RugbyRebels

Enjoy.

Jesus. I can’t actually see the video here but am I going to be forced to choose who is the bigger prick of Neil and Shapiro?

Mikey Brown wrote:Jesus. I can’t actually see the video here but am I going to be forced to choose who is the bigger prick of Neil and Shapiro?

You really have to watch the video. Load it up when you get home.

What a fucking whiny little bitch. Utterly unprepared for an informed dialogue. A product of the snowflake safe place of social media. I detest these cunting pseudo intellectual spunk rags masquerading as authority by talking complete shit wearing a faux outrage mask. What manner of wooden dildo would take these human anal warts seriously?

morepork wrote:What a fucking whiny little bitch. Utterly unprepared for an informed dialogue. A product of the snowflake safe place of social media. I detest these cunting pseudo intellectual spunk rags masquerading as authority by talking complete shit wearing a faux outrage mask. What manner of wooden dildo would take these human anal warts seriously?

ironic, because he normally protests to be utterly anti snowflake and safe space and does in real life, as it were. A campaigner against no platforming, he no platforms the interviewer, lol.

twitchy wrote:

Mikey Brown wrote:Jesus. I can’t actually see the video here but am I going to be forced to choose who is the bigger prick of Neil and Shapiro?

You really have to watch the video. Load it up when you get home.

Fair enough, I did enjoy that in the end. I’d love to see what lead up to that point, but winding up Ben Shapiro like that by any means is fine by me.

Also, seems relevant;

Why is this interview getting any news? It's appalling!

Neil is an abysmal interviewer. He has a "set list" and cannot possibly deviate from it because he doesn't have the wit!

And to think, 15 years ago, I liked him!!! Jesus, I was a right cwnt.

Stom wrote:Why is this interview getting any news? It's appalling!

Neil is an abysmal interviewer. He has a "set list" and cannot possibly deviate from it because he doesn't have the wit!

And to think, 15 years ago, I liked him!!! Jesus, I was a right cwnt.

If you think looks bad here..........

twitchy wrote:

Stom wrote:Why is this interview getting any news? It's appalling!

Neil is an abysmal interviewer. He has a "set list" and cannot possibly deviate from it because he doesn't have the wit!

And to think, 15 years ago, I liked him!!! Jesus, I was a right cwnt.

If you think looks bad here..........

Oh I know. When I was back in the UK last, I watched some Daily Politics or whatever it's called now, and he's simply an obnoxious twat.

But his interview skills are what's lacking here.

Stom wrote:

twitchy wrote:

Stom wrote:Why is this interview getting any news? It's appalling!

Neil is an abysmal interviewer. He has a "set list" and cannot possibly deviate from it because he doesn't have the wit!

And to think, 15 years ago, I liked him!!! Jesus, I was a right cwnt.

If you think looks bad here..........

Oh I know. When I was back in the UK last, I watched some Daily Poli tics or whatever it's called now, and he's simply an obnoxious twat.

But his interview skills are what's lacking here.

I would disagree. Shapiro isn't used to having to answer actual taxing questions. He isn't a smart man. He can't defend his copy and paste "opinions" from his book. He just bullies first year university students by talking over them. His whole shtick disintegrates under actual legitimate questioning. He is just all hot air like most of the alt right.

He lost all credibility in this interview because he reacted emotionally to being humiliated intellectually which is what he constantly claims he does with "sjw's". All his catch phrases "facts don't care about your feelings", "triggered" etc now apply to him.

He and his ilk are very good at the gish gallop, which can often overwhelm or exasperate the poeple he's debating against, because FUUUUUUCK having to deal with that bullshit.

People need to really take notes from the Zizek v. Beef Bitch debate or Andrew Neil going to town on Smol Ben - they pretty much wait for these blathering fucks to stop blathering, and then take them to task over their statements, like Zizek demanding Peterson identify one of the Marxists he's constantly crying about, or Neil pretty much calling that little hobgoblin a whiny little shit who doesn't know what he's talking about. And really, the best way to deal with it is to go "thank you for demonstrating you know shit about fuck, now explain concisely why you think Arabs enjoy living in sewage or women should be executed for having an abortion" etc.

Stom wrote:Why is this interview getting any news? It's appalling!

Neil is an abysmal interviewer. He has a "set list" and cannot possibly deviate from it because he doesn't have the wit!

And to think, 15 years ago, I liked him!!! Jesus, I was a right cwnt.

As a professional question asker, that's a brilliant interview. He did exactly the reverse of the thing that Shapiro accused him of in that he didn't just shout slogans at himand say "What's your answer". He put questions fairly and listened to answers and built on the answers (on the rare occasions they came) to bring clarity to the interviewee's position. Where no answer came he highlighted that there had been no answer and then moved on. When he was attacked he calmly and without anger deflected it. I really don't understand what you can be looking for in an interview if you think this was appalling. And I say that whilst agreeing that yes, by and large, Andrew Neil is a right cwnt. But he's a good interviewer who'll give you plenty of opportunity to answer but not necessarily give you the questions you want.

You seem to be a target for hateful young American idiots like this in the UK and Ireland. That idiot Candice Owens attempting to use Hitler a metaphor for good nationalism over there being a recent example. Every time they get put into an open field in the sunlight away from home they seem to get horribly exposed for being pretty uninformed and incredibly poorly prepared. They wouldn't exist if it weren't for the internet, and by fuck they are very bad at what they do.

morepork wrote:You seem to be a target for hateful young American idiots like this in the UK and Ireland. That idiot Candice Owens attempting to use Hitler a metaphor for good nationalism over there being a recent example. Every time they get put into an open field in the sunlight away from home they seem to get horribly exposed for being pretty uninformed and incredibly poorly prepared. They wouldn't exist if it weren't for the internet, and by fuck they are very bad at what they do.

It's another market for them to generate money through their fuckwittery. They also get to pretend that the UK is a genuine cautionary tale of people "overrun" with Islam with assholes like Farage and Hopkins quite happy to take a fee to make up lies on Fox.

I'm generally not in favour of parents smacking their children. But every so often I see an interview and I think there may be an argument for it...

Never heard from Shapiro before, don't really see any need to listen to him further either. Not a great interview, but in this instance that's not the man in the wig, and rather it's how the producers on so many shows set up interviews with their research

Digby wrote:Never heard from Shapiro before, don't really see any need to listen to him further either. Not a great interview, but in this instance that's not the man in the wig, and rather it's how the producers on so many shows set up interviews with their research

Smol Ben is there to provide a respectable (relatively speaking) face to fash scum, and he has absolutely been prominent in that scene. And unlike, say, Baked Alaska, he's a true believer, rather than one of the grifters that latch on to that scene like a parasite.

Fuckin' squeaky little cunt...

morepork wrote:Fuckin' squeaky little cunt...

Screen Shot 2019-06-24 at 3.28.41 PM.png

Funny... it's exactly how the Mafia would react too.

I'm no international lawyer, but I have a feeling that disproportionate responses are a war crime.

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm no international lawyer, but I have a feeling that disproportionate responses are a war crime.

Israel would (presumably) disagree; not to mention that all of the USA's invasions have been disproportionate

Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'm no international lawyer, but I have a feeling that disproportionate responses are a war crime.

You are correct.