Re: Kits for the 2023/24 season
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2023 5:54 pm
The herringbone floor effect is quite tasteful but agreed it isn't one that will live long in the memory unless Quins win some silverware in it.
*That's* our away shirt? Oh man, that's a great shirt! I thought we were going to get far worse!FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001
Traditional logo in the background is slick.
Somebody really made an effort this year. Normally I'd have thought we'd have been lucky to get one of those shirts in a season.Puja wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:15 pm*That's* our away shirt? Oh man, that's a great shirt! I thought we were going to get far worse!FKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001
Traditional logo in the background is slick.
Puja
Way, WAY nicer than the home shirt horrorFKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001
Traditional logo in the background is slick.
Agreed. I think this and Quins’ home jersey are very good.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 1:55 pmWay, WAY nicer than the home shirt horrorFKAS wrote: ↑Fri Jul 14, 2023 12:12 pm https://shop.leicestertigers.com/tigers/2324201000001
Traditional logo in the background is slick.
RWC kids shirts £95 for the authentic, £70 for 'replica'. mens £125 to £85, womens £85 to £80. weird.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 9:33 am England playing in white, with a little detailing in white is absolutely fine by me (I don't even mind some red or blue patterning under the armpit - ALA Fiji).
But it does mean you need a bit harder to make it look like it's not a £1 white t-shirt from poundland
The O2 is hideous tho.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?
Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.
Third season in a row that the woman have the better kit. It must be performance related design.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?
Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.
no, but it offsets the lovely insets under the arms. Look at me, Coco Chanel.
Same for the change strip.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 4:05 pmThird season in a row that the woman have the better kit. It must be performance related design.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Jul 18, 2023 3:42 pm I'm still not a fan of the collar, but how much better is the women's shirt?
Tiny detail in the collar, a bit of detailing in the under-arm panel; and suddenly, I can't achieve an identical result with a £5 t-shirt, a £1 sheet of iron-on transfer and 1 minute on google images to get the logos.
Those both look rather JB Sports unofficial range to me. Like the England men's home kit they've taken retro a bit to far and now look a bit cheap.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:44 am Love this, for all the reasons stated above for England's women, and for Fiji
But I'll pass on this (take out the big plus sign, and the yellow around the collar, and I'd be far more tempted)
![]()
The plus sign on the change strip is surely the Cross of St George to remind them who their superiors are.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 9:44 am Love this, for all the reasons stated above for England's women, and for Fiji
But I'll pass on this (take out the big plus sign, and the yellow around the collar, and I'd be far more tempted)
![]()
I don't think the sponsorship would look so glaringly big if the badge didn't appear to be so small.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Thu Jul 20, 2023 10:58 am
I... quite like that actually.
As ever, the advertising is too large, but that's just the modern world.
Beyond that, there's only so much you can do with hoops, and fortunately, we've had a fair few goes at proper, traditional (boring?) hoops over the last decade.