paddy no 11 wrote:There's a real prospect of deaths tomorrow in the world's greatest democracy yeah![]()
Hope it doesn't happen
Yeah. Me too.
How about this?Zhivago wrote:I saw the video of this, if this sort of political intimidation isn't indicative of fascism then I don't know what is.
Therein lies the only discernibly consistent policy focus of this administration. If it’s all white, it’s all right.WaspInWales wrote:How about this?Zhivago wrote:I saw the video of this, if this sort of political intimidation isn't indicative of fascism then I don't know what is.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Where have I written that we have to hear them out? I suggested that America wasn’t at the Black/Brown shirt or communist level of intimidation yet. Read the post FFS.cashead wrote:For real, Sandy. Fuck off with this "we gots to hears thems outs!" bullshit, yo. Those cunts do not deserve the benefit of the doubt whatsoever.Zhivago wrote:I saw the video of this, if this sort of political intimidation isn't indicative of fascism then I don't know what is.cashead wrote:
Hmm yes, can't imagine why someone would think the MAGAshirts had ill intent. It's not like they rammed a staffer's car and tried to run them off the road or anything.
I mean, straight from the mouths of the MAGA mouth pieces.
Completely missed the point being made. Well done.Zhivago wrote:I saw the video of this, if this sort of political intimidation isn't indicative of fascism then I don't know what is.cashead wrote:Hmm yes, can't imagine why someone would think the MAGAshirts had ill intent. It's not like they rammed a staffer's car and tried to run them off the road or anything.Sandydragon wrote: Do you know that they would have resorted to that? Sorry, being pedantic but we cannot know the real intention. It's possible that the mob could have been whipped up to anger and violence, or they could have chanted some unpleasant phrases and left it at that.
I was simply commenting on the intimidation by Trump's militia. Am I not allowed to? Please tell me the rules of debate, Sir Sandy.Sandydragon wrote:Completely missed the point being made. Well done.
Have I said that you can't comment? Don't think I have.Zhivago wrote:I was simply commenting on the intimidation by Trump's militia. Am I not allowed to? Please tell me the rules of debate, Sir Sandy.Sandydragon wrote:Completely missed the point being made. Well done.
Emotions running high I think? Water off a ducks back mate.gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
Sandy was specifically responding to me saying I thought they'd take people off the bus and beat them if they'd managed to stop the bus. It wasn't saying "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were," it was saying, "We don't know if they would've escalated to dragging people off the bus to beat them." Whether you agree or disagree with them, I was posing a hypothetical and they were perfectly entitled to disagree.cashead wrote:Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Enough Cashead.cashead wrote:Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?gransoporro wrote:May I ask where the targeting of Sandy is coming from?
I read his posts yesterday and I did not read denial of what happened or dismissing other posters or their posts. Did I miss something?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
Don’t blame you. I hope there’s no problems in your areamorepork wrote:I'm taking two ambien with a pint of red wine tonight and will deal with shit tomorrow.
Goodbye Cashead. Take a break.cashead wrote:How about not both sides-ing shit to the point of cowardice that you expect people to play nice with open bigots, then? That would be a nice change of pace.Sandydragon wrote:Enough Cashead.cashead wrote: Saying shit like "oh, but we don't know what their intentions really were" is a pretty clear downplaying of it. But then again, what else do you expect from a bootlicker like him?
I mean, he is the guy who got pissy at me because I didn't play nice with a racist.
You were given a warning for your own behaviour. I’m getting bored of you throwing insults about when people don’t agree with you.
Sandyvagina and Asshead bickering getting too much for you as well?morepork wrote:I'm taking two ambien with a pint of red wine tonight and will deal with shit tomorrow.
Don’t abuse other posters. That’s the basic rule. If you act like a cunt then don’t cry when you get banned. Can’t put it much simpler to be fair.Mikey Brown wrote:We can say what we want in here, right? Please don’t ban me.
You nearly always manage to come across as very simple, so congrats.Sandydragon wrote:Don’t abuse other posters. That’s the basic rule. If you act like a cunt then don’t cry when you get banned. Can’t put it much simpler to be fair.Mikey Brown wrote:We can say what we want in here, right? Please don’t ban me.
Shit, didn't realise we could choose.Donny osmond wrote:Mikey I mean
Sent from my CPH1951 using Tapatalk