RugbyRebels

The herringbone floor effect is quite tasteful but agreed it isn't one that will live long in the memory unless Quins win some silverware in it.

https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001

Traditional logo in the background is slick.

FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001

Traditional logo in the background is slick.

*That's* our away shirt? Oh man, that's a great shirt! I thought we were going to get far worse!

Puja

Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:15 pm

FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001

Traditional logo in the background is slick.

*That's* our away shirt? Oh man, that's a great shirt! I thought we were going to get far worse!

Puja

Somebody really made an effort this year. Normally I'd have thought we'd have been lucky to get one of those shirts in a season.

Nice to see the women's team will be getting the same match day shirts as well.

FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001

Traditional logo in the background is slick.

Way, WAY nicer than the home shirt horror

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:55 pm

FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001

Traditional logo in the background is slick.

Way, WAY nicer than the home shirt horror

Agreed. I think this and Quins’ home jersey are very good.

Fiji, Portugal, Argentina and Italy leading the way kitwise this world cup!

Umbro in nice, if a bit training shirty, jersey shock.

The away shirt's nice. The home shirt is firmly in the category of "I guess it could be worse". It's got nothing bad about it, but also nothing much better than getting a white shirt from Tesco and applying a rose transfer to it.

Puja

England playing in white, with a little detailing in white is absolutely fine by me (I don't even mind some red or blue patterning under the armpit - ALA Fiji).
But it does mean you need a bit harder to make it look like it's not a £1 white t-shirt from poundland

There does seem to be some detailing around the sternum… which is apposite.

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 9:33 am England playing in white, with a little detailing in white is absolutely fine by me (I don't even mind some red or blue patterning under the armpit - ALA Fiji).
But it does mean you need a bit harder to make it look like it's not a £1 white t-shirt from poundland

RWC kids shirts £95 for the authentic, £70 for 'replica'. mens £125 to £85, womens £85 to £80. weird.

I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?

Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?

Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.

The O2 is hideous tho.

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?

Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.

Third season in a row that the woman have the better kit. It must be performance related design.

Banquo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:45 pmThe O2 is hideous tho.

Well, yes - but not exactly news

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 4:22 pm

Banquo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:45 pmThe O2 is hideous tho.

Well, yes - but not exactly news

no, but it offsets the lovely insets under the arms. Look at me, Coco Chanel.

Mellsblue wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 4:05 pm

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?

Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.

Third season in a row that the woman have the better kit. It must be performance related design.

Same for the change strip.

Love this, for all the reasons stated above for England's women, and for Fiji



But I'll pass on this (take out the big plus sign, and the yellow around the collar, and I'd be far more tempted)

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:44 am Love this, for all the reasons stated above for England's women, and for Fiji



But I'll pass on this (take out the big plus sign, and the yellow around the collar, and I'd be far more tempted)

Those both look rather JB Sports unofficial range to me. Like the England men's home kit they've taken retro a bit to far and now look a bit cheap.

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:44 am Love this, for all the reasons stated above for England's women, and for Fiji



But I'll pass on this (take out the big plus sign, and the yellow around the collar, and I'd be far more tempted)

The plus sign on the change strip is surely the Cross of St George to remind them who their superiors are.

I... quite like that actually.
As ever, the advertising is too large, but that's just the modern world.
Beyond that, there's only so much you can do with hoops, and fortunately, we've had a fair few goes at proper, traditional (boring?) hoops over the last decade.

Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:58 am

I... quite like that actually.
As ever, the advertising is too large, but that's just the modern world.
Beyond that, there's only so much you can do with hoops, and fortunately, we've had a fair few goes at proper, traditional (boring?) hoops over the last decade.

I don't think the sponsorship would look so glaringly big if the badge didn't appear to be so small.

The hoops design actually looks pretty nice it's just a bit odd the way they've sized the various logos on there.

Even then, is the Bath logo small? or is it that the outer ring of blue is the same shade as the background hoop of blue, making it looks smaller than it is.

Either way, for me personally, the advertising is more prominent than I like; but I fully accept that that's a commercial reality, and Dyson aren't paying to have a tiny patch that doesn't catch the eye