Snap General Election called - The new UK Politics thread

User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 3:08 pm
Puja wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 1:33 pm
Stom wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 7:38 amWe’re not going to get a green pm. Bit if someone with a bit of charisma set up a new party and positioned themselves correctly, and gained just £1m in funding… they could do something.
I don't know we'll get a Green PM next election, but I think Polanski's really got something about him and, if Labour continue to shit out their traditional base, he could very quickly become a very viable political figure. He appears very skillful at dealing with a hostile press so far and presents himself very well. With the current political atmosphere (and Starmer doing his best to extinguish any kind of brand loyalty to Labour among voters), things are very elastic at present - just like Farage, if the momentum shifts, it could suddenly transition from "A vote for the Greens is a vote for Reform in FPtP" to "A vote for Labour is a wasted vote - only Polanski can save us from Reform".

Puja
If the Greens do not run in every constituency, they're not going to win...so a vote for the Greens pretty much IS giving Reform the win.
The Greens do stand in every constituency (well, almost every - they've stood aside for other genuine left options before)? I don't know what you mean by that.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 1917
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 4:52 pm
Stom wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 3:08 pm
Puja wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 1:33 pm

I don't know we'll get a Green PM next election, but I think Polanski's really got something about him and, if Labour continue to shit out their traditional base, he could very quickly become a very viable political figure. He appears very skillful at dealing with a hostile press so far and presents himself very well. With the current political atmosphere (and Starmer doing his best to extinguish any kind of brand loyalty to Labour among voters), things are very elastic at present - just like Farage, if the momentum shifts, it could suddenly transition from "A vote for the Greens is a vote for Reform in FPtP" to "A vote for Labour is a wasted vote - only Polanski can save us from Reform".

Puja
If the Greens do not run in every constituency, they're not going to win...so a vote for the Greens pretty much IS giving Reform the win.
The Greens do stand in every constituency (well, almost every - they've stood aside for other genuine left options before)? I don't know what you mean by that.

Puja
OK, sorry. I seem to remember them not standing everywhere in order to make their budget stretch further.

Plus, Polanski saying he's targeting a handful of seats...that's not good enough rhetoric, imo. He says a lot of good things, but I'm not convinced he's the man to break the corruption cycle that grips British politics.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 4:54 pm
Puja wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 4:52 pm
Stom wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 3:08 pm

If the Greens do not run in every constituency, they're not going to win...so a vote for the Greens pretty much IS giving Reform the win.
The Greens do stand in every constituency (well, almost every - they've stood aside for other genuine left options before)? I don't know what you mean by that.

Puja
OK, sorry. I seem to remember them not standing everywhere in order to make their budget stretch further.

Plus, Polanski saying he's targeting a handful of seats...that's not good enough rhetoric, imo. He says a lot of good things, but I'm not convinced he's the man to break the corruption cycle that grips British politics.
I think you're thinking of the wrong Green there. It was the old leadership team that was after a handful of seats and slow, cautious growth. He's the one that campaigned on learning from Reform's ambition and looking to attract national attention as a disruptive force offering an alternative to the people who want things to be different without going fascist.

Not saying he's necessarily going to succeed, but if there's one thing you can't accuse him of, it's being too conservative (double-meaning intended).

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Sandydragon
Site Admin
Posts: 5916
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

The Greens don’t have a prayer of succeeding on their own. Better to have a few target seats and look at tactical voting options which might get them enough to be a coalition junior partner.

Based on current voting intentions (and yes there’s a long long way to go) it’s all about keeping Reform out. Tactical voting again will be key and better a Conservative MP is returned than a Reform one.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Sandydragon wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 10:38 pm The Greens don’t have a prayer of succeeding on their own. Better to have a few target seats and look at tactical voting options which might get them enough to be a coalition junior partner.
Mind, we would've said that about Reform not too long ago.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Sandydragon
Site Admin
Posts: 5916
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 1:11 am
Sandydragon wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 10:38 pm The Greens don’t have a prayer of succeeding on their own. Better to have a few target seats and look at tactical voting options which might get them enough to be a coalition junior partner.
Mind, we would've said that about Reform not too long ago.

