Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 5576
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Lions
Might not need a long one, but this is effectively the end of a season that started with the end of the 19/20 season post lockdown 1. Both should be told they are taking time off.no sleep wrote:Was really pleased to see Russell come on and completely change the game.
Don't think Fagerson will need much rest. Or Watson.
-
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yep. Russell really turned my feelings on this whole tour around to be honest. Seeing the talent of repeatedly putting runners on to a good pass make such a difference to the side, one seemingly so desperate to not play any rugby, was nice. It wasn’t enough but that game was there to be won. The Bokkes suddenly had to consider not letting us have the ball rather than just giving it back without a care.
He wasn’t flawless but his all round game was very strong and his positives far, far outweighed the cost of the dropped high ball and pen conceded. Fantastic goal kicking too.
He wasn’t flawless but his all round game was very strong and his positives far, far outweighed the cost of the dropped high ball and pen conceded. Fantastic goal kicking too.
Re: Lions
You're right; I'd forgotten what a mess the pro season was. Just looking forward to my club starting playing.Big D wrote:Might not need a long one, but this is effectively the end of a season that started with the end of the 19/20 season post lockdown 1. Both should be told they are taking time off.no sleep wrote:Was really pleased to see Russell come on and completely change the game.
Don't think Fagerson will need much rest. Or Watson.
Re: Lions
Will never know, but I do wonder how the series would have gone if he'd been fit for the start. I reckon that performance would have got Russell the starting spot and we'd have been much more likely to play the rugby we needed to.Mikey Brown wrote:Yep. Russell really turned my feelings on this whole tour around to be honest. Seeing the talent of repeatedly putting runners on to a good pass make such a difference to the side, one seemingly so desperate to not play any rugby, was nice. It wasn’t enough but that game was there to be won. The Bokkes suddenly had to consider not letting us have the ball rather than just giving it back without a care.
He wasn’t flawless but his all round game was very strong and his positives far, far outweighed the cost of the dropped high ball and pen conceded. Fantastic goal kicking too.
Not sure there was a midfield combination capable of carrying it through though - would have loved to see Russell - Farrell - Aki just for the fun of it.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Lions
Even if Russell had been fully fit, you can bet your boots that Gatland would not have started him. He does after all, think for himself. Why do you rate Farrell so highly? He was a disaster on tour and offered nothing. Even cement-head Gatland had the wit to drop him from the 23. Henshaw was by some distance, the best Lions centre, yet you would prefer the useless Farrell, who has been living on reputation for 3-4 years?no sleep wrote:Will never know, but I do wonder how the series would have gone if he'd been fit for the start. I reckon that performance would have got Russell the starting spot and we'd have been much more likely to play the rugby we needed to.Mikey Brown wrote:Yep. Russell really turned my feelings on this whole tour around to be honest. Seeing the talent of repeatedly putting runners on to a good pass make such a difference to the side, one seemingly so desperate to not play any rugby, was nice. It wasn’t enough but that game was there to be won. The Bokkes suddenly had to consider not letting us have the ball rather than just giving it back without a care.
He wasn’t flawless but his all round game was very strong and his positives far, far outweighed the cost of the dropped high ball and pen conceded. Fantastic goal kicking too.
Not sure there was a midfield combination capable of carrying it through though - would have loved to see Russell - Farrell - Aki just for the fun of it.
-
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Lions
I was nervous every kick he had as I felt there are people (possibly Gatland included) just waiting to say he is a flake, but he was really very very good.
I'm surprised to see the dropped high ball get attention. Biggar is the best 10 in the world under a high ball and dropped 2 in his 10 minutes. There were far far more glaring mistakes by the Lions in that game.
I'm surprised to see the dropped high ball get attention. Biggar is the best 10 in the world under a high ball and dropped 2 in his 10 minutes. There were far far more glaring mistakes by the Lions in that game.
