1872 Cup Champions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Rumour on Edinburgh forum that Sam Johnson is headed east. No idea source etc. so take with a pinch of salt.
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Glasgow have a centre or two not under contract next season. He's not one of them.Big D wrote:Rumour on Edinburgh forum that Sam Johnson is headed east. No idea source etc. so take with a pinch of salt.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Wouldn't be the 1st (or probably last) time a player in contract changed SRU clubs. That being said, as stated I was just repeating what appears to be an unfounded rumour.hp18 wrote:Glasgow have a centre or two not under contract next season. He's not one of them.Big D wrote:Rumour on Edinburgh forum that Sam Johnson is headed east. No idea source etc. so take with a pinch of salt.
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Not scenarios you can really compare. Johnson has just broken through and is making his mark at Glasgow.Big D wrote:Wouldn't be the 1st (or probably last) time a player in contract changed SRU clubs. That being said, as stated I was just repeating what appears to be an unfounded rumour.hp18 wrote:Glasgow have a centre or two not under contract next season. He's not one of them.Big D wrote:Rumour on Edinburgh forum that Sam Johnson is headed east. No idea source etc. so take with a pinch of salt.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Not sad to see Tonks go. There's a good player in there somewhere but it's never quite all come together for him. I wonder if this means we'll see some of Te Rue before the end of the season? I reckon we've got plenty of (poor) full-back cover with Kinghorn, Brown, McClennan and Cuthbert to return from injury.
Pleased for Ford. If you like living somewhere and earn a decent wage then why move? The grass isn't always greener. If he's challenged by McInally and Turner so much the better.
Pleased for Ford. If you like living somewhere and earn a decent wage then why move? The grass isn't always greener. If he's challenged by McInally and Turner so much the better.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Rory Scholes is confirmed.
To be honest Petrie has some work to do. His other signing would have been practically handed to him by the SRU. He is in the paper claiming Edinburgh are a buying club....
To be honest Petrie has some work to do. His other signing would have been practically handed to him by the SRU. He is in the paper claiming Edinburgh are a buying club....
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Is he even qualified? I don't think we (the scottish clubs) should be buying non qualified at that level of quality. If they are NSQ and actually improve the team & the squad then fair enough but I don't see how that signing falls in that category?Big D wrote:Rory Scholes is confirmed.
To be honest Petrie has some work to do. His other signing would have been practically handed to him by the SRU. He is in the paper claiming Edinburgh are a buying club....
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Have to agree with this. At that age they're still requiring development (and potentially) stifling a jocks development.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Is he even qualified? I don't think we (the scottish clubs) should be buying non qualified at that level of quality. If they are NSQ and actually improve the team & the squad then fair enough but I don't see how that signing falls in that category?Big D wrote:Rory Scholes is confirmed.
To be honest Petrie has some work to do. His other signing would have been practically handed to him by the SRU. He is in the paper claiming Edinburgh are a buying club....
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
I completely agree.OptimisticJock wrote:Have to agree with this. At that age they're still requiring development (and potentially) stifling a jocks development.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Is he even qualified? I don't think we (the scottish clubs) should be buying non qualified at that level of quality. If they are NSQ and actually improve the team & the squad then fair enough but I don't see how that signing falls in that category?Big D wrote:Rory Scholes is confirmed.
To be honest Petrie has some work to do. His other signing would have been practically handed to him by the SRU. He is in the paper claiming Edinburgh are a buying club....
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Solomons is honestly one of the worst recruiters & selectors I have come across in Scottish rugby.
It's a completely different matter if they signed Trimble or Bowe for example who would improve that team significantly.
I really wish Edinburgh would take a leaf out of Glasgow's book, I want to see both clubs run well.
It's a completely different matter if they signed Trimble or Bowe for example who would improve that team significantly.
I really wish Edinburgh would take a leaf out of Glasgow's book, I want to see both clubs run well.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
I've never understood the need to get worked up about something that hasn't happened yet.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Solomons is honestly one of the worst recruiters & selectors I have come across in Scottish rugby.
It's a completely different matter if they signed Trimble or Bowe for example who would improve that team significantly.
I really wish Edinburgh would take a leaf out of Glasgow's book, I want to see both clubs run well.