Puja
They have 5 MPs despite significant public support over the past decade. The implosion of the Tories drove many to reform, Labour is nowhere near that bad, despite the best efforts of the media to portray them that way and fickle supporters.

The reality check is that the uk won’t vote in enough numbers for the Greens, particularly with their new direction. If anything, it will motivate voters to support the party most likely to stop them.

Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Labour Party machinery, Momentum and a Tory PM who was both hated and a very poor campaigner, and who pissed off her core support just before the election, he failed.

As things stand the next PM will be Starmer or Farage. Time for some grown up politics to keep Reform out of power.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 1917
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 1:11 am
Sandydragon wrote: Fri Oct 03, 2025 10:38 pm The Greens don’t have a prayer of succeeding on their own. Better to have a few target seats and look at tactical voting options which might get them enough to be a coalition junior partner.
Mind, we would've said that about Reform not too long ago.

Puja
They have 5 MPs despite significant public support over the past decade. The implosion of the Tories drove many to reform, Labour is nowhere near that bad, despite the best efforts of the media to portray them that way and fickle supporters.

The reality check is that the uk won’t vote in enough numbers for the Greens, particularly with their new direction. If anything, it will motivate voters to support the party most likely to stop them.

Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Labour Party machinery, Momentum and a Tory PM who was both hated and a very poor campaigner, and who pissed off her core support just before the election, he failed.

As things stand the next PM will be Starmer or Farage. Time for some grown up politics to keep Reform out of power.
As usual, I think you’re completely wrong there.

“Grown up politics” is what got us in this mess in the first place.

Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.

Because that’s what reform do and other alt right agitators, and they’re correct. Just they also promote racist, fascist rhetoric. So don’t. Just talk policy, talk situations, talk solutions. And ensure the message is clear and easy to understand:

Doctor waiting times are insane. We need to be able to attract more doctors and cut down paperwork, here is an idea.

The tax system is working against you. We want working people to have more money in their pockets. We want families who have built themselves up to not need to face crippling tax bills, but we also need to spend. So we cut corruption by slashing Whitehall budgets for assistants, stopping the corruption by local government: just look at how much of your money reform have spent on employing family members. In this one council alone, they stole £250.000 of your money, money that could have been spent on fixing potholes, fixing the school roof, hiring an extra few staff at the clinic so you get seen quicker.

That’s what’s needed.

Call out the corruption directly. Don’t worry about stepping on feet. Burn all political bridges. The game is rigged. It doesn’t work by being a “grown up” it works by playing dirty. Without the bigoted rhetoric.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Parliamentary Labour Party actively briefing against him throughout the election, a concerted media campaign to smear and denigrate him, his problematic past positions, a massively reported-on anti-Semitism scandal, and his own ineptness at leadership and public communicatons, he took over 40% of the vote, a full 7% more than Starmer achieved during a complete Tory implosion.
FTFY. :D

It seems weird to say adamently, "The British electorate won't vote for socialism" using Corbyn as the example - for one thing, 'socialism' nowadays is 'completely centrist politics' from 15-20 years ago and the policies themselves poll incredibly well, much better than the current centrist "more austerity, but better this time."

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:32 am Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.


Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:34 am
Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Parliamentary Labour Party actively briefing against him throughout the election, a concerted media campaign to smear and denigrate him, his problematic past positions, a massively reported-on anti-Semitism scandal, and his own ineptness at leadership and public communicatons, he took over 40% of the vote, a full 7% more than Starmer achieved during a complete Tory implosion.
FTFY. :D

It seems weird to say adamently, "The British electorate won't vote for socialism" using Corbyn as the example - for one thing, 'socialism' nowadays is 'completely centrist politics' from 15-20 years ago and the policies themselves poll incredibly well, much better than the current centrist "more austerity, but better this time."

Puja
Yes, I was going to say something along those lines - the Labour party machinery working for Corbyn?? :lol: The Blairites preferred to sabotage him from within - better for them to lose the election than to have a left wing PM.

Corbyn was the only major party leader in more than 30 years to offer socialism - his falling short of victory hardly proves the country wouldn't vote for it.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

I made myself watch Yaxley-Lennon's speech from the 13th Sept rally because someone I know said that she was there and heard not one racist/anti immigrant/fascist remark, despite being a Lithuanian immigrant herself. Perhaps it was a different rally :| .

