I can understand why so many England fans focus on it, but selection is absolutely not the problem England have atm.
Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 12:30 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
-
- Posts: 19052
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1982
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
Selection is obviously not the whole problem, but I'd say it is a significant part. An international team will not progress containing players not up to international standard, never mind how good (or bad!) the game plan and tactics may be. It only needs a few square pegs to screw up team performance. Of the current lot, quite a few probably should not be near the squad E.g. Youngs, Faz, Tuilagi, Malins, Billy VP, Stuart and possibly Lawes, Earls.
-
- Posts: 2507
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
Just to nitpick, Stuart hasn't shit the bed and we don't have a lot of tightheads to choose from. On board with the rest of your discards.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
[quote=Spiffy post_id=301379 time=1692998681 user_id=265]
. An international team will not progress containing players not up to international standard, never mind how good (or bad!) the game plan and tactics may be. [/quote=Spiffy post_id=301379 time=1692998681 user_id=265]
Sorry, but this is a bit of a stretch.
The Aussies spent years being pretty competitive with a tight 5 that was getting minced because they had a game plan that took that into account.
The All Blacks generally manage off the back of at best passable front rows.
Argentina and Japan have shown you can rock up to the world cup with players who have struggled in European pro domestic league but have good runs because you've drilled a game plan for the players they have.
Georgia manage to be competitive at world cups with very limited resources because they get organised with what they have.
Why England can't manage to do the same is a mystery, but I suspect it comes down to a refusal to accept that we can't somehow find a word class player in every position and therefore won't adopt a suitable plan for what we have.
. An international team will not progress containing players not up to international standard, never mind how good (or bad!) the game plan and tactics may be. [/quote=Spiffy post_id=301379 time=1692998681 user_id=265]
Sorry, but this is a bit of a stretch.
The Aussies spent years being pretty competitive with a tight 5 that was getting minced because they had a game plan that took that into account.
The All Blacks generally manage off the back of at best passable front rows.
Argentina and Japan have shown you can rock up to the world cup with players who have struggled in European pro domestic league but have good runs because you've drilled a game plan for the players they have.
Georgia manage to be competitive at world cups with very limited resources because they get organised with what they have.
Why England can't manage to do the same is a mystery, but I suspect it comes down to a refusal to accept that we can't somehow find a word class player in every position and therefore won't adopt a suitable plan for what we have.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14552
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
https://x.com/dominicrumbles/status/169 ... MV3j-SK8yQ
So you’re saying there’s a chance of setting a new record…
So you’re saying there’s a chance of setting a new record…
-
- Posts: 19052
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
sentiment good, practicality of better replacements less certain. Which is why selection isn't top of the problems imo (faz aside; though tbh, him on the bench theoretically gives more options, even if I do think he's a shyte 12)
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2022 12:30 pm
Re: Ireland vs England - 5:30pm Saturday
That’s exactly my thinking too. In nearly all cases, I don’t agree the next cabs off the rank are the upgrades that some people seem to think they are. And even if they were, I don’t see your structures changing and, for me, that’s your biggest problem. Under Jones and Sweaty Bollocks you haven’t kept up with innovations in attacking and defensive structures the way other top sides have. Regardless of what players you had, I don’t think your coaches have either the smarts or experience to deliver an effective game at this level, to be blunt.