Filthy little fecker.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9354
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Only resigning from the cabinet, so no by-election being triggered.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Which begs the question why was his behaviour below the standard of a cabinet minister but acceptable for an MP? Other than it being claimed as acceptable in the 80s
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Perhaps, in the context of a SoS for Defence at a time when their are emerging stories of sexual impropriety on board RN submarines?Digby wrote:Which begs the question why was his behaviour below the standard of a cabinet minister but acceptable for an MP? Other than it being claimed as acceptable in the 80s
Alternatively, he may fear there are other stories waiting to break and he is reducing his target profile.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9354
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Filthy little fecker.
He also says that "most" of the allegations are untrue, which means that he's involved in multiple allegations, and that at least one of them is true, and bad enough to resign over.
As for acceptable for a minister, but not cabinet minister - that's pure fudge to protect the Tory "majority"
As for acceptable for a minister, but not cabinet minister - that's pure fudge to protect the Tory "majority"
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16082
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
From what I’ve read, he is spinning it - the knee touching/grabbing/fondling - as holding himself to the same standards as those expected of military personnel. There’s also rumours that there is more to come and he going before they come to light.
The sad little man who represents Sheffield Hallam must be delighted this has stolen his thunder.
The sad little man who represents Sheffield Hallam must be delighted this has stolen his thunder.
-
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
-
- Posts: 6486
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
He's going before some serious shit hits the fan.
But i dont get this - "He told the BBC that what had been "acceptable 15, 10 years ago is clearly not acceptable now".
bad behaviour wasnt acceptable 10-15 years ago either. fact is now it looks like you will be less likely to get away with it.
But i dont get this - "He told the BBC that what had been "acceptable 15, 10 years ago is clearly not acceptable now".
bad behaviour wasnt acceptable 10-15 years ago either. fact is now it looks like you will be less likely to get away with it.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Not many of us have...OptimisticJock wrote: he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16082
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
ThankfullyStones of granite wrote:Not many of us have...OptimisticJock wrote: he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Yes it is. Though equally I don't see Labour in a rush to trigger by-elections where their MPs have behaved badly. A plague on both their housesWhich Tyler wrote: As for acceptable for a minister, but not cabinet minister - that's pure fudge to protect the Tory "majority"
-
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Never lived.Stones of granite wrote:Not many of us have...OptimisticJock wrote: he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16082
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Whilst Lord Rennard still resides in the Lords and plenty a male MSP gets away with all sorts of stuff in the Sports and Social. As with expenses no party will come out if this well.Digby wrote:Yes it is. Though equally I don't see Labour in a rush to trigger by-elections where their MPs have behaved badly. A plague on both their housesWhich Tyler wrote: As for acceptable for a minister, but not cabinet minister - that's pure fudge to protect the Tory "majority"
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16082
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Has everyone seen the leaked, unredacted list? If true, it would seem Kwasi Kwarteng has been a busy boy. Though why having consensual relationship is deemed as unacceptable behaviour is beyond me. Boris also seems disappointingly underrepresented.
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Or a night in with the Mortars!!!OptimisticJock wrote: he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
Idle Feck
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
As an erstwhile OC Recce, I can say that nights out with Ginge, Garfield and Boring Bob left a lot to be desired. I had more fun being mortared in Baghdad.OptimisticJock wrote:Never lived.Stones of granite wrote:Not many of us have...OptimisticJock wrote: he's clearly never been on a night out with a recce pl.
Idle Feck
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9354
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Nope, and no particular desire to see it TBH.Mellsblue wrote:Has everyone seen the leaked, unredacted list? If true, it would seem Kwasi Kwarteng has been a busy boy. Though why having consensual relationship is deemed as unacceptable behaviour is beyond me. Boris also seems disappointingly underrepresented.
As for things like consensual relationships counting - I get the impression that the list is basically the party whips' dirt they hold to "encourage" MPs to keep in line, and so that they can be prepared if any scandal breaks or "blackmail" is tried. So anything that could embarassing the MP is on there.
-
- Posts: 2275
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Don't tar all recce pl by their standards.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:As an erstwhile OC Recce, I can say that nights out with Ginge, Garfield and Boring Bob left a lot to be desired. I had more fun being mortared in Baghdad.OptimisticJock wrote:Never lived.Stones of granite wrote: Not many of us have...
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16082
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Filthy little fecker.
You don’t want to see exhibit A that has caused this fuss?!?!? To see the facts rather than the spin each party and newspaper will put on it.Which Tyler wrote:Nope, and no particular desire to see it TBH.Mellsblue wrote:Has everyone seen the leaked, unredacted list? If true, it would seem Kwasi Kwarteng has been a busy boy. Though why having consensual relationship is deemed as unacceptable behaviour is beyond me. Boris also seems disappointingly underrepresented.
As for things like consensual relationships counting - I get the impression that the list is basically the party whips' dirt they hold to "encourage" MPs to keep in line, and so that they can be prepared if any scandal breaks or "blackmail" is tried. So anything that could embarassing the MP is on there.
It is a leaked list from whips office to help keep people in line. However, it seems to have quickly morphed in to a definitive list of Westminster sex pests. Something it most definitely isn’t.
There is also some delicious irony that the keepers of said list are those who have most benfitted from it.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9354
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Correct. It's a list of allegations a good half of which are likely untrue, and almost entirely of no particular interest to me.
If there's anything truly explosive in there, I'll start paying attention once the victims start coming forward, corroborating things and pressing charges.
It comes as no surprise whatsoever to me that people in power are a bunch of arseholes, given that that's my default position.
If there's anything truly explosive in there, I'll start paying attention once the victims start coming forward, corroborating things and pressing charges.
It comes as no surprise whatsoever to me that people in power are a bunch of arseholes, given that that's my default position.
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
One at least is an allegation that one MP has 'impregnated' his secretary who he lives with and has a child with. Living over the brush! Never been so insulted etc etcWhich Tyler wrote:Correct. It's a list of allegations a good half of which are likely untrue, and almost entirely of no particular interest to me.
If there's anything truly explosive in there, I'll start paying attention once the victims start coming forward, corroborating things and pressing charges.
It comes as no surprise whatsoever to me that people in power are a bunch of arseholes, given that that's my default position.
-
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Not sure about that. These are well educated, adult women and men sharing their experiences whilst working for these scum bags.Which Tyler wrote:Correct. It's a list of allegations a good half of which are likely untrue,
-
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Filthy little fecker.
Michael Portillo was on TW last night. He was bemoaning the loss to the art world of the brilliance of Kevin Spacey.
He than went on to suggest art should be separated from the individual. What a spectacularly pretentious knut.
He than went on to suggest art should be separated from the individual. What a spectacularly pretentious knut.