Anyway, it was sort of interesting to see what Y-L had to say (or croak, as he was losing his voice).

Basically, after lying that it was the biggest demo in Britain's history, and saying things like we are strong and the government is trembling, the only thing he did was complain about immigrants. Particularly Somalians, Afghans and Pakistanis. Then he just got all the flags of the UK out in succession for a cheer. Oh yeah, and one sneaky referenece to 'globalist' something or other.

Also, he and his flag wavers had some kind of cross symbol on their sleeves. Where the Nazis wore their swastikas. I'm sure it wasn't anything fascistic.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

I've probably confused the hell out of my YouTube algorithm :shock: . With its usual subtlety I expect to be seeing far-right suggestions amongst my usual mix of far left, sci-fi, maths and literature.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 4978
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Which Tyler »

Son of Mathonwy wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:33 pm I've probably confused the hell out of my YouTube algorithm :shock: . With its usual subtlety I expect to be seeing far-right suggestions amongst my usual mix of far left, sci-fi, maths and literature.
Private browsing isn't just for porn
User avatar
Sandydragon
Site Admin
Posts: 5916
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:40 am
Stom wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:32 am Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.


Puja
The Greens appear to be backing the idea of leaving Nato. Student union politics.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Site Admin
Posts: 5916
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Son of Mathonwy wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:47 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:34 am
Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Parliamentary Labour Party actively briefing against him throughout the election, a concerted media campaign to smear and denigrate him, his problematic past positions, a massively reported-on anti-Semitism scandal, and his own ineptness at leadership and public communicatons, he took over 40% of the vote, a full 7% more than Starmer achieved during a complete Tory implosion.
FTFY. :D

It seems weird to say adamently, "The British electorate won't vote for socialism" using Corbyn as the example - for one thing, 'socialism' nowadays is 'completely centrist politics' from 15-20 years ago and the policies themselves poll incredibly well, much better than the current centrist "more austerity, but better this time."

Puja
Yes, I was going to say something along those lines - the Labour party machinery working for Corbyn?? :lol: The Blairites preferred to sabotage him from within - better for them to lose the election than to have a left wing PM.

Corbyn was the only major party leader in more than 30 years to offer socialism - his falling short of victory hardly proves the country wouldn't vote for it.
Yep. All those activists at a local level and the life long Labour voters. The money, the infrastructure etc etc etc.

And still he lost despite the Glastonbury chants. He had everything in his favour and still couldn’t get a majority.
User avatar
Sandydragon
Site Admin
Posts: 5916
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Sandydragon »

Stom wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:32 am
Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 1:11 am

Mind, we would've said that about Reform not too long ago.

Puja
They have 5 MPs despite significant public support over the past decade. The implosion of the Tories drove many to reform, Labour is nowhere near that bad, despite the best efforts of the media to portray them that way and fickle supporters.

The reality check is that the uk won’t vote in enough numbers for the Greens, particularly with their new direction. If anything, it will motivate voters to support the party most likely to stop them.

Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Labour Party machinery, Momentum and a Tory PM who was both hated and a very poor campaigner, and who pissed off her core support just before the election, he failed.

As things stand the next PM will be Starmer or Farage. Time for some grown up politics to keep Reform out of power.
As usual, I think you’re completely wrong there.

“Grown up politics” is what got us in this mess in the first place.

Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.

Because that’s what reform do and other alt right agitators, and they’re correct. Just they also promote racist, fascist rhetoric. So don’t. Just talk policy, talk situations, talk solutions. And ensure the message is clear and easy to understand:

Doctor waiting times are insane. We need to be able to attract more doctors and cut down paperwork, here is an idea.

The tax system is working against you. We want working people to have more money in their pockets. We want families who have built themselves up to not need to face crippling tax bills, but we also need to spend. So we cut corruption by slashing Whitehall budgets for assistants, stopping the corruption by local government: just look at how much of your money reform have spent on employing family members. In this one council alone, they stole £250.000 of your money, money that could have been spent on fixing potholes, fixing the school roof, hiring an extra few staff at the clinic so you get seen quicker.

That’s what’s needed.

Call out the corruption directly. Don’t worry about stepping on feet. Burn all political bridges. The game is rigged. It doesn’t work by being a “grown up” it works by playing dirty. Without the bigoted rhetoric.
Nope.

