The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.co.uk/
So did I and Ludlam didn’t look fat to me and I was rather impressed with his pace as I have been in 6 Nations
Now we know why Walker has been retained. LCD being crocked really does limit our options.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 11:43 am Hooker is a major problem for us now. George really needs to be wrapped in cotton wool as no-one else we have seems to be up to standard. I know there has been a fair bit of excitement around Theo Dan, but he really shat the bed on his debut and Blamire wasn’t much better.
Did you see the game? I reckon he's put on at least a stone since the start of last season. He played ok, but looks very top heavy.
I would agree. There's no way in hell I'm going back to do a minute-by-minute, but I suspect if I did, there would be a lot of promise found in the opening thirty minutes, that we've mostly forgotten about because it was overridden in our brains by the abjectness of the next 50. We opened them up very nicely on a few occasions and there were some definite structure there. It all got buried in the competition of "Let's see how many times we can make basic handling errors" that we took up second half, but there was *something* there.FKAS wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:49 amWe had a lot more attacking shape than we've seen in the last year. Two runners for the 9 to pick from and one in behind to link with the backs or act as support with our pods of 3. Smith got the ball in space with room to attack on several occasions.16th man wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:29 am Already feels like it was just a bad dream.
Hopefully next Saturday will see a team closer to first choice, with some familiarity, and actual basic skills on display. Don't want to get too carried away and ask for a cogent game plan that goes beyond hoof it in the air for the big lads to chase
It's not coherent enough yet but a step forward. Wales actually kicked the ball a lot more than we did.
Error count was just way to high. Can't turnover the ball 23 times in a test match, that's just ridiculous.
Imagine being Tommy Freeman yesterday watching Coka put in that performance.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
I did say he played ok. But he's still top heavy.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
He's so far proving the meh-sayers amongst us correct.p/d wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:16 pm Our coaching staff made Edwards look a barrel of laughs.
Their demeanour for the whole game mirrored the tosh that was playing out in front of them. Players looked in poor shape, lethargic and, at times, confused. Not sure how many times Genge has captained but can’t imagine there is a tick in the win column. Care, Porter, Coka and Malins shouldn’t have even been named let alone coming out for the second half. Smith’s inability to remove phlegm from his mouth was his highlight whilst Steward and Marchant get a pass.
Pack incredibly disjointed and, as such, pretty ineffective
Come on SB prove us ‘out with Jones’ desk thumpers right!!!
Well given he was the only back who made any kind of break in the entire game, I think you’re being harsh. Perhaps he could have made more of the opportunity, but it’s not like it was a walk-in and I don’t agree ‘any decent international centre ought to have scored’.
Thing is, whilst judging that game in isolation is a bit daft given the number of brand new combos.... it is what his mob fielded is the big issue for me, no gains to be had objectively.
Plus pretty much any winger in the Prem…Beasties wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:25 pmImagine being Tommy Freeman yesterday watching Coka put in that performance.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
I'm not a great fan of Malins, but at least he shows some rugby intelligence, whereas Coka is just a big lump with little between the ears. Neither should be there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:03 pmI did say he played ok. But he's still top heavy.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
Freeman is the one who should be most dischuffed. Malins has been pants for ages.
The most notable moment of the game was watching Coka run an inside line and get stopped on the gainline, then watching Marchant run the same move a couple of minutes later and making a half-break. I was willing to give Coka a chance on the basis that being fit again and having a full training camp might've got the best out of him. That chance has been given, he's not international quality right now, let's move the hell on.Spiffy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:15 pmI'm not a great fan of Malins, but at least he shows some rugby intelligence, whereas Coka is just a big lump with little between the ears. Neither should be there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:03 pmI did say he played ok. But he's still top heavy.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
Freeman is the one who should be most dischuffed. Malins has been pants for ages.
There was a lot of one out runners and paucity of options and slow as shit ball. There were also some decent and some very basic balls pulled back. Although we had the better of the first half it was miles of being cohesive or even really challenging. The odd nice play aside a lot was pretty telegraphed and at times yoy could see forwards not knowing where they should be / reading the play in front of them.Puja wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:20 pmI would agree. There's no way in hell I'm going back to do a minute-by-minute, but I suspect if I did, there would be a lot of promise found in the opening thirty minutes, that we've mostly forgotten about because it was overridden in our brains by the abjectness of the next 50. We opened them up very nicely on a few occasions and there were some definite structure there. It all got buried in the competition of "Let's see how many times we can make basic handling errors" that we took up second half, but there was *something* there.FKAS wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:49 amWe had a lot more attacking shape than we've seen in the last year. Two runners for the 9 to pick from and one in behind to link with the backs or act as support with our pods of 3. Smith got the ball in space with room to attack on several occasions.16th man wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:29 am Already feels like it was just a bad dream.
Hopefully next Saturday will see a team closer to first choice, with some familiarity, and actual basic skills on display. Don't want to get too carried away and ask for a cogent game plan that goes beyond hoof it in the air for the big lads to chase
It's not coherent enough yet but a step forward. Wales actually kicked the ball a lot more than we did.
Error count was just way to high. Can't turnover the ball 23 times in a test match, that's just ridiculous.
Puja
...does he? He looks mildly panicky mostly.Spiffy wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 3:15 pmbut at least he shows some rugby intelligence, whereas Coka is just a big lump with little between the ears. Neither should be there.Banquo wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 2:03 pmI did say he played ok. But he's still top heavy.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 12:39 pm Timber or otherwise, Ludlam was one of the few players who wasn’t rubbish. That break was a bit more reminiscent of what we see in a Saints jersey and I think he’s probably cemented his place in the squad.
Seeing Coka and Malins play poorly makes it all the more annoying that Murley didn’t get a shot.
Freeman is the one who should be most dischuffed. Malins has been pants for ages.
I thought it was telling that one of the highlights (from commentary) was a moment where the telepathic club comrades Care and Dombrandt got their timing wrong, with Care’s pass going behind Dombrandt, forcing him to throw an improved pass out the back to Smith which opened up a bit of space.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 4:15 pmThere was a lot of one out runners and paucity of options and slow as shit ball. There were also some decent and some very basic balls pulled back. Although we had the better of the first half it was miles of being cohesive or even really challenging. The odd nice play aside a lot was pretty telegraphed and at times yoy could see forwards not knowing where they should be / reading the play in front of them.Puja wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 1:20 pmI would agree. There's no way in hell I'm going back to do a minute-by-minute, but I suspect if I did, there would be a lot of promise found in the opening thirty minutes, that we've mostly forgotten about because it was overridden in our brains by the abjectness of the next 50. We opened them up very nicely on a few occasions and there were some definite structure there. It all got buried in the competition of "Let's see how many times we can make basic handling errors" that we took up second half, but there was *something* there.FKAS wrote: ↑Sun Aug 06, 2023 10:49 am
We had a lot more attacking shape than we've seen in the last year. Two runners for the 9 to pick from and one in behind to link with the backs or act as support with our pods of 3. Smith got the ball in space with room to attack on several occasions.
It's not coherent enough yet but a step forward. Wales actually kicked the ball a lot more than we did.
Error count was just way to high. Can't turnover the ball 23 times in a test match, that's just ridiculous.
Puja