Do you genuinely think they're are no costs to starting a brand new team?OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
£61 million ? Come on . . . . .
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
Nearly a nice swerve after falling on yer puss after trying to look smart.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Do you genuinely think they're are no costs to starting a brand new team?OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
Ok then you win. Hurrah for you!! Go Jock!!OptimisticJock wrote:Nearly a nice swerve after falling on yer puss after trying to look smart.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Do you genuinely think they're are no costs to starting a brand new team?OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
I wasn't being entirely serious. I'd have thought the punctuation would have made that clear. However pro rugby is a good way of burning through cash.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
No, but would you be starting with some big capital spends on a stadium, gym/training centre? That'd quickly burn a lot of extra cash.OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
Aberdeen have already stated they're open to sharing their new facilities, there's mcdiarmid park and Stirling uni too.Digby wrote:No, but would you be starting with some big capital spends on a stadium, gym/training centre? That'd quickly burn a lot of extra cash.OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
-
- Posts: 2257
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:20 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
Aye mate.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Ok then you win. Hurrah for you!! Go Jock!!OptimisticJock wrote:Nearly a nice swerve after falling on yer puss after trying to look smart.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: Do you genuinely think they're are no costs to starting a brand new team?
I wasn't being entirely serious. I'd have thought the punctuation would have made that clear. However pro rugby is a good way of burning through cash.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
The only way of ensuring financial viability is to own your own facilities. Locking yourself into being a tenant is a sure way of making a rugby club a money pit unless you can get a great deal and huge crowds like Leinster.OptimisticJock wrote:Aberdeen have already stated they're open to sharing their new facilities, there's mcdiarmid park and Stirling uni too.Digby wrote:No, but would you be starting with some big capital spends on a stadium, gym/training centre? That'd quickly burn a lot of extra cash.OptimisticJock wrote:Do you genuinely think pro12 teams are losing 10 million a year?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: £61 million ? Come on . . . . .
wow.....Whiskey, Webley, trigger.WaspInWales wrote:I'd buy Greece, then retire there.
investments can go up as well as down.