Sharapova
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Sharapova
....bit unlucky, bit cheaty, or a bit daft?
She's been taking a drug (unlicensed outside Russia) called mildronate to 'regulate her heart', prescribed by 'the family doctor' for 10 years. This drug is also called meldonium, and was banned by WADA in January this year. Apparently she didn't know they were the same.
At face value, unlucky; however, you'd think she'd know to be careful or at least be better advised.
She's been taking a drug (unlicensed outside Russia) called mildronate to 'regulate her heart', prescribed by 'the family doctor' for 10 years. This drug is also called meldonium, and was banned by WADA in January this year. Apparently she didn't know they were the same.
At face value, unlucky; however, you'd think she'd know to be careful or at least be better advised.
-
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Sharapova
Whether a bit cheaty or a bit unlucky - it's crazy that one of the biggest names in the sport wouldn't have been advised that what she was taking was banned.Banquo wrote:....bit unlucky, bit cheaty, or a bit daft?
She's been taking a drug (unlicensed outside Russia) called mildronate to 'regulate her heart', prescribed by 'the family doctor' for 10 years. This drug is also called meldonium, and was banned by WADA in January this year. Apparently she didn't know they were the same.
At face value, unlucky; however, you'd think she'd know to be careful or at least be better advised.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: Sharapova
It also goes to show you how widespread performance enhancing drugs are in sport so I don't really feel sorry for anyone. She has been using a drug that has now been found to enhance her performance for 10 years, pretty much her entire career.
Just because she's ahead of the curve its OK, you fall behind the curve and you're a cheat. I have serious doubts her and her doctors didn't know it helped her before it got on the banned list. Seems to me you just have a bunch of athletes knowingly taking drugs just hoping to keep ahead of the ball.
Just because she's ahead of the curve its OK, you fall behind the curve and you're a cheat. I have serious doubts her and her doctors didn't know it helped her before it got on the banned list. Seems to me you just have a bunch of athletes knowingly taking drugs just hoping to keep ahead of the ball.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but hasn't she lived in Florida, USA since she was 7 yrs old? Meldonium has never been licensed by the FDA in the US, so you have to conclude that she either travels to Russia whenever she consults a "family doctor", or that something here stinks.
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sharapova
What does the drug do to enhance performance out of interest?jared_7 wrote:It also goes to show you how widespread performance enhancing drugs are in sport so I don't really feel sorry for anyone. She has been using a drug that has now been found to enhance her performance for 10 years, pretty much her entire career.
Just because she's ahead of the curve its OK, you fall behind the curve and you're a cheat. I have serious doubts her and her doctors didn't know it helped her before it got on the banned list. Seems to me you just have a bunch of athletes knowingly taking drugs just hoping to keep ahead of the ball.
-
- Posts: 612
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: Sharapova
Banquo wrote: What does the drug do to enhance performance out of interest?
http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2016/m ... drugs-test
• Meldonium is used to treat ischaemia: a lack of blood flow to parts of the body
• It is manufactured in Latvia and not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in the United States
• It increases blood flow, which improves exercise capacity in athletes
• Wada found “evidence of its use by athletes with the intention of enhancing performance”
• The decision to add meldonium to the banned list was approved on 16 September, 2015, and it came into effect on 1 January, 2016
• It is classed as an S4 substance under the Wada code, which addresses hormone and metabolic modulators
• A memo was sent out to athletes by Russia’s anti-doping agency last September informing them of the decision to ban its use
• Sharapova says she has been taking the drug for 10 years after she was regularly falling ill. She had a magnesium deficiency and family history of diabetes
• Fellow Russian athlete and Olympic gold medallist figure skater Ekaterina Bobrova admitted to testing positive to the drug on Monday
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sharapova
..at face value, and I'm not sure we should take it at this, it looks like they/she didnt know that mildronate was the same as meldonium.Renniks wrote:Whether a bit cheaty or a bit unlucky - it's crazy that one of the biggest names in the sport wouldn't have been advised that what she was taking was banned.Banquo wrote:....bit unlucky, bit cheaty, or a bit daft?
She's been taking a drug (unlicensed outside Russia) called mildronate to 'regulate her heart', prescribed by 'the family doctor' for 10 years. This drug is also called meldonium, and was banned by WADA in January this year. Apparently she didn't know they were the same.
At face value, unlucky; however, you'd think she'd know to be careful or at least be better advised.
It does seem incredible.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
It would seem to me that why she did not know that mildronate is the same as meldonium is the least of the questions. Bigger questions are:Banquo wrote:..at face value, and I'm not sure we should take it at this, it looks like they/she didnt know that mildronate was the same as meldonium.Renniks wrote:Whether a bit cheaty or a bit unlucky - it's crazy that one of the biggest names in the sport wouldn't have been advised that what she was taking was banned.Banquo wrote:....bit unlucky, bit cheaty, or a bit daft?
She's been taking a drug (unlicensed outside Russia) called mildronate to 'regulate her heart', prescribed by 'the family doctor' for 10 years. This drug is also called meldonium, and was banned by WADA in January this year. Apparently she didn't know they were the same.
At face value, unlucky; however, you'd think she'd know to be careful or at least be better advised.
It does seem incredible.
Who was prescribing it?
Why were they prescribing a drug designed to combat acute angina as a preventative medicine for magnesium deficiency?
-
- Posts: 18864
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Sharapova
dunnoStones of granite wrote:It would seem to me that why she did not know that mildronate is the same as meldonium is the least of the questions. Bigger questions are:Banquo wrote:..at face value, and I'm not sure we should take it at this, it looks like they/she didnt know that mildronate was the same as meldonium.Renniks wrote:
Whether a bit cheaty or a bit unlucky - it's crazy that one of the biggest names in the sport wouldn't have been advised that what she was taking was banned.
