Page 2 of 4

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 5:06 pm
by morepork
So what?

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 10:57 pm
by Zhivago

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:49 am
by onlynameleft
The Press are reporting that Zizzi is an Italian restaurant. Typical lazy journalism.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2018 8:08 am
by cashead
onlynameleft wrote:The Press are reporting that Zizzi is an Italian restaurant. Typical lazy journalism.
Oh god, you have no idea what you've just done.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2018 11:08 pm
by Digby
No shame from Russia, not even a little

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:32 am
by Mellsblue
When you’ve annexed Crimea, part invaded Ukraine and shot down a passenger plane, poisoning a handful of people in Salisbury probably seems like a joke.

Before any whatabouters come on and wibble on about Saudi dropping UK made bombs on civilians.....I don’t condone that, either

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 6:45 am
by SerjeantWildgoose
I have said it before on this very thread - and I shall say it again - Woodhenge is the most significant archeological site in the area. It simply beggars belief that anyone would make their way all the way from Russia to the UK for a long weekend in March taking two day-trips out to Salisbury for the purposes of visiting Stonehenge, Old Sarum and the Cathedral without putting Woodhenge on their itinerary.

Russia is making a mockery of the tourism attractions of Wiltshire and the West.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 9:19 am
by Zhivago
So I watched the whole thing on RT...

They just come across so damn guilty, but as spies? Hard to judge. Some aspects of their story make me wonder if they are a gay couple. They are defensive about certain details.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 10:04 am
by BBD
SerjeantWildgoose wrote:I have said it before on this very thread - and I shall say it again - Woodhenge is the most significant archeological site in the area. It simply beggars belief that anyone would make their way all the way from Russia to the UK for a long weekend in March taking two day-trips out to Salisbury for the purposes of visiting Stonehenge, Old Sarum and the Cathedral without putting Woodhenge on their itinerary.

Russia is making a mockery of the tourism attractions of Wiltshire and the West.
I suppose it would be too much to expect an afternoon taking in the delights of Wookey hole or Cheddar Gorge ffs

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 1:04 pm
by Digby
Zhivago wrote:So I watched the whole thing on RT...

They just come across so damn guilty, but as spies? Hard to judge. Some aspects of their story make me wonder if they are a gay couple. They are defensive about certain details.
Who cares if they're gay? Or is that the Kevin Spacey defence again, that they may have acted miles beyond acceptable norms but don't hold it against them because of their sexuality

As claims go it has less foundation than Salisbury Cathedral

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 4:18 pm
by Donny osmond
Pmsl jesus this says it feckin all...Image

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 8:57 pm
by Zhivago
Digby wrote:
Zhivago wrote:So I watched the whole thing on RT...

They just come across so damn guilty, but as spies? Hard to judge. Some aspects of their story make me wonder if they are a gay couple. They are defensive about certain details.
Who cares if they're gay? Or is that the Kevin Spacey defence again, that they may have acted miles beyond acceptable norms but don't hold it against them because of their sexuality

As claims go it has less foundation than Salisbury Cathedral
Anyway the verdict from my wife and her sister both Ukrainian is that they are clearly both idiots. They didn't think they were gay actually, thought the one was an alcoholic... Most probable conclusion being that they were set up to do this thing, or that they are purposefully a distraction while the real killers slipped through the net.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2018 9:53 pm
by Mellsblue
Case closed.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 12:27 am
by WaspInWales
I was a little suspicious about the news as it broke, hence the thread and its general distrust of the information that was delivered to us. However, after seeing those clowns on RT, and the way Russia have reacted to the evidence against said clowns, I'm in no doubt about Russian involvement.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:19 am
by Digby
I'd certainly agree they were set up to do this, in the sense they were issued false identities, novichok and orders to carry out an assassination. It seems improbable in the extreme the inclination and resources came from the two men identified

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:31 am
by Sandydragon
WaspInWales wrote:I was a little suspicious about the news as it broke, hence the thread and its general distrust of the information that was delivered to us. However, after seeing those clowns on RT, and the way Russia have reacted to the evidence against said clowns, I'm in no doubt about Russian involvement.
Indeed. The sequential numbering of the passports is very odd as well.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2018 4:43 pm
by Digby
Sandydragon wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:I was a little suspicious about the news as it broke, hence the thread and its general distrust of the information that was delivered to us. However, after seeing those clowns on RT, and the way Russia have reacted to the evidence against said clowns, I'm in no doubt about Russian involvement.
Indeed. The sequential numbering of the passports is very odd as well.
I'd accept maybe two friends going abroad for the first time going to the passport office together and getting sequentially numbered passports, but leaving Russia for the first time and deciding to visit Salisbury from anywhere in the world is beyond weird, choosing not to look around London is beyond beggaring belief, and finding oneself on the opposite side of Salisbury if leaving the train station to visit the Cathedral outside the Skripals house is almost starting to look suspicious

If they hadn't put four people in hospital and killed another it'd probably be something to laugh at, it's still actually somewhat funny whilst being tempered by being so sickening

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:16 am
by Which Tyler
Image

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 2:59 pm
by Digby
Just a stunning revelation that the innocent Russian tourists have careers in the military under different names, not even Cassandra saw that one coming

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:13 pm
by rowan
They have mandatory conscription in Russia. Doh! :idea:

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:34 pm
by Puja
rowan wrote:They have mandatory conscription in Russia. Doh! :idea:
And mandatory promotion to Colonel and mandatory times in special forces and mandatory medal ceremonies and receptions with Putin?

Puja

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:38 pm
by rowan
Congratulations on identifying a couple of gay steroid dealers who changed their names because their business was obviously not legal :lol:

Oh, but they served in the military - in a country where that's actually required :roll:

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 3:55 pm
by Digby
Puja wrote:
rowan wrote:They have mandatory conscription in Russia. Doh! :idea:
And mandatory promotion to Colonel and mandatory times in special forces and mandatory medal ceremonies and receptions with Putin?

Puja
I wouldn't bother, the investigative team behind the latest have previously shown Assad being behind attacks on his own people or the Russians being responsible for shooting down a civilian plane. Consequently the window lickers who've quadrupled down on supporting Russia and Syria even when they're demonstrably in the wrong are highly unlikely to post with any sense of basic common decency now

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:04 pm
by rowan
International inspectors disproved claims of chemical weapons being used in Douma. Nobody knows who shot down the plane over Ukraine.

As a neutral I'd be more inclined to believe the Syrians and Russians than the Americans and British, for example, given the latter two countries lied through their teeth before invading Iraq with no legal authority, leading to the deaths of at least a million people and quite possibly twice that many. & that's just the tip of the iceberg, of course.

Image
While the U.S. Department of Defense maintains that its massive biological research programs are meant to counter and defend against new biological weapons being developed, they are in fact developing bio-weapons in the process.

Full story here: https://www.mintpressnews.com/us-war-crimes/249716/

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2018 4:33 pm
by Digby
rowan wrote: As a neutral
Would you per chance have any bridges for sale?