Faletau injury again?
Moderator: Sandydragon
-
- Posts: 2478
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
- Location: Haute-Garonne
Re: Faletau injury again?
Tough news but not to worry, the versatile Ken Owens can take his place!
- Graigwen
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am
Re: Faletau injury again?
francoisfou wrote:Tough news but not to worry, the versatile Ken Owens can take his place!
Well yes, that does raise a smile. However Owens cannot provide the technical skills Faletau provides (otherwise known as clearing up the mess at the back of our scrum). Moriarty gives a different more brutal approach and Navidi is pretty good technically, but Faletau has turned bad possession into good so many times that we are a much lesser team without him.
.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Faletau injury again?
Another broken arm?? Is it the same one?
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Faletau injury again?
Exactly, all articles seem to have failed to make a note of this from the ones I've read.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Another broken arm?? Is it the same one?
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.
- Graigwen
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am
Re: Faletau injury again?
Numbers wrote:Exactly, all articles seem to have failed to make a note of this from the ones I've read.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Another broken arm?? Is it the same one?
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.
Agreed, it is frustrating. The whole business is confusing as I thought no problem was apparent during the game.
.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Faletau injury again?
Bollocks. That would explain his omission from the six nations squad.
- Graigwen
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:25 am
Re: Faletau injury again?
Sandydragon wrote:Bollocks. That would explain his omission from the six nations squad.
Apparently it was going to be a 40 player squad but was reduced to 39 at the last moment. (Odd, as I thought squad numbers were limited by 6N rules?).
.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10466
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Faletau injury again?
RWC squads are limited, but I don’t think 6N ones are.Graigwen wrote:Sandydragon wrote:Bollocks. That would explain his omission from the six nations squad.
Apparently it was going to be a 40 player squad but was reduced to 39 at the last moment. (Odd, as I thought squad numbers were limited by 6N rules?).
.
He only positive is that it gives someone else a run in a position where we know we have a class operator. But in a 6N where we want to do well leading into a REC, losing a world class player is really disappointing.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9042
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Faletau injury again?
It's supposed to be a small crack around one of the screws holding the plate in. May not even have happened during the match, and may not have caused anything beyond a mild ache in and of itself (probably didn't, given the early comments about him coming through unscathed)Numbers wrote:Exactly, all articles seem to have failed to make a note of this from the ones I've read.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Another broken arm?? Is it the same one?
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.
- Numbers
- Posts: 2480
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am
Re: Faletau injury again?
Thanks for the update.Which Tyler wrote:It's supposed to be a small crack around one of the screws holding the plate in. May not even have happened during the match, and may not have caused anything beyond a mild ache in and of itself (probably didn't, given the early comments about him coming through unscathed)Numbers wrote:Exactly, all articles seem to have failed to make a note of this from the ones I've read.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Another broken arm?? Is it the same one?
Nightmare - although at least it's not a joint injury, could be worse.