v All Blacks III: the Decider
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
- skidger
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
I am with Puja. Can see the Lions winning again or a similar score line to the 3rd test in 1993. Best wishes - Trevor Brooking.
-
- Posts: 938
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
That's typically how things go on modern NH three tests tours of NZ. The second test is the closest and the third the most lopsided.Puja wrote:Yeah, they didn't make a huge impression on England in 2014 for the first two tests and then horsed us in the third.
2012 NZL vs IRE II: 19-3 (+16)
2012 NZL vs IRE III: 60-0 (+60)
2014 NZL vs ENG II: 28-27 (+1)
2014 NZL vs ENG III: 36-13 (+23)
2016 NZL vs WAL II: 36-22 (+14)
2016 NZL vs WAL III: 46-6 (+40)
2013 France are the anomaly in that their first test was the closest (23-13), while they got pantsed slightly more in the second test (30-0) than the third (24-9).
While the Lions are obviously stronger in depth than any of those individual sides, it does suggest a general trend in All Black performances, and NH fatigue, over a series, I think.
So the Lions get 57% possession and 62% territory against the Crusaders and "hosed" them. Whereas the All Blacks get 61% possession and 62% territory against the Lions in the first test and "made no impression". I see.paddy no 11 wrote:It wasn't all that bad, retaalick won a few turnovers etc. Apparently lions done 2 sessions the Thursday before which would explain that. Lions hosed the crusaders which had a significant intl presence
- Puja
- Posts: 17789
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Mind, stats are misleading for that England tour, as we deserved a draw in the first test and lost it through a moment of not paying attention to let in a try, whereas the second test NZ were always in control and we scored a late converted try to make it look as though we'd run you close.zer0 wrote:That's typically how things go on modern NH three tests tours of NZ. The second test is the closest and the third the most lopsided.Puja wrote:Yeah, they didn't make a huge impression on England in 2014 for the first two tests and then horsed us in the third.
2012 NZL vs IRE II: 19-3 (+16)
2012 NZL vs IRE III: 60-0 (+60)
2014 NZL vs ENG II: 28-27 (+1)
2014 NZL vs ENG III: 36-13 (+23)
2016 NZL vs WAL II: 36-22 (+14)
2016 NZL vs WAL III: 46-6 (+40)
2013 France are the anomaly in that their first test was the closest (23-13), while they got pantsed slightly more in the second test (30-0) than the third (24-9).
While the Lions are obviously stronger in depth than any of those individual sides, it does suggest a general trend in All Black performances, and NH fatigue, over a series, I think.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
So it's been raining on and off all morning. The ground (well, my "lawn") is saturated but Eden Park does drain well. It will at best be greasy under foot.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2308
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Aye. I'm not sure that I can see lightning strike in the same place twice. However the revolving door that is the ABs midfield selection policy and as been a full back as one could imagine makes me think we could sneak itskidger wrote:I am with Puja. Can see the Lions winning again or a similar score line to the 3rd test in 1993. Best wishes - Trevor Brooking.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Love that the series is in the balance. Game fckin on!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:35 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Can the Lions win? certainly.
Will they? if they take their chances, yes, if not, no. The all blacks will take their chances, that is the difference. As we saw in the first test.
Will they? if they take their chances, yes, if not, no. The all blacks will take their chances, that is the difference. As we saw in the first test.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Bright sunshine alternating with heavy showers.
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Surely it is cheating to play at a ground they never lose at. One maybe but twice? Devalued series win.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3812
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Literally in the back row. Great atmosphere!


______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Dear god this UK coverage is appalling. The Welsh bloke sounds like he's literally pissing himself with excitement.
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:50 pm
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
At least 2 missed tackles from Farrell so far.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Another mistake
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Faz having a tricky start
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Another mistake
- Stom
- Posts: 5844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
So far NZs best player is Owen Farrell...
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
That fwcking miss pass!!
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
winger had free jump..positioning again..
AB 7-0 after 16m.
AB 7-0 after 16m.
- Stom
- Posts: 5844
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
So far, it's 14 men vs 16 men. Farrell has missed 2 tackles, kicked out on the full, tried to grubber through a ruck, and passed straight to the opposition.
I'm sorry, but surely this has to be the end of his "Iceman" reputation...
I'm sorry, but surely this has to be the end of his "Iceman" reputation...
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
both sides playing, love it
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
How long until Barnes tells us Farrell is world class?
-
- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
Yeah but he's kicked a pen so all is goodStom wrote:So far, it's 14 men vs 16 men. Farrell has missed 2 tackles, kicked out on the full, tried to grubber through a ruck, and passed straight to the opposition.
I'm sorry, but surely this has to be the end of his "Iceman" reputation...
- Galfon
- Posts: 4297
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: v All Blacks III: the Decider
again, jd2 standing out as highest-level hombre.
7-3..pen.Faz.
7-3..pen.Faz.