Why are you listing a populist party along side the establishment. Reform are populists yet there they are governing badly. No surprise there and they would be a disaster at a national level. So too would the student union style politics of the greens and the left more widely. Without growth which Starmer is struggling to get his head around, there is no money for any of the projects that will improve people’s lives.

Waiting times are insane in parts of the country. So how about we look at ideas to fund the NHS better which might not be just about increasing taxation for everyone. Waiting times were coming down under the Blair government, so woe who grasped that you needed a better economy to support better services.

I fully agree that politicians need to stand up against the worst of the right wing rhetoric about immigrants. Note it’s not racist to talk about immigration in general and that’s the mistake many on the left have made previously and alienated people along the way. But opposing the worst of the anti immigrant propaganda doesn’t mean ignore the issue all together.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Which Tyler wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 11:32 pm
Son of Mathonwy wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 6:33 pm I've probably confused the hell out of my YouTube algorithm :shock: . With its usual subtlety I expect to be seeing far-right suggestions amongst my usual mix of far left, sci-fi, maths and literature.
Private browsing isn't just for porn
Actually, the algorithm was smart enough to see this as an aberration. Normally I look at one thing and every third video suggested is a carbon copy. This time I got away with it.
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Sandydragon wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:12 am
Son of Mathonwy wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:47 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:34 am

FTFY. :D

It seems weird to say adamently, "The British electorate won't vote for socialism" using Corbyn as the example - for one thing, 'socialism' nowadays is 'completely centrist politics' from 15-20 years ago and the policies themselves poll incredibly well, much better than the current centrist "more austerity, but better this time."

Puja
Yes, I was going to say something along those lines - the Labour party machinery working for Corbyn?? :lol: The Blairites preferred to sabotage him from within - better for them to lose the election than to have a left wing PM.

Corbyn was the only major party leader in more than 30 years to offer socialism - his falling short of victory hardly proves the country wouldn't vote for it.
Yep. All those activists at a local level and the life long Labour voters. The money, the infrastructure etc etc etc.

And still he lost despite the Glastonbury chants. He had everything in his favour and still couldn’t get a majority.
If you're still saying he had everything in his favour you haven't been reading anything we've been saying.

Corbyn has many flaws. These and many things working against him, within his party, in the media and the electoral system itself, meant that he fell short of victory (although he did rob the Tories of their majority).

The single example in more than 30 years of a left-wing leader failing to gain a majority doesn't remotely mean that left-wing politics can't be popular or can't work in government.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Sandydragon wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:09 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:40 am
Stom wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:32 am Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.


Puja
The Greens appear to be backing the idea of leaving Nato. Student union politics.
Surely student union politics would be something like looking at a headline and forming an opinion on a subject without actually understanding any of the detail, because the headline and initial impression matches your pre-existing bias.

Polanski is in favour of leaving NATO, yes, on the basis that the US aren't a reliable partner and haven't been for a long time, so having our entire defence plan be based around an alliance that relies on them is foolishness. If you listen to what he actually says, it's not "let's leave NATO tomorrow; I'm sure it'll be fine, wheeee!" but instead "Let's form alternate regional defensive alliances and pacts to replace NATO, because it is getting steadily less fit for purpose."

But it is probably easier to just not think and assume he's an imbecile because you've already made up your mind that Greens are "student union politics".

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 1917
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Sandydragon wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:19 am
Stom wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:32 am
Sandydragon wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 8:26 am
They have 5 MPs despite significant public support over the past decade. The implosion of the Tories drove many to reform, Labour is nowhere near that bad, despite the best efforts of the media to portray them that way and fickle supporters.

The reality check is that the uk won’t vote in enough numbers for the Greens, particularly with their new direction. If anything, it will motivate voters to support the party most likely to stop them.

Corbyn came closest. Yet despite the Labour Party machinery, Momentum and a Tory PM who was both hated and a very poor campaigner, and who pissed off her core support just before the election, he failed.

As things stand the next PM will be Starmer or Farage. Time for some grown up politics to keep Reform out of power.
As usual, I think you’re completely wrong there.

“Grown up politics” is what got us in this mess in the first place.