It does seem incredible.
Who was prescribing it?
Why were they prescribing a drug designed to combat acute angina as a preventative medicine for magnesium deficiency?

- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sharapova
An important question is whether she declared it on her medication declaration that all athletes must complete. If she has been doing so for 10 years and did so at the Aussie open when it was banned then I'll possibly believe she has required treatment from it and that increasing endurance was a happy side effect. Otherwise she's been pushing the envelope for years and is stupid not to have stopped once they finally banned it. I would have no sympathy at all in that case.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
Is there a requirement to do that if the medication is not on the WADA list?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:An important question is whether she declared it on her medication declaration that all athletes must complete. If she has been doing so for 10 years and did so at the Aussie open when it was banned then I'll possibly believe she has required treatment from it and that increasing endurance was a happy side effect. Otherwise she's been pushing the envelope for years and is stupid not to have stopped once they finally banned it. I would have no sympathy at all in that case.
- caldeyrfc
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:39 pm
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sharapova
Yes, so far as I can recall. You are required to list all the medication that you are on, precisely to avoid the "Oh but I was taking this but never realised" mitigation.Stones of granite wrote:Is there a requirement to do that if the medication is not on the WADA list?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:An important question is whether she declared it on her medication declaration that all athletes must complete. If she has been doing so for 10 years and did so at the Aussie open when it was banned then I'll possibly believe she has required treatment from it and that increasing endurance was a happy side effect. Otherwise she's been pushing the envelope for years and is stupid not to have stopped once they finally banned it. I would have no sympathy at all in that case.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:48 pm
Re: Sharapova
Brian Moore was saying on Twitter this morning that all pro athletes have to declare all medication they take.
If she didn't do that, well....
If she didn't do that, well....
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
I have a strong feeling he's wrong about that. As far as I can recall from my UKCC Coach training, the athlete has the responsibility to apply for a Therapeutic Use Exemption for any medication taken that is on the WADA list.
Happy to be proven wrong, though.
Happy to be proven wrong, though.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sharapova
Not talking about exemptions. It's probably only for the purposes of in-competition testing but when I had to do it 20 odd years ago it was all medication.Stones of granite wrote:I have a strong feeling he's wrong about that. As far as I can recall from my UKCC Coach training, the athlete has the responsibility to apply for a Therapeutic Use Exemption for any medication taken that is on the WADA list.
Happy to be proven wrong, though.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
Plus supplements or just medication?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Not talking about exemptions. It's probably only for the purposes of in-competition testing but when I had to do it 20 odd years ago it was all medication.Stones of granite wrote:I have a strong feeling he's wrong about that. As far as I can recall from my UKCC Coach training, the athlete has the responsibility to apply for a Therapeutic Use Exemption for any medication taken that is on the WADA list.
Happy to be proven wrong, though.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sharapova
Just medication. iirc.Stones of granite wrote:Plus supplements or just medication?Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Not talking about exemptions. It's probably only for the purposes of in-competition testing but when I had to do it 20 odd years ago it was all medication.Stones of granite wrote:I have a strong feeling he's wrong about that. As far as I can recall from my UKCC Coach training, the athlete has the responsibility to apply for a Therapeutic Use Exemption for any medication taken that is on the WADA list.
Happy to be proven wrong, though.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
Perhaps the protocols have changed, or there were additional protocols for that particular sport, but as far as I know WADA do not require athletes to register medications that are not on the prohibited list.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Just medication. iirc.Stones of granite wrote:Plus supplements or just medication?Eugene Wrayburn wrote: Not talking about exemptions. It's probably only for the purposes of in-competition testing but when I had to do it 20 odd years ago it was all medication.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Sharapova
I guess it's possible that I've misremembered my experience in athletics AND Brian Moore has made it up. It doesn't seem likely though.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Sharapova
Brian Moore in talking bollocks shocker....Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I guess it's possible that I've misremembered my experience in athletics AND Brian Moore has made it up. It doesn't seem likely though.
I don't think you're misremembering, I have a hazy memory of the protocols changing when WADA was set up and harmonised the anti-doping approach globally and across different sports. I'm sure that was a lot less than 20 years ago.
- cymroo
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:29 pm
Re: Sharapova
so while playing poorly for the past 10 years she's also been on performance enhancing drugs?
imagine how crap she'd have been without it!
imagine how crap she'd have been without it!
- belgarion
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:25 pm
- Location: NW England
Re: Sharapova
She couldn'y have been that crap shw won 4 Grand Slam titles US 2006, Aus 2008 & French 2012 & 2014cymroo wrote:so while playing poorly for the past 10 years she's also been on performance enhancing drugs?
imagine how crap she'd have been without it!
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Sharapova
The ITV 4 team covering the French Open are, in my opinion, the best set of pundits on terrestrial tv.
It's been the same team for about 5/6 yrs now.....despite Inverdale, they are proper quality.
Fascinating stat from Jim Courier........Andy Murray is only the 10th player to have made the final of every grand slam event.
Obv'.....Jim also managed it.
It's been the same team for about 5/6 yrs now.....despite Inverdale, they are proper quality.
Fascinating stat from Jim Courier........Andy Murray is only the 10th player to have made the final of every grand slam event.
Obv'.....Jim also managed it.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9010
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Sharapova
I imagine it's been pretty common knowledge recently; with Rog becoming the 7th, then Rafa, then Novak...kk67 wrote:The ITV 4 team covering the French Open are, in my opinion, the best set of pundits on terrestrial tv.
It's been the same team for about 5/6 yrs now.....despite Inverdale, they are proper quality.
Fascinating stat from Jim Courier........Andy Murray is only the 10th player to have made the final of every grand slam event.
Obv'.....Jim also managed it.