Page 1 of 4

Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 1:11 am
by WaspInWales
What we thinking then?

The Ruskies got careless amid the Skripal case and managed to leave some of the deadliest nerve agent known to man lying around a few miles from where they were accused of attacking a former agent and his daughter?

Said nerve agent has again managed to only affect two people.

Either Novichok's abilities are massively overstated, or the Ruskies have truly pinpointed how best to use it...or something else?

Porton Down is around the corner though, right?

Yes, but Russia is a few thousand miles away.

Hmmm, but Boots the Chemist, ohh and a church!

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 11:11 am
by Mellsblue
I think this guy might be on to something:

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2018 12:37 pm
by SerjeantWildgoose
What he fails to realise is that Larkhill and Durrington are just as ridiculously close to Stonehenge, with the added advantage of not having to cross the busy A303. With Larkhill full of Gunners and Durrington full of unemployed knuckle-draggers it is obvious that these things are all linked.

In fact anyone who knows his henges will tell you that Woodhenge is the more archeologically significant site and that it and the Countess Services are irrefutable evidence of a prehistoric invasion of the earth by aliens who breathe pig slurry and piss Novichok.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 9:01 am
by Zhivago
For me there are question marks around how it stayed potent after so much time.

http://theconversation.com/how-novichok ... tion-99464

The only scenario that is believable is that these people are homeless drug addicts and they accidentally found and used a syringe that was used by the person who originally administered novichok.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2018 11:30 am
by WaspInWales
Maybe this latest couple are the double, double, double agents that Russia used to deliver the first attack?

Perhaps they were preparing for a picnic in idyllic rural Wiltshire to enjoy the heatwave. They made some beat and radish sarnies, brewed up some borscht and packed their favourite brand of Vodka (flown over especially from the motherland)...then they made the rookie error of mistaking the bottled Novichok in a spray bottle for the suncream.

Can happen to anyone I suppose.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:28 am
by Digby
Zhivago wrote:For me there are question marks around how it stayed potent after so much time.

http://theconversation.com/how-novichok ... tion-99464

The only scenario that is believable is that these people are homeless drug addicts and they accidentally found and used a syringe that was used by the person who originally administered novichok.
If that's your only believable scenario you're frankly a bit sick

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:44 pm
by Zhivago
Digby wrote:
Zhivago wrote:For me there are question marks around how it stayed potent after so much time.

http://theconversation.com/how-novichok ... tion-99464

The only scenario that is believable is that these people are homeless drug addicts and they accidentally found and used a syringe that was used by the person who originally administered novichok.
If that's your only believable scenario you're frankly a bit sick
And what scenario are you running with?

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:53 pm
by morepork
A syringe? A nerve agent was administered with a syringe?

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 5:32 pm
by Digby
I'm not running with any supposed scenario, I don't know the people nor remotely enough about the science to make a reasonable guess.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:18 pm
by morepork
Digby wrote:I'm not running with any supposed scenario, I don't know the people nor remotely enough about the science to make a reasonable guess.

Wouldn't be my delivery device of choice for a covert operation.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 6:28 pm
by Zhivago
morepork wrote:
Digby wrote:I'm not running with any supposed scenario, I don't know the people nor remotely enough about the science to make a reasonable guess.

Wouldn't be my delivery device of choice for a covert operation.
Not for delivering, for mixing precursors

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:48 pm
by morepork
Zhivago wrote:
morepork wrote:
Digby wrote:I'm not running with any supposed scenario, I don't know the people nor remotely enough about the science to make a reasonable guess.

Wouldn't be my delivery device of choice for a covert operation.
Not for delivering, for mixing precursors

Sounds very clumsy.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:23 pm
by Mellsblue
I suspect the Russian agent used a poison tipped dagger that came out of the sole of their shoe. When MI6 retaliate, I’d guess they’ll use a poison tipped umbrella.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:47 pm
by SerjeantWildgoose
The scuttle is that the agent was introduced into the lock of the Scripals’ door by using a needle and syringe. The Scripals then picked up their dose via the contaminated key.

Having gone to that sort of trouble to ensure that the stuff was delivered to a point which was only ever likely to expose the intended target you would have thought they would have taken the utmost care in disposing of the syringe? But maybe they didn’t bank on Amesbury’s resident fag-butt sweepers.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:59 pm
by morepork
Russian biohazard safety training has really gone to the dogs.

Re: RE: Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 10:08 am
by Donny osmond
Zhivago wrote:For me there are question marks around how it stayed potent after so much time.

http://theconversation.com/how-novichok ... tion-99464

The only scenario that is believable is that these people are homeless drug addicts and they accidentally found and used a syringe that was used by the person who originally administered novichok.
Here we go...

