Right, self-appointed expert on all things Middle Eastern, tell us what the people of this region are fighting over which is not the result, directly or indirectly, of the West. I'd be interested in your views on this.Digby wrote:That's quite a specific point you're choosing to contest about ISIS attacking Turkey, I'm not off the top of my sold I'll have ever made the point you're countering either. For what it's worth I don't think the people of the Middle East will speak with one voice, so some will agree with you and some not, and there are a lot of problems in the Middle East even before the actions of the west are considered, or put another way of the west vanished tomorrow it wouldn't mean peace in the Middle East as they're fighting for lots of reason only some of which are actions or perceived actions of the west.rowan wrote: I'd go out on a limb and suggest most people in the Middle East would. That's because I live here, talk to the locals every day, speaking their language and read the local press. So you think ISIS has been attacking Sunni majority Turkey when they have a pro-Sunni agenda? If you came here and spouted that nonsense you'd been laughed out of town.
So who's the hypocrite here?![]()
Meanwhile, Turkey - according to the mainsteam media's propaganda - has been one of the primary targets for ISIS attacks, so this is a very useful case study. Again, why on earth would ISIS attack a Sunni Muslim stronghold? Why hasn't it officially claimed most of the attacks attributed to it. Concidentally, Turkey is still actively bombing people in Syria, and has reacted angrily to American support for Kurdish militants who were to the fore in fighting so-called ISIS (Saudi's Jihadis & America's mercenaries). It's a ridiculous notion that falls apart under scrutiny and thereby begins to unravel the entire 'ISIS' narrative...