SA Side to Join PRO12

Moderator: Sandydragon

Mikey Brown
Posts: 11995
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Mikey Brown »

Numbers wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:So, literally just inheriting all the problems of the super touch league (credit to whoever said that originally) along with their discarded teams?

Not really, that would leave us with 2 more teams so 14, same as the French, quite acheivable.
Yeah I thought that might not have been that clear. I was more referring to the suggestion of the conference system, which seems to be horribly confusing and unsatisfactory from what little attention I've paid to their league.

I just wanted to use the phrase super touch, to be honest.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Ross. S wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Ross. S wrote:
??? Surely if the club season were to be reduced from 30 or so club games (22 league, 6 euro plus playoffs with both etc) to 16-20 the superstars would be able to play in most if not all games. Is that difficult to understand?

Personally I'd like to scrap all current competitions and replace with 1 europe wide, 40 team strong (take the NFL model, 2 conferences split into 4 pools of 5) competition playing 18-20 high quality max intensity games with a SF-F-superbowl-esq cross conference finale. But it'd never happen.
You said that you would like to see fewer games of a higher standard and then in the next sentence you said that you would like to see superstars week in week out, so if there are fewer games how would this be acheivable is my point.

I think a Eruopean league is just farcical tbh and I wouldn't be in support of a two tier system either.
Top players play what, 15-20 games a season? so in a 30 game season they're missing quite often. Reduce the season to <20 games and the top players can play every week without risking burn-out. Top players, playing every game would increase the quality, no? Increased quality and star power would (shoud?) increase fan turn out which should cover loss of revenue from less games.
What you seem to be overlooking is that if you reduce the amount of games they won't be playing every week...
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Mikey Brown wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:So, literally just inheriting all the problems of the super touch league (credit to whoever said that originally) along with their discarded teams?

Not really, that would leave us with 2 more teams so 14, same as the French, quite acheivable.
Yeah I thought that might not have been that clear. I was more referring to the suggestion of the conference system, which seems to be horribly confusing and unsatisfactory from what little attention I've paid to their league.

I just wanted to use the phrase super touch, to be honest.
Haha, fair play.
Ross. S
Posts: 401
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:59 pm
Location: Rhondda

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Ross. S »

Numbers wrote:
Ross. S wrote:
Numbers wrote:
You said that you would like to see fewer games of a higher standard and then in the next sentence you said that you would like to see superstars week in week out, so if there are fewer games how would this be acheivable is my point.

I think a Eruopean league is just farcical tbh and I wouldn't be in support of a two tier system either.
Top players play what, 15-20 games a season? so in a 30 game season they're missing quite often. Reduce the season to <20 games and the top players can play every week without risking burn-out. Top players, playing every game would increase the quality, no? Increased quality and star power would (shoud?) increase fan turn out which should cover loss of revenue from less games.
What you seem to be overlooking is that if you reduce the amount of games they won't be playing every week...
Are you trying to be hard work? Reduce the season to 20 weeks, a player can play 20 games a season so how is that not every week? Or do you only accept every week as playing 52+ times a year?
Doorzetbornandbred
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Doorzetbornandbred »

Ross. S wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Ross. S wrote:
Top players play what, 15-20 games a season? so in a 30 game season they're missing quite often. Reduce the season to <20 games and the top players can play every week without risking burn-out. Top players, playing every game would increase the quality, no? Increased quality and star power would (shoud?) increase fan turn out which should cover loss of revenue from less games.
What you seem to be overlooking is that if you reduce the amount of games they won't be playing every week...
Are you trying to be hard work? Reduce the season to 20 weeks, a player can play 20 games a season so how is that not every week? Or do you only accept every week as playing 52+ times a year?
The season is 35 weeks+ long, so they would be playing not far off every other week.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Sandydragon »

I think the point is that we either have more club games, and accept that the top international players cannot play in every one, or have less club games but with international players more likely to play.

More games might mean more cash for the clubs, but will supporters continue to pay to watch sub-standard games.

What is for certain is that the current season is a joke. International windows that crop up just before big european games, which by themselves are split across the season. I'd rather move all international games to the end of the season and work out how to keep the home and away international 'friendlies' in and around a six nations that is later in the season.

It is very difficult though to make a case for less club rugby when the 2 league that are most financially viable are those which play the most rugby, although are they financially viable as proper business entities or just because they have benefactors pouring money in?
User avatar
ALunpg
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Wihan Daeng

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by ALunpg »

Whilst we have European competitions which lets be honest brings in revenue if you get success (eg the Irish sides :D ) then the top players are commited to playing at least 4 European games plus 9 internationals plus a week before and a week in between for the 6 nations thats 13 matches over a 15 week period and that's before they even play a Pro 12 match .
Adding to that national summer and Lions tours plus world cups it becomes even less likely that they play Pro 12. So whilst the idea of limiting is good the practicality is that they would still not play many region matches.