Re: Lions
I don't rate Farrell highly. I meant that that was one of the weirder midfield combinations that you could make from the squad.Spiffy wrote:Even if Russell had been fully fit, you can bet your boots that Gatland would not have started him. He does after all, think for himself. Why do you rate Farrell so highly? He was a disaster on tour and offered nothing. Even cement-head Gatland had the wit to drop him from the 23. Henshaw was by some distance, the best Lions centre, yet you would prefer the useless Farrell, who has been living on reputation for 3-4 years?no sleep wrote:Will never know, but I do wonder how the series would have gone if he'd been fit for the start. I reckon that performance would have got Russell the starting spot and we'd have been much more likely to play the rugby we needed to.Mikey Brown wrote:Yep. Russell really turned my feelings on this whole tour around to be honest. Seeing the talent of repeatedly putting runners on to a good pass make such a difference to the side, one seemingly so desperate to not play any rugby, was nice. It wasn’t enough but that game was there to be won. The Bokkes suddenly had to consider not letting us have the ball rather than just giving it back without a care.
He wasn’t flawless but his all round game was very strong and his positives far, far outweighed the cost of the dropped high ball and pen conceded. Fantastic goal kicking too.
Not sure there was a midfield combination capable of carrying it through though - would have loved to see Russell - Farrell - Aki just for the fun of it.
I don't know what midfield I'd pick. Probably have Russell, Henshaw and Dunno.
- General Zod
- Posts: 1811
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:32 pm
Re: Lions
Thank goodness that contrived nonsense is over for a few more years.
-
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yeah. The tour was idiotic from top to bottom. The media hype train was pretty unbearable, but not surprising given everyone’s desperation for a bit of a distraction. The rugby was horrific, but surely Gatland will not be in the running next time out.General Zod wrote:Thank goodness that contrived nonsense is over for a few more years.
In a sense I feel weirdly encouraged by the failure. You can’t beat grind with more grind. Rugby isn’t completely dead. SA are an anomaly that need to be out-thought and out-manoeuvred. A series win would have vindicated this tactic of countering negativity with more negativity. Refusing to play the game to such a degree that you leave the result in the hands of the blocking runners and TMOs.
The attack was obviously massively flawed. Who will ever really know what balance of Gatland and Townsend made it so, but Townsend will surely have learned some lessons. I’m excited to see how he develops on the back of this.
-
- Posts: 3161
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Yeah I kinda agree. Be very interested in the tests later this year between the other southern hemisphere sides and SA, given that those guys have had the time and space and desire to create decent attacking structures.Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah. The tour was idiotic from top to bottom. The media hype train was pretty unbearable, but not surprising given everyone’s desperation for a bit of a distraction. The rugby was horrific, but surely Gatland will not be in the running next time out.General Zod wrote:Thank goodness that contrived nonsense is over for a few more years.
In a sense I feel weirdly encouraged by the failure. You can’t beat grind with more grind. Rugby isn’t completely dead. SA are an anomaly that need to be out-thought and out-manoeuvred. A series win would have vindicated this tactic of countering negativity with more negativity. Refusing to play the game to such a degree that you leave the result in the hands of the blocking runners and TMOs.
The attack was obviously massively flawed. Who will ever really know what balance of Gatland and Townsend made it so, but Townsend will surely have learned some lessons. I’m excited to see how he develops on the back of this.
I am slightly worried that the amount of kicking we did was a tactic of Townsend's rather than Gatland, given that we've seen Scotland do a lot of kicking over the last year. Like you say hopefully GT will learn that lesson.
Sent from my CPH2195 using Tapatalk
It was so much easier to blame Them. It was bleakly depressing to think They were Us. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.
-
- Posts: 2851
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Lions
Quote from Townsend Inthe Guardian suggests he is still attack minded:
“I believe the game has already moved to an era when 10s have to be attackers,” said Townsend, praising both Russell and the fast-improving Marcus Smith whom he already considers to be “one of the best attacking 10s in the world” and a blossoming England star. “We’ve seen players like Richie Mo’unga, we’ve seen Finn last night … those are the 10s who put defences under pressure. I do believe their way of playing can win games.”
“I believe the game has already moved to an era when 10s have to be attackers,” said Townsend, praising both Russell and the fast-improving Marcus Smith whom he already considers to be “one of the best attacking 10s in the world” and a blossoming England star. “We’ve seen players like Richie Mo’unga, we’ve seen Finn last night … those are the 10s who put defences under pressure. I do believe their way of playing can win games.”