Edit... Sorry Greg, that wasn't meant to be directed at your post. Was just a general statement about giving out about someone we haven't seen play for us yet.
- Chunks Baws
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 am
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Can't say I've seen the lad play but Ulster fans on social media aren't happy. They are tipping him to replace Bowe/Trimble.
-
- Posts: 2301
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Not a signing that's going to sell tickets but I don't mind us taking the odd punt on this type of player. We do need something for fans to get excited about though. I'm on board with trying to grow a team but one marquee signing can have a big impact. Still time though.
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
That's a decent back line though.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
That's what 18/23 SQ? 5 of that pack are 24 or younger and 6 of the backline 25 or younger. With most, I think signed up for next season.OptimisticJock wrote:Clearly Berghan doesn't tickle the baws when dishing oot the gobbles.
That's a decent back line though.
Still a couple of issues with the side though.
-
- Posts: 12138
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Has Coman done one?
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Genuinely pleased you pointed that out. The narrative in my head says we are rammers with NSQ, and always will be.Big D wrote:That's what 18/23 SQ? 5 of that pack are 24 or younger and 6 of the backline 25 or younger. With most, I think signed up for next season.OptimisticJock wrote:Clearly Berghan doesn't tickle the baws when dishing oot the gobbles.
That's a decent back line though.
Still a couple of issues with the side though.
I'm with you on that Baz, really wish we would start Berghan.
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
I count 18 plus CdP. But at least if we're going to miss out on top 6 it's young SQ players that are getting game time*.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Genuinely pleased you pointed that out. The narrative in my head says we are rammers with NSQ, and always will be.Big D wrote:That's what 18/23 SQ? 5 of that pack are 24 or younger and 6 of the backline 25 or younger. With most, I think signed up for next season.OptimisticJock wrote:Clearly Berghan doesn't tickle the baws when dishing oot the gobbles.
That's a decent back line though.
Still a couple of issues with the side though.
I'm with you on that Baz, really wish we would start Berghan.
*In no way is this to be taken as supportive to AS selection policies which as we know are questionable.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: RE: Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Ha... Nice bolt on caveat. I might add that to my signature thingee on this forum.Big D wrote:I count 18 plus CdP. But at least if we're going to miss out on top 6 it's young SQ players that are getting game time*.Edinburgh in Exile wrote:Genuinely pleased you pointed that out. The narrative in my head says we are rammers with NSQ, and always will be.Big D wrote:
That's what 18/23 SQ? 5 of that pack are 24 or younger and 6 of the backline 25 or younger. With most, I think signed up for next season.
Still a couple of issues with the side though.
I'm with you on that Baz, really wish we would start Berghan.
*In no way is this to be taken as supportive to AS selection policies which as we know are questionable.
Yeah, looking at our run in, I'd say we are cooked, we've just been way too inconsistent this season.
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Inconsistently better than inconsistently mince
-
- Posts: 5595
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Think there are some loose definitions of come through the system and of the 3 that are "the majority of the way through SQ 'project' qualification" Burleigh and Bressler wouldn't be my near a Scotland shirt for me so I count them as non project players.Stolen from Edinburgh forum wrote: Of Edinburgh's starting 15 tonight:
10 have come through the Academy system and/or Edinburgh is their only pro club
8 have come through the ER system in the last two years
11 are SQ, a further 3 are the majority of the way through SQ 'project' qualification, 1 is NSQ
9 are Scots-born (I think)
8 grew up in the club's catchment area
Not bad, considering we have a further 5 players unavailable due to Scottish international duty, and several SQ players injured...
7/8 on bench are SQ too.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Burleigh could become SQ?
Kill it! Kill it with fire!
Kill it! Kill it with fire!
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Based on this season, you're better off with Scholes. Whether he can maintain his form, I don't know, but then he's got room to improve as well and should do so with regular game time.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:Solomons is honestly one of the worst recruiters & selectors I have come across in Scottish rugby.
It's a completely different matter if they signed Trimble or Bowe for example who would improve that team significantly.
I really wish Edinburgh would take a leaf out of Glasgow's book, I want to see both clubs run well.
I can get not wanting to give time to non-special non-Scottish players, but he looks a solid Pro 12 player at least and is potentially special.
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Anyone watching?
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Re: Solly's Soul Destroyers
Found it on my computer. I like Chris Paterson as a commentator