Re: England v Japan
Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2022 5:32 pm
Glad to see one corner of the Pacific will give us respect after NZ and Samoa's unsporting behaviour in not rolling over.
Thirded (edit: fourthed). Achieved more in one test than Hill in however many.badback wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 5:30 pmI thought Ribbans was good tooBanquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 4:13 pmIts how Smith was used when he first came in- loops early, gets missed and then distributes. Not sure better defences would be fooled tho- first try was very soft, even if it was a great line from Steward.
Ribbans has looked the part- old school hard second row.
Coles has had two caps and been pretty decent so I’m a bit confused by your comment.Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:03 pm Much better, playing a weaker team helps. Spontaneous thoughts.
Smith isn't quite clicking.
May is still ace.
I don't know what problem 3 locks is solving. But it seems to rely on curry's insane workrate. He can do it v japan but I doubt against the best.
Simmonds' best game for England.
Coles is an unlucky player, i fear that may be a feature of his caps. E.g. the rip creates a Japanese try.
Steward is really good.
It is weird LCD is a lion. George is much better.
Jvp is aces, although some of the passes showed youngs' influence.
Haha just a feeling he will have no luckBanquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:57 pmColes has had two caps and been pretty decent so I’m a bit confused by your comment.Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:03 pm Much better, playing a weaker team helps. Spontaneous thoughts.
Smith isn't quite clicking.
May is still ace.
I don't know what problem 3 locks is solving. But it seems to rely on curry's insane workrate. He can do it v japan but I doubt against the best.
Simmonds' best game for England.
Coles is an unlucky player, i fear that may be a feature of his caps. E.g. the rip creates a Japanese try.
Steward is really good.
It is weird LCD is a lion. George is much better.
Jvp is aces, although some of the passes showed youngs' influence.
I agree with the majority of this.Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:03 pm Much better, playing a weaker team helps. Spontaneous thoughts.
Smith isn't quite clicking.
May is still ace.
I don't know what problem 3 locks is solving. But it seems to rely on curry's insane workrate. He can do it v japan but I doubt against the best.
Simmonds' best game for England.
Coles is an unlucky player, i fear that may be a feature of his caps. E.g. the rip creates a Japanese try.
Steward is really good.
It is weird LCD is a lion. George is much better.
Jvp is aces, although some of the passes showed youngs' influence.
Smith, imo, is not playing well because he’s not allowed to play his natural game. For me, you either let him play his natural game, and to boss that game, or you don’t play him. The Farrell compromise, in both senses of the words, continues…Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:11 pmI agree with the majority of this.Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:03 pm Much better, playing a weaker team helps. Spontaneous thoughts.
Smith isn't quite clicking.
May is still ace.
I don't know what problem 3 locks is solving. But it seems to rely on curry's insane workrate. He can do it v japan but I doubt against the best.
Simmonds' best game for England.
Coles is an unlucky player, i fear that may be a feature of his caps. E.g. the rip creates a Japanese try.
Steward is really good.
It is weird LCD is a lion. George is much better.
Jvp is aces, although some of the passes showed youngs' influence.
Two tries for Smith will distract from what was overall, a pretty poor performance. I can’t put my finger on why, but things he’d do almost nonchalantly for Quins aren’t coming off for him in the same way. For example, the cross field kick that led to his second try was rubbish and he was really lucky that he was bailed out by his teammates making something from it.
Similarly, Porter scoring two tries sounds good, but he was simply the beneficiary of being in the right place at the right time to finish others’ good work.
Mainly agree, but his execution was just poor a fair few times.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:44 pmSmith, imo, is not playing well because he’s not allowed to play his natural game. For me, you either let him play his natural game, and to boss that game, or you don’t play him. The Farrell compromise, in both senses of the words, continues…Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:11 pmI agree with the majority of this.Mr Mwenda wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 6:03 pm Much better, playing a weaker team helps. Spontaneous thoughts.