-
- Posts: 1333
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2019 9:19 am
Re: Lions
needs to be over, full stop.General Zod wrote:Thank goodness that contrived nonsense is over for a few more years.
I see already talk of
Gatland again for the next series
More games in the next series (throw in Tong and Fiji to make that "palatable"
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 2:14 pm
Re: Lions
Lack of fans really didn't help this tour
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Gatland hunting he wants another and the lions blazers wanting him back has really soured things for me. It is clear from everyone that Finn Russell was the sole reason we got to enjoy Saturday and had fuck all to do with Gatland.
- Puja
- Posts: 18176
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Lions
Same here. He is a blight on the Lions - might be a very decent coach for an international side given time to build a structure, but time and again for the Lions he's gone stodgy, staid, and been lucky to get the results he has.whatisthejava wrote:Gatland hunting he wants another and the lions blazers wanting him back has really soured things for me. It is clear from everyone that Finn Russell was the sole reason we got to enjoy Saturday and had fuck all to do with Gatland.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
I’m agreeing with you really hard but, the next tour is Australia. Let someone young come in and let them try and beat the Aussies by playing adventurous rugby so if they do well they can go into NZ ready. If Gatland gets the next one, then he either gets NZ again or your looking at an inexperienced lions head coach going to NZ.Puja wrote:Same here. He is a blight on the Lions - might be a very decent coach for an international side given time to build a structure, but time and again for the Lions he's gone stodgy, staid, and been lucky to get the results he has.whatisthejava wrote:Gatland hunting he wants another and the lions blazers wanting him back has really soured things for me. It is clear from everyone that Finn Russell was the sole reason we got to enjoy Saturday and had fuck all to do with Gatland.
Puja
It makes no damn sense and is compelling as watching paint dry
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 2:14 pm
Re: Lions
That was my first time watching Lions rugby and it was a hard watch.
All sorts of comments from South Africans online like "if you want entertainment, watch WWE".
Between the lack of rugby and the whinging, that was a very bad advert for the game globally. I doubt anyone became a fan of rugby thanks to that tour and it will certainly have turned more than a few people off of it.
All sorts of comments from South Africans online like "if you want entertainment, watch WWE".
Between the lack of rugby and the whinging, that was a very bad advert for the game globally. I doubt anyone became a fan of rugby thanks to that tour and it will certainly have turned more than a few people off of it.
-
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Lions
Pat Lam or Nick Evans for the lions head coaching job please
-
- Posts: 12349
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Kinda feel we will have 4 years of structure from England/Ireland and in 4 years time FR will be back to third choice behind Farrell and Biggar
-
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2020 2:14 pm
Re: Lions
I bought into the Lions for the first time this year and don't think I will be bothering again in 4 years time. This tour has been horrible on many fronts. Touring to a country that's currently on the brink of a civil war and rife with coronavirus in the first place was questionable at least. Then the negative anti-rugby and lack of fans to salvage an atmosphere at least. Then World Rugby failing to have an adequate contingency plan for any official being ill was ridiculous. Then the Rassie documentary was probably the lowest point for me. Just not a good tour in any way. The thing I'm least bothered about was the loss.
In 4 years time, I'm going to struggle to get back on the bandwagon
In 4 years time, I'm going to struggle to get back on the bandwagon
-
- Posts: 5576
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Lions
I expect Smith to be well clear of any England 10s by that point. If not in the eyes of EJ, certainly in the eyes of the Lions coach.whatisthejava wrote:Kinda feel we will have 4 years of structure from England/Ireland and in 4 years time FR will be back to third choice behind Farrell and Biggar
Russell will be approaching 33 for the next tour. I am not sure he will still be a top level international by that point. Ever since his serious injury I have always had a feeling he was in it for a good time not a long time. Maybe it is just his personality and I think his approach is great to be honest. Could imagine him in Japan getting paid a good whack in 4 years time. And Hastings and Thomson if they continue to get better can put pressure on him at that point even if he is still a top level 10.