Someone needs to be a populist, and loudly talk about the actual issues, and ignore or sidestep every single question about migrants, trans rights, wars, etc. They need to be vocal, loud, and heavily criticize the political class who have allowed this situation to happen.

Because that’s what reform do and other alt right agitators, and they’re correct. Just they also promote racist, fascist rhetoric. So don’t. Just talk policy, talk situations, talk solutions. And ensure the message is clear and easy to understand:

Doctor waiting times are insane. We need to be able to attract more doctors and cut down paperwork, here is an idea.

The tax system is working against you. We want working people to have more money in their pockets. We want families who have built themselves up to not need to face crippling tax bills, but we also need to spend. So we cut corruption by slashing Whitehall budgets for assistants, stopping the corruption by local government: just look at how much of your money reform have spent on employing family members. In this one council alone, they stole £250.000 of your money, money that could have been spent on fixing potholes, fixing the school roof, hiring an extra few staff at the clinic so you get seen quicker.

That’s what’s needed.

Call out the corruption directly. Don’t worry about stepping on feet. Burn all political bridges. The game is rigged. It doesn’t work by being a “grown up” it works by playing dirty. Without the bigoted rhetoric.
Nope.

Why are you listing a populist party along side the establishment. Reform are populists yet there they are governing badly. No surprise there and they would be a disaster at a national level. So too would the student union style politics of the greens and the left more widely. Without growth which Starmer is struggling to get his head around, there is no money for any of the projects that will improve people’s lives.

Waiting times are insane in parts of the country. So how about we look at ideas to fund the NHS better which might not be just about increasing taxation for everyone. Waiting times were coming down under the Blair government, so woe who grasped that you needed a better economy to support better services.

I fully agree that politicians need to stand up against the worst of the right wing rhetoric about immigrants. Note it’s not racist to talk about immigration in general and that’s the mistake many on the left have made previously and alienated people along the way. But opposing the worst of the anti immigrant propaganda doesn’t mean ignore the issue all together.
I can fall back on what is happening/what happened in Hungarian politics to show an example.

In Hungary, there is a party of a former PM. He was the leader, and he passed it on to his wife. I am friends with a high profile MP and leading light from one of the major left leaning parties, and I told him almost a decade ago that, in order to win an election, the opposition needed to "kill off" this former PM's party before going after the government. Because the government would just use them as bogeymen against them. First thing that Peter Magyar did when starting his movement was to rail against this former PM's party and basically wipe them out. And then, suddenly, the government has no stick to beat him with. No Soros, no migrants (he doesn't talk about it), no Pride (he didn't get involved), no former PM.

A winning party needs to distance itself from Reform, it needs to distance itself from Labour, the Tories, the Lib Dems, and the Greens. And that is the only way.

And by being populist, I mean by talking like one. Using the language of the people, not the language of politics. Not talking about difficult political decisions, but talking about making the policy work, and that's it. Having a core of policies and not getting sidetracked with other details (like NATO, for one).

As for growth...that is simply not true. Growth in and of itself does nothing. The economy has been "growing" in recent years, yet small businesses, spend at supermarkets, basically any spending on non-luxury goods and non-tech companies, have fallen. Because the real driver of a successful economy, and the real driver of public services and society as a whole, is how much disposable income the average person has to spend.

If the top 5% have more than ever, but they're spending it all on luxury goods owned by companies/individuals from outside the country...are you really growing the economy? Despite growth being high?

Or if the bottom 5% have actually got some money to spend and are going down their local high street and buying British beef again, instead of going to Lidl and getting imported meat for half the cost because they simply cannot afford to shop local?

You need the little man to spend to have a successful society. Blair was in charge of a booming economy by luck more than judgement. It was the "golden era" of the post-capitalist world, where the wealth was in the process of being redistributed to the super rich rather than actually all in their hands already. He got lucky. And so did Cameron. And their actions, and their political beliefs, and their self-serving nature led us to what we have now.

They got rich(er) off the backs of policies designed to enrich themselves and their friends, and we do not stand up and call them traitors, treasonists, and demand that they give their ill gotten gains back to the people of the United Kingdom.

Why the hell there isn't a party emblazoning billboards with what Hunt did around the 7 flats, I do not know.