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 11:25 am
by kk67
It's not just the proximity of Porton Down that is suspicious...but the fact that Gavin Williamson upped their budget by £20 million just 5 days after the Skripal story kicked off. Without the poisoning I wonder what the public reaction to upping the budget would have been.

Characterising these two new cases as homeless junkies seems bloody suspect as well.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:00 pm
by SerjeantWildgoose
I think it was outrageous of Zhivago to label these people as homeless junkies. They've got a home.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2018 4:30 pm
by kk67
I saw a news report that said 'neighbours claimed they were notorious for picking up cigarette butts off the street'.
You'd have to be high on the psychopathic spectrum to write that sort of shit.

And yet our friendly neighbourhood double-agents are bloody heroes.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 5:44 pm
by Donny osmond
BBC reporting that the source container has been found in the couple's home. So much for needing to mix precursors, turns out (surprising no one except half wit conspiracy nuts) that novichok lasts perfectly well in a sealed container and doesnt need to be created on site, it can be transported from, say, Russia without any problems at all.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:31 pm
by Zhivago
Donny osmond wrote:BBC reporting that the source container has been found in the couple's home. So much for needing to mix precursors, turns out (surprising no one except half wit conspiracy nuts) that novichok lasts perfectly well in a sealed container and doesnt need to be created on site, it can be transported from, say, Russia without any problems at all.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
1) how does this found bottle rule out precursors?
2) how does this found bottle prove it was transported from Russia?
3) how does this found bottle prove it wasn't created on site?

Re: RE: Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 6:43 pm
by Donny osmond
Zhivago wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:BBC reporting that the source container has been found in the couple's home. So much for needing to mix precursors, turns out (surprising no one except half wit conspiracy nuts) that novichok lasts perfectly well in a sealed container and doesnt need to be created on site, it can be transported from, say, Russia without any problems at all.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
1) how does this found bottle rule out precursors?
2) how does this found bottle prove it was transported from Russia?
3) how does this found bottle prove it wasn't created on site?
1. Didn't say it did, just pointed out that it sweeps that entire line of bullshit into the sewer whence it came

2. Didn't say it did, just that its possible

3. Didn't say it did, just that it doesn't have to have been created on site, which again undermines all the conspiracy bullshit.

3/3 on the strawmen tho, which is fine work

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 7:26 pm
by Zhivago
Donny osmond wrote:
Zhivago wrote:
Donny osmond wrote:BBC reporting that the source container has been found in the couple's home. So much for needing to mix precursors, turns out (surprising no one except half wit conspiracy nuts) that novichok lasts perfectly well in a sealed container and doesnt need to be created on site, it can be transported from, say, Russia without any problems at all.

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
1) how does this found bottle rule out precursors?
2) how does this found bottle prove it was transported from Russia?
3) how does this found bottle prove it wasn't created on site?
1. Didn't say it did, just pointed out that it sweeps that entire line of bullshit into the sewer whence it came

2. Didn't say it did, just that its possible

3. Didn't say it did, just that it doesn't have to have been created on site, which again undermines all the conspiracy bullshit.

3/3 on the strawmen tho, which is fine work

Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
No logic whatsoever.

Likely scenario: small medical-style bottle used to mix Novichok precursors then syringe used to apply to key through keyhole. Bottle etc dumped afterwards. Drug addict(s) find bottle, think it is methadone or similar and take it home to get high.

Note: no indication of source of agent as yet.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2018 9:43 pm
by morepork
Why would you need these mythical precursors to activate an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor? It is stable, non-flammable, and is not an oxidizer. Check out galantamine for a near as lookylikey. The MRS fingerprint is telling, so why this "I stumbled across it while looking for the white horse casually discarded on the street" nonsense? If someone has the source material then they are intimate with the source. I mean, fuck.

Re: Novichok 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2018 7:41 am
by Zhivago
morepork wrote:Why would you need these mythical precursors to activate an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor? It is stable, non-flammable, and is not an oxidizer. Check out galantamine for a near as lookylikey. The MRS fingerprint is telling, so why this "I stumbled across it while looking for the white horse casually discarded on the street" nonsense? If someone has the source material then they are intimate with the source. I mean, fuck.
Novichok is documented as being a binary weapon which means that the purpose of using precursors is to allow for safer transportation.

Indeed, now that the investigators have found the source, it would be a lot more credible if they were to id it to Russia (at least compared to before when they had no real proof, only suspicion).

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/ne ... chok-agent