England vs Argentina

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Ben farking Youngs
twitchy
Posts: 3294
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by twitchy »

lol
Danno
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Danno »

Hahaha. I hope this stands
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Owen farking Farrell, TMO pending
Banquo
Posts: 19263
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Banquo »

faz fail
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:27 pm Owen farking Farrell, TMO pending
Harsh. I think that’s a knock on.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12201
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mikey Brown »

Haha. A touch so small it doesn’t change the flight of the ball clearly wouldn’t matter anyway.
Last edited by Mikey Brown on Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 19263
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Banquo »

pretty sure he touched it tho
Danno
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Danno »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:27 pm Owen farking Farrell, TMO pending
Why's he calling to the ref instead of getting after the ball ffs
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Danno wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:29 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:27 pm Owen farking Farrell, TMO pending
Why's he calling to the ref instead of getting after the ball ffs
Agreed.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:29 pm Haha. A touch so small it doesn’t change the flight of the ball clearly wouldn’t matter anyway.
I think it does change the flight, albeit not enough for it to miss Billy by that much.
Danno
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Danno »

JVP!
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12201
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mikey Brown »

Hmm. Couldn’t really see it, but then again I’m biased.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12201
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mikey Brown »

Oh look. A fast guy.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

It all makes sense now. 55 mins of stodge at 9 lulled them into a false sense of security. Brilliant.
Last edited by Mellsblue on Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:32 pm Oh look. A fast guy.
:lol:
twitchy
Posts: 3294
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by twitchy »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:32 pm Oh look. A fast guy.
:shock:
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Possibly the most naturally talented player in attack that Eng have had in goodness knows how long and all Smith is tasked with is pulling the ball back to Farrell or Nowell. Sigh.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17779
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Puja »

We just look so much more urgent and alive with JVP at 9. He's taking at least a second off every ruck compared to Youngs.

Smith looks like no-one's played with him before. He keeps getting the ball, looking for a pass and every other member of his team has overrun and gone past him. It's bizarre. I genuinely don't think our backline would look significantly worse if we just took Smith off and played with 14 - that's not a criticism of Smith, but of everyone else who just isn't offering him anything.

Puja
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 19263
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Banquo »

Brain dead LCD.
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2461
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:43 pmBrain dead LCD.
Bok or french forward level smarts.
Banquo
Posts: 19263
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:43 pm We just look so much more urgent and alive with JVP at 9. He's taking at least a second off every ruck compared to Youngs.

Smith looks like no-one's played with him before. He keeps getting the ball, looking for a pass and every other member of his team has overrun and gone past him. It's bizarre. I genuinely don't think our backline would look significantly worse if we just took Smith off and played with 14 - that's not a criticism of Smith, but of everyone else who just isn't offering him anything.

Puja
yep,,so much better. and agreed on smith
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14575
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Mellsblue »

Looking forward to the 9/10 Farrell rating citing his kicking % in tomorrows papers.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17779
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Puja »

Why isn't Willis on already? It's not as though he's lightning or anything, but part of our problem with being slow can surely be amended by getting one of our locks off. Preferably Itoje so we don't have to keep listening to him Wilhelm scream every time he thinks he's had a foul play done to him.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6413
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: England vs Argentina

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:23 pm
Oakboy wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:16 pm
Banquo wrote: Sun Nov 06, 2022 3:13 pm

He's making good yards and distributing well, but needs to be less ambitious with a wet ball. He is a high quality 8.
Is or was?
is
Ah, good for 55 min, you mean! :D
Post Reply