V Highlanders
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: V Highlanders
Daly and Payne are interesting ones given they could viably be the best back 3 options too.
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: V Highlanders
JJ had a good game going forward, but two bump offs haven't helped him. But if you are bothered by defence at 13, Daly isn't your man. Backline outside 10 all in the air for me; I'd likely have Teo at 12 at present.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:A fair crack of the app doesn't currently see JJ start. I'd currently have him behind JD2 and I'm no fan of his and very much a fan of JJ. Given I'd be starting Henshaw at 12 I'd pick Payne at 13 for the Maori if he's fit but it seems to me he isn't, or failing that Daly.Stom wrote:I think it's quite even between the bench loosies. And I thought Stander did his chances no favours. In fact, I'd suggest we're more likely to see one of Tipuric or SOB in the 20 shirt.Numbers wrote:
I would imagine that McGrath will be on the bench for the tests at worst, also Sinckler, Rory Best won't be in the test mix as far as I can see as all he has really done is cement his reputation for choking on the throw, Stander has a decent chance of making the bench.
I also think (hope) that 13 is still up for grabs, with Joseph hopefully getting a fair crack of the whip.
-
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: V Highlanders
Not sure you'd say that about Payne post Tuesday- put in a great tackle, but laboured a bit I thought. I do like Daly in the back three, but wing by preference,Mikey Brown wrote:Daly and Payne are interesting ones given they could viably be the best back 3 options too.
- Stom
- Posts: 5819
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: V Highlanders
Organisational skills for one.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:What is it you think he does less well than Robshaw?Stom wrote:Tempting, but I'd worry about balance in that backrow against NZ. SOB can be a great player to have, but he's not a POM, Robshaw, etc...Numbers wrote:
I'd have SOB at 6 as it stands currently.
Defending the fringe (but SOB doesn't usually do this, does he, so I guess we don't really know...)
And as the selection proves, Gatland agrees, with SOB and POM together. I like glue at 6. If they also have a hard carrying game and linking hands, then of course I'd pick them, but primarily I want glue.
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: V Highlanders
Why Stom? Why did you start this?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: V Highlanders
Will if you agree with Gatland...Stom wrote:Organisational skills for one.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:What is it you think he does less well than Robshaw?Stom wrote:
Tempting, but I'd worry about balance in that backrow against NZ. SOB can be a great player to have, but he's not a POM, Robshaw, etc...
Defending the fringe (but SOB doesn't usually do this, does he, so I guess we don't really know...)
And as the selection proves, Gatland agrees, with SOB and POM together. I like glue at 6. If they also have a hard carrying game and linking hands, then of course I'd pick them, but primarily I want glue.
As for "glue" at 6, if that means anything then it's provided by Warburton at 7.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: V Highlanders
How is Tipuric not in the frame?
-
- Posts: 11975
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: V Highlanders
6. Robshaw (c) 7. Tipuric 8. Denton
No question about it.
No question about it.
- bruce
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:22 pm
Re: V Highlanders
Gatland.Mikey Brown wrote:How is Tipuric not in the frame?