THAT is what I mean by populist. Highlighting how all these parties have stood up and committed fraud against the British people. Highlighting how they have got rich off their time in office. And lumping Reform into them. Highlighting the spend of Farage.

But NOT getting involved in social issues.

So, yeah. That
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 1917
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:28 pm
Sandydragon wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:09 am
Puja wrote: Sat Oct 04, 2025 9:40 am



Puja
The Greens appear to be backing the idea of leaving Nato. Student union politics.
Surely student union politics would be something like looking at a headline and forming an opinion on a subject without actually understanding any of the detail, because the headline and initial impression matches your pre-existing bias.

Polanski is in favour of leaving NATO, yes, on the basis that the US aren't a reliable partner and haven't been for a long time, so having our entire defence plan be based around an alliance that relies on them is foolishness. If you listen to what he actually says, it's not "let's leave NATO tomorrow; I'm sure it'll be fine, wheeee!" but instead "Let's form alternate regional defensive alliances and pacts to replace NATO, because it is getting steadily less fit for purpose."

But it is probably easier to just not think and assume he's an imbecile because you've already made up your mind that Greens are "student union politics".

Puja
The thing is...he has a valid point...

It's an interesting debating topic. Would it win them a single new vote? No. Can it turn people off of them? Absolutely.

It's imbecilic. There is no potential upside. Seriously, right now I don't care what Magyar's actual political ideology is (I probably disagree with him in the main), but he's the only politician I've seen who has actually played the game to win against this rhetoric.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 9:37 am
Puja wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:28 pm
Sandydragon wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 9:09 am

The Greens appear to be backing the idea of leaving Nato. Student union politics.
Surely student union politics would be something like looking at a headline and forming an opinion on a subject without actually understanding any of the detail, because the headline and initial impression matches your pre-existing bias.

Polanski is in favour of leaving NATO, yes, on the basis that the US aren't a reliable partner and haven't been for a long time, so having our entire defence plan be based around an alliance that relies on them is foolishness. If you listen to what he actually says, it's not "let's leave NATO tomorrow; I'm sure it'll be fine, wheeee!" but instead "Let's form alternate regional defensive alliances and pacts to replace NATO, because it is getting steadily less fit for purpose."

But it is probably easier to just not think and assume he's an imbecile because you've already made up your mind that Greens are "student union politics".

Puja
The thing is...he has a valid point...

It's an interesting debating topic. Would it win them a single new vote? No. Can it turn people off of them? Absolutely.

It's imbecilic. There is no potential upside. Seriously, right now I don't care what Magyar's actual political ideology is (I probably disagree with him in the main), but he's the only politician I've seen who has actually played the game to win against this rhetoric.
I would argue that the upside is that Trump is largely detested in this country and there are votes to be earned for the Greens from the voters grimacing at the sight of Starmer and Lammy licking Trump's balls, by putting forward policies that propose more independence and distance from the US.

Having said that, it's also not official Green policy (yet), but Polanski's previously publically stated opinion, which has only come up because the media are digging to try and find things to smear him with (other than, "Haha, he engaged with a Sun article during his previous career as a hypnotherapist and they made him look like an idiot!") and he's had to answer questions about it in every single interview.

Plus, I don't mind a politician having beliefs and morals, even ones I don't believe in myself (as long as not crossing any of my red lines). Just "playing the game" and "talk less, smile more" is what gave us Starmer.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 1917
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Stom »

Puja wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 10:13 am
Stom wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 9:37 am
Puja wrote: Sun Oct 05, 2025 6:28 pm

Surely student union politics would be something like looking at a headline and forming an opinion on a subject without actually understanding any of the detail, because the headline and initial impression matches your pre-existing bias.

Polanski is in favour of leaving NATO, yes, on the basis that the US aren't a reliable partner and haven't been for a long time, so having our entire defence plan be based around an alliance that relies on them is foolishness. If you listen to what he actually says, it's not "let's leave NATO tomorrow; I'm sure it'll be fine, wheeee!" but instead "Let's form alternate regional defensive alliances and pacts to replace NATO, because it is getting steadily less fit for purpose."

But it is probably easier to just not think and assume he's an imbecile because you've already made up your mind that Greens are "student union politics".

Puja
The thing is...he has a valid point...

