Yeah that was brilliantwelshsaint wrote:Find it ironically amusing that Jones refers to Arthur or Martha, which is a long held gay taunt.
He's even more value than Gats was for being a dumbass when he speaks
Moderator: Sandydragon
Yeah that was brilliantwelshsaint wrote:Find it ironically amusing that Jones refers to Arthur or Martha, which is a long held gay taunt.
Certainly looks like an outbreak of foot in mouth disease, they should both have had the sense to stay very very quiet. Now they both look very very stupid.welshsaint wrote:Find it ironically amusing that Jones refers to Arthur or Martha, which is a long held gay taunt.
Entirely agree. Sometimes not making a statement is more effective. Either way, trading verbal blows between two national coaches over an issue like this just looks a bit tawdry. After his intervention earlier in the week. Gatland should seriously consider when to keep his mouth shut.Curry Puff wrote:Certainly looks like an outbreak of foot in mouth disease, they should both have had the sense to stay very very quiet. Now they both look very very stupid.welshsaint wrote:Find it ironically amusing that Jones refers to Arthur or Martha, which is a long held gay taunt.
I agree, I don't think Gatland is an appropriate mouthpiece for the WRU, he lacks the media savvy for a start.Sandydragon wrote:Entirely agree. Sometimes not making a statement is more effective. Either way, trading verbal blows between two national coaches over an issue like this just looks a bit tawdry. After his intervention earlier in the week. Gatland should seriously consider when to keep his mouth shut.Curry Puff wrote:Certainly looks like an outbreak of foot in mouth disease, they should both have had the sense to stay very very quiet. Now they both look very very stupid.welshsaint wrote:Find it ironically amusing that Jones refers to Arthur or Martha, which is a long held gay taunt.
I think you could get moderately p*ssed following those rules.whatisthejava wrote:DOes anyone want to play the racist drinking game
Its really simple
When John Invertwat mentions this happened and then instantly asks Gusgott for his opinion (because he is black ) - drink
There is no winner, just an emptiness
He would have been better off, in my opinion, stating some thing like 'Marler apologies to Lee and as far as the team is concerned that's the end of the matter. We have a big game to prepare for, blah blah blah, and we will let the rugby authorities do their thing. In other news, rumours that there are players in possession of compromising photographs involving myself, Rob Howley and several farmyard animals are compleely false and in no way do they influence selection'.Sourdust wrote:I agree that Gatland should have kept schtum, but I think I can see how he was trapped into saying something. He would have been desperate to avoid looking like he was grasping at straws after a bad performance. We've all seen it before; players, coaches and fans being castigated for "sour grapes" etc. when protesting something obviously bad immediately after a defeat. So when given the chance to put the boot into England, he thought better of it and decided to say something conciliatory instead, hoping to be seen as defusing the situation and not attempting to deflect blame from himself. In many other circumstances he would have received credit for such an approach. Here, obviously, it was a bad call and "no comment" was really the only response which would have worked.
I'm pretty sure that the "banter" comment came a couple of days after the game and even after his initial reaction to the comment. He'd done pretty well in his first comments and then stuffed it up.Sourdust wrote:I agree that Gatland should have kept schtum, but I think I can see how he was trapped into saying something. He would have been desperate to avoid looking like he was grasping at straws after a bad performance. We've all seen it before; players, coaches and fans being castigated for "sour grapes" etc. when protesting something obviously bad immediately after a defeat. So when given the chance to put the boot into England, he thought better of it and decided to say something conciliatory instead, hoping to be seen as defusing the situation and not attempting to deflect blame from himself. In many other circumstances he would have received credit for such an approach. Here, obviously, it was a bad call and "no comment" was really the only response which would have worked.
Did he buy you a drink after or you him?kk67 wrote:I've been homophobic on the pitch. Blokey tackling me got a handful of my 'nards.....I shout loudly, 'get off my b*llocks ,you f*cking Poof'. He let go.
True story.
I'm with Nighty......f*ck this sh*t. This is full contact sport....of course it's going to get fractious.
He was a handsome young lad,.......pretty boys always have issues.gthedog wrote:Did he buy you a drink after or you him?kk67 wrote:I've been homophobic on the pitch. Blokey tackling me got a handful of my 'nards.....I shout loudly, 'get off my b*llocks ,you f*cking Poof'. He let go.
True story.
I'm with Nighty......f*ck this sh*t. This is full contact sport....of course it's going to get fractious.
You bought then you tartkk67 wrote:He was a handsome young lad,.......pretty boys always have issues.gthedog wrote:Did he buy you a drink after or you him?kk67 wrote:I've been homophobic on the pitch. Blokey tackling me got a handful of my 'nards.....I shout loudly, 'get off my b*llocks ,you f*cking Poof'. He let go.
True story.
I'm with Nighty......f*ck this sh*t. This is full contact sport....of course it's going to get fractious.
I have also accidentally been the deliverer of a cheap shot to the bollys. It does happen.gthedog wrote:You bought then you tartkk67 wrote:He was a handsome young lad,.......pretty boys always have issues.gthedog wrote:
Did he buy you a drink after or you him?
He was. And I think many of us admit that was out of order.francoisfou wrote:Wasn't former Welsh coach Gareth Jenkins called 'gypo' a few years back by his fellow countrymen??
When are we getting a "rep" button?whatisthejava wrote:DOes anyone want to play the racist drinking game
Its really simple
When John Invertwat mentions this happened and then instantly asks Gusgott for his opinion (because he is black ) - drink
There is no winner, just an emptiness
And it did actually happen. Good old predictable Invertw@.Billyfish wrote:When are we getting a "rep" button?whatisthejava wrote:DOes anyone want to play the racist drinking game
Its really simple
When John Invertwat mentions this happened and then instantly asks Gusgott for his opinion (because he is black ) - drink
There is no winner, just an emptiness
Like!