My thought is that whilst the leading players add to the spectacle, the fact they are away gives an opportunity to other players to develop.From a personal perspective I would go to a match to support a team irrespective of whether AWJ or Warburton or JD2 is playing or not .
Ex prop Ex coach still a Welshman and enjoying retirement
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Sandydragon »

ALunpg wrote:Whilst we have European competitions which lets be honest brings in revenue if you get success (eg the Irish sides :D ) then the top players are commited to playing at least 4 European games plus 9 internationals plus a week before and a week in between for the 6 nations thats 13 matches over a 15 week period and that's before they even play a Pro 12 match .
Adding to that national summer and Lions tours plus world cups it becomes even less likely that they play Pro 12. So whilst the idea of limiting is good the practicality is that they would still not play many region matches.

My thought is that whilst the leading players add to the spectacle, the fact they are away gives an opportunity to other players to develop.From a personal perspective I would go to a match to support a team irrespective of whether AWJ or Warburton or JD2 is playing or not .
I'd agree. I think the issue is not one of resting players, but of weakened teams getting stuffed. Is the solution less games so the top players can take part or more money for larger squads that have sufficient depth to manage player rotation and international duties?
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Ross. S wrote:
Numbers wrote:
Ross. S wrote:
Top players play what, 15-20 games a season? so in a 30 game season they're missing quite often. Reduce the season to <20 games and the top players can play every week without risking burn-out. Top players, playing every game would increase the quality, no? Increased quality and star power would (shoud?) increase fan turn out which should cover loss of revenue from less games.
What you seem to be overlooking is that if you reduce the amount of games they won't be playing every week...
Are you trying to be hard work? Reduce the season to 20 weeks, a player can play 20 games a season so how is that not every week? Or do you only accept every week as playing 52+ times a year?
Buy a calculator Ross.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Sandydragon wrote:I think the point is that we either have more club games, and accept that the top international players cannot play in every one, or have less club games but with international players more likely to play.

More games might mean more cash for the clubs, but will supporters continue to pay to watch sub-standard games.

What is for certain is that the current season is a joke. International windows that crop up just before big european games, which by themselves are split across the season. I'd rather move all international games to the end of the season and work out how to keep the home and away international 'friendlies' in and around a six nations that is later in the season.

It is very difficult though to make a case for less club rugby when the 2 league that are most financially viable are those which play the most rugby, although are they financially viable as proper business entities or just because they have benefactors pouring money in?

How would that develop any players?

Not likely to happen.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Sandydragon »

It wouldnt develop any players and there wouldnt be enough income, so I agree it won't happen, especially not since the tier below the regions is just not good enough to provide that required development at that level.

Frankly, the only solution is to accept that there will be star players missing a lot during Pro12 games and teams that have ambitions in the European cups will target those.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Sandydragon wrote:It wouldnt develop any players and there wouldnt be enough income, so I agree it won't happen, especially not since the tier below the regions is just not good enough to provide that required development at that level.

Frankly, the only solution is to accept that there will be star players missing a lot during Pro12 games and teams that have ambitions in the European cups will target those.
Indeed, as we are, they should still be able to pick the star players for the bigger league games.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Sandydragon »

Numbers wrote:
Sandydragon wrote:It wouldnt develop any players and there wouldnt be enough income, so I agree it won't happen, especially not since the tier below the regions is just not good enough to provide that required development at that level.

Frankly, the only solution is to accept that there will be star players missing a lot during Pro12 games and teams that have ambitions in the European cups will target those.
Indeed, as we are, they should still be able to pick the star players for the bigger league games.
Although many of our sides then tend to lose against opposition they are expected to do well against!

Bottom line is we need more money and if this SA deal can bring more in then fantastic, although I will be a but gutted to see the end of the derby days.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11995
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Mikey Brown »

Have there been any ideas floated yet about the Euro qualification conundrum?
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Mikey Brown wrote:Have there been any ideas floated yet about the Euro qualification conundrum?
I haven't seen anything and as the deal is with the PRO12 there is no obligation for the SA teams to be in the Champions Cup or Challenge Cup competitions which have different governing bodies, I would assume it will stay the same but with the position of the SA teams discounted.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 11995
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yeah I had presumed they wouldn't even be in the debate for participating, but it seems curious how a team from South Africa can (in part) dictate the teams who take part in the European cup. No other way to do it I suppose, it just doesn't sound right to me.
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2480
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Numbers »

Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I had presumed they wouldn't even be in the debate for participating, but it seems curious how a team from South Africa can (in part) dictate the teams who take part in the European cup. No other way to do it I suppose, it just doesn't sound right to me.
I see what you mean, the SA teams will be much more likely to field similar strength teams week on week (no 6 nations, no AIs), so at least all the usual teams should be playing the same standard of team, the tricky bit being if you have to face one of those teams during the international window when they will be a lot stronger relatively than the PRO12 teams.
Lord Lucan
Posts: 213
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2017 5:35 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Lord Lucan »

Numbers wrote:
Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I had presumed they wouldn't even be in the debate for participating, but it seems curious how a team from South Africa can (in part) dictate the teams who take part in the European cup. No other way to do it I suppose, it just doesn't sound right to me.
I see what you mean, the SA teams will be much more likely to field similar strength teams week on week (no 6 nations, no AIs), so at least all the usual teams should be playing the same standard of team, the tricky bit being if you have to face one of those teams during the international window when they will be a lot stronger relatively than the PRO12 teams.
South Africa play in the Autumn internationals, so it would affect these teams if they have any Springboks playing for them.
User avatar
ALunpg
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Wihan Daeng

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by ALunpg »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40583145

Looks more likely... playing 6 teams twice and 7 against the other teams so that's 19 matches against 22 at the moment . These are the weaker sides in SA and they do not have many Internationals plus their players will be rested during European competitions of at least 6 matches.

