?Big D wrote:ESPN GB+I team of the week:
Hogg
North
Henshaw - Nope. Both of the Scots, English and French centres had better games.
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best - me arse!
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Only if Picamoles became eligible for the Lions. Was aa GB+I XVAdder wrote:Itoje is also a very questionable choice. Picamoles was also very imposing and should be in there ahead of Strauss.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Best? He flung away 3 line-outs in the Scotland 22 and went AWOL in the loose? And that's before his abject performance as captain. How the feck does he get in there?Big D wrote:ESPN GB+I team of the week:
Hogg
North
Henshaw - Nope. Both of the Scots, English and French centres had better games.
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best - me arse!
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss

Agree about Itoje.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Ah yes, I was on a team of the week Approach.Big D wrote:Only if Picamoles became eligible for the Lions. Was aa GB+I XVAdder wrote:Itoje is also a very questionable choice. Picamoles was also very imposing and should be in there ahead of Strauss.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:
Best? He flung away 3 line-outs in the Scotland 22 and went AWOL in the loose? And that's before his abject performance as captain. How the feck does he get in there?
Agree about Itoje.

I will share this anyway:
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: 6 Nations
No idea how Best got in there to be fair. Maybe ESPN was having a laugh.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:Best? He flung away 3 line-outs in the Scotland 22 and went AWOL in the loose? And that's before his abject performance as captain. How the feck does he get in there?Big D wrote:ESPN GB+I team of the week:
Hogg
North
Henshaw - Nope. Both of the Scots, English and French centres had better games.
Williams
Daly
Jackson
Laidlaw
Evans
Best - me arse!
Furlong
Gray squared
Itoje
Warburton
Strauss
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: 6 Nations
I like to think you've spent the weekend sidling up to strangers in bars and accosting them with that joke, no introduction, no hello, just that joke, then without breaking eye contact backing away slowly making pistol gestures at them with both your hands.Stones of granite wrote:Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Haha, jesus Woot, that's awful.Stones of granite wrote:After all that, it looks like Ronan O'Gara who doesn't have a leg to stand on rather than Conor Murray.
- Vengeful Glutton
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
- Location: Circle No.3
Re: 6 Nations
That hoary old chestnut eh? Your scrum was rinsed.Big D wrote:He's fucked for a while yet.General Zod wrote:What's the score with dickinson's injury?
I am not convinced the scrum problems were all down to our props rather that some clever (sometimes illegal but no issues with that tbh) Irish scrummaging. There was one scrum on our 5 that we got a decent nudge on them back. I still would play Reid and Ford though.
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
Est vir qui adest!
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Fuck all points for winning scrums (illegally).
- Vengeful Glutton
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 2:36 pm
- Location: Circle No.3
Re: 6 Nations
Rinsed baby. Rinsed.OptimisticJock wrote:Fuck all points for winning scrums (illegally).
Quid est veritas?
Est vir qui adest!
Est vir qui adest!
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: 6 Nations
Ah now hey! If we can pick CJ and Strauss, you can let Adder have Picamoles as an honorary Taff.Big D wrote:
Only if Picamoles became eligible for the Lions. Was aa GB+I XV
Agree about Itoje.
Idle Feck