It's an interesting debating topic. Would it win them a single new vote? No. Can it turn people off of them? Absolutely.

It's imbecilic. There is no potential upside. Seriously, right now I don't care what Magyar's actual political ideology is (I probably disagree with him in the main), but he's the only politician I've seen who has actually played the game to win against this rhetoric.
I would argue that the upside is that Trump is largely detested in this country and there are votes to be earned for the Greens from the voters grimacing at the sight of Starmer and Lammy licking Trump's balls, by putting forward policies that propose more independence and distance from the US.

Having said that, it's also not official Green policy (yet), but Polanski's previously publically stated opinion, which has only come up because the media are digging to try and find things to smear him with (other than, "Haha, he engaged with a Sun article during his previous career as a hypnotherapist and they made him look like an idiot!") and he's had to answer questions about it in every single interview.

Plus, I don't mind a politician having beliefs and morals, even ones I don't believe in myself (as long as not crossing any of my red lines). Just "playing the game" and "talk less, smile more" is what gave us Starmer.

Puja
They don't need to win over those people, though, they need to win over Reform voters...and lapsed Tory voters who aren't sure who to vote for. The former Labour voters will take care of themselves (ourselves?).

Again, sorry to keep quoting Hungarian politics, but it's a pretty extreme and obvious example here. My wife asked the same question, about why Magyar was using the lannguage he was using and not getting involved in societal issues at all, and not talking to any of her friends or circle. And it's simple: she will vote for him. Not because she likes him but because there is no other choice.

And others will do the same.

The voters who need convincing are voters like my parents. Former centrists who have been radicalised to far right, but not as far as Reform. Who would vote Tory, but they're a joke right now. And who are unsure who the hell they could vote for.

THAT is the void that needs filling, and it doesn't get filled with social rhetoric, but with lifestyle. With promoting policies that will improve public services while being very clear that they will not harm pension pots of people with less than £x saved. And £x can be high enough.
User avatar
Puja
Site Admin
Posts: 7845
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 10:35 am
Puja wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 10:13 am
Stom wrote: Mon Oct 06, 2025 9:37 am

The thing is...he has a valid point...

It's an interesting debating topic. Would it win them a single new vote? No. Can it turn people off of them? Absolutely.

It's imbecilic. There is no potential upside. Seriously, right now I don't care what Magyar's actual political ideology is (I probably disagree with him in the main), but he's the only politician I've seen who has actually played the game to win against this rhetoric.
I would argue that the upside is that Trump is largely detested in this country and there are votes to be earned for the Greens from the voters grimacing at the sight of Starmer and Lammy licking Trump's balls, by putting forward policies that propose more independence and distance from the US.

Having said that, it's also not official Green policy (yet), but Polanski's previously publically stated opinion, which has only come up because the media are digging to try and find things to smear him with (other than, "Haha, he engaged with a Sun article during his previous career as a hypnotherapist and they made him look like an idiot!") and he's had to answer questions about it in every single interview.

Plus, I don't mind a politician having beliefs and morals, even ones I don't believe in myself (as long as not crossing any of my red lines). Just "playing the game" and "talk less, smile more" is what gave us Starmer.

Puja
They don't need to win over those people, though, they need to win over Reform voters...and lapsed Tory voters who aren't sure who to vote for. The former Labour voters will take care of themselves (ourselves?).
That's very much putting the cart before the horse. The Greens need to eat Labour first, otherwise they will be marginalised by "Greens cannot win here; anything but a vote for Starmer is a vote for Farage" advertising.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Son of Mathonwy
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm

Re: Snap General Election called

Post by Son of Mathonwy »

Probably the next Tory leader:
I went to Handsworth in Birmingham the other day to do a video on litter and it was absolutely appalling. It’s as close as I’ve come to a slum in this country. But the other thing I noticed there was that it was one of the worst integrated places I’ve ever been to. In fact, in the hour and a half I was filming news there I didn’t see another white face.
That’s not the kind of country I want to live in.
I want to live in a country where people are properly integrated. It’s not about the colour of your skin or your faith, of course it isn’t. But I want people to be living alongside each other, not parallel lives. That’s not the right way we want to live as a country.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... birmingham

It's more whistle than dog whistle. Maybe he'll bring some of the racists home from Reform.
Post Reply