Whilst I am always exited about a new challenge I still have many reservations about travel and ensuring a level playing field.
What would be interesting is the attendance when these teams play.
Ex prop Ex coach still a Welshman and enjoying retirement
User avatar
Sandydragon
Posts: 10466
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Sandydragon »

ALunpg wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-union/40583145

Looks more likely... playing 6 teams twice and 7 against the other teams so that's 19 matches against 22 at the moment . These are the weaker sides in SA and they do not have many Internationals plus their players will be rested during European competitions of at least 6 matches.

Whilst I am always exited about a new challenge I still have many reservations about travel and ensuring a level playing field.
What would be interesting is the attendance when these teams play
.
Yup. I'm not against giving this a shot and it might be the financial improvement the Pro12 needs. It will need time to bed in, but I hope that the increase in revenues will offset the loss of the derby matches which are guaranteed sellouts (or very good attendance) for the regions.
zer0
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:11 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by zer0 »

ALunpg wrote:Whilst I am always exited about a new challenge I still have many reservations about travel and ensuring a level playing field.
What would be interesting is the attendance when these teams play.
I'm also interested to see how things go. Given that it'll be South Africa's summer, Bloemfontein's average January high of 31 degrees means they'll probably be playing in the evening/night. The Saffers have enjoyed a SR TV schedule that's been tailored to suit them for decades, so it'll be interesting to see how they react if/when the shoe is on the other foot.
User avatar
ALunpg
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Wihan Daeng

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by ALunpg »

zer0 wrote:
ALunpg wrote:Whilst I am always exited about a new challenge I still have many reservations about travel and ensuring a level playing field.
What would be interesting is the attendance when these teams play.
I'm also interested to see how things go. Given that it'll be South Africa's summer, Bloemfontein's average January high of 31 degrees means they'll probably be playing in the evening/night. The Saffers have enjoyed a SR TV schedule that's been tailored to suit them for decades, so it'll be interesting to see how they react if/when the shoe is on the other foot.
Damn ..I will book me hols ..hopefully we get to play there in December .. :D
Ex prop Ex coach still a Welshman and enjoying retirement
User avatar
Tre
Posts: 341
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Tre »

Guiness Atlantic Rugby League... Medium tearm Plan is for a US team to join in a couple of years and then a german team in 2-4 years. Guiness currently pay £1M a year, and this could go up to £10M with the inclusion of SA and US teams.

I've also seen it mooted that you only play your conference so the ST I bought in May could have gone from11 home league games, 3 Euro games and however many LV/BIC/Cardiff RFC games will be 6 home league games - none of which against Dragons or Scarlets although the WRU assured the JSG that the number of derbies would remain the same.

Not sure about Euro qualification but believe the plan is for the SA teams to be eligible to qualify.

It also costs nearly £2k to fly to Bloemfontein from London!

Guiness Atlantic Rugby League
User avatar
ALunpg
Posts: 516
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:48 pm
Location: Wihan Daeng

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by ALunpg »

Tre wrote:Guiness Atlantic Rugby League... Medium tearm Plan is for a US team to join in a couple of years and then a german team in 2-4 years. Guiness currently pay £1M a year, and this could go up to £10M with the inclusion of SA and US teams.

I've also seen it mooted that you only play your conference so the ST I bought in May could have gone from11 home league games, 3 Euro games and however many LV/BIC/Cardiff RFC games will be 6 home league games - none of which against Dragons or Scarlets although the WRU assured the JSG that the number of derbies would remain the same.

Not sure about Euro qualification but believe the plan is for the SA teams to be eligible to qualify.

It also costs nearly £2k to fly to Bloemfontein from London!

Guiness Atlantic Rugby League
Guinness ...Atlantic League is ok in principal but not really sure about the Saffers or the Americans in the European Cup etc. ...travel costs for teams would be horrendous .
It may come in the future but not sure if there would be agreement from others this season.
My worry is financial pressure on teams unless they stump up more money for the teams.
Ex prop Ex coach still a Welshman and enjoying retirement
Scrumhead
Posts: 5919
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: SA Side to Join PRO12

Post by Scrumhead »

Same here - lots of holes in it ATM.

Suggesting a USA team and a German team join, what's to say they'd be any better than the Italians?

Also 16 teams is way too many. Does that then lead to some kind of two conference set-up?
Post Reply