Smith isn't quite clicking.
May is still ace.
I don't know what problem 3 locks is solving. But it seems to rely on curry's insane workrate. He can do it v japan but I doubt against the best.
Simmonds' best game for England.
Coles is an unlucky player, i fear that may be a feature of his caps. E.g. the rip creates a Japanese try.
Steward is really good.
It is weird LCD is a lion. George is much better.
Jvp is aces, although some of the passes showed youngs' influence.
Two tries for Smith will distract from what was overall, a pretty poor performance. I can’t put my finger on why, but things he’d do almost nonchalantly for Quins aren’t coming off for him in the same way. For example, the cross field kick that led to his second try was rubbish and he was really lucky that he was bailed out by his teammates making something from it.
Similarly, Porter scoring two tries sounds good, but he was simply the beneficiary of being in the right place at the right time to finish others’ good work.
Definitely but I think that’s because he’s thinking about what Jones’s/Gleeson’s system wants him to do rather than just playing what he sees in front of him*. What ever it is, he’s currently not worthy of selection and it all goes back to picking your 10 and then sticking his round peg in a square hole.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:56 pmMainly agree, but his execution was just poor a fair few times.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:44 pmSmith, imo, is not playing well because he’s not allowed to play his natural game. For me, you either let him play his natural game, and to boss that game, or you don’t play him. The Farrell compromise, in both senses of the words, continues…Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:11 pm
I agree with the majority of this.
Two tries for Smith will distract from what was overall, a pretty poor performance. I can’t put my finger on why, but things he’d do almost nonchalantly for Quins aren’t coming off for him in the same way. For example, the cross field kick that led to his second try was rubbish and he was really lucky that he was bailed out by his teammates making something from it.
Similarly, Porter scoring two tries sounds good, but he was simply the beneficiary of being in the right place at the right time to finish others’ good work.
The coaching staff should be coaching that silly little vertical bunny hop out of Smith's game. It's predictable, gains no ground, slows him up and makes him look like a flash Harry.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 9:59 pm Sounds like I missed a much more cohesive performance than last week. Balance of Japanese NZ-hangover vs England development/bounce-back?
I saw someone said ‘please Smith stop kicking away attacking ball’. Good to see that old pattern repeat itself.
Dunno those little chips looked off the cuff but bad options badly executed, ditto intercepted pass.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:06 pmDefinitely but I think that’s because he’s thinking about what Jones’s/Gleeson’s system wants him to do rather than just playing what he sees in front of him*. What ever it is, he’s currently not worthy of selection and it all goes back to picking your 10 and then sticking his round peg in a square hole.
*the same happened to Ford, imo, so he’s not the first instinctive 10 to regress/not reach his potential under Jones.
Difficult to argue against that. It’s just a gut feeling that Smith’s natural game is being so messed with that even the basics have gone to pot. Brain fog is the best title for it, I suppose. There’s no way you look at him for Quins and for England and believe it’s the same player. Nothing to base that on other than my mercurial 10 tinted spectacles. The poor bloke’s had 15ish caps and never had a set-up even close to that which made him play his way into the England XV. As above, even a seasoned veteran such as Ford had his creativity drilled out of him and on occasion had games of endless aimless kicking, albeit he never looked as discombobulated as Smith does.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:14 pmDunno those little chips looked off the cuff but bad options badly executed, ditto intercepted pass.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Nov 12, 2022 10:06 pmDefinitely but I think that’s because he’s thinking about what Jones’s/Gleeson’s system wants him to do rather than just playing what he sees in front of him*. What ever it is, he’s currently not worthy of selection and it all goes back to picking your 10 and then sticking his round peg in a square hole.
*the same happened to Ford, imo, so he’s not the first instinctive 10 to regress/not reach his potential under Jones.
I think with Ford he may not have been doing what he necessarily wanted to do, but he generally executed what he was asked to do, well.
Agreed on Ford but I’m very biased.