Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

jngf wrote:
Banquo wrote:Not sure I like the jj as blind side wing thing. Too many backs end up in unfamiliar places
He doesn’t quite have the top end gas for that role imo.
You don’t understand what that role was then.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

Gauzere's not helped the front rows with the complete lack of any rhythm to the scrum instructions
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

Pretty unconvincing 2nd. half.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

Galfon wrote:Pretty unconvincing 2nd. half.
Looked like we just wanted a defending training drill.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1596
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by jngf »

England win but boy do they make it look dull
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12248
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mikey Brown »

Galfon wrote:Hard Dunn-by.. :(
I just don't get it. A personal vendetta against him by Jones is genuinely the most logical conclusion I can come to. We know LCD picks up injuries pretty frequently. Why not actually take a serious look at the next guy?
Danno
Posts: 2698
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Danno »

Idk why we don't just play 12 forwards, Youngs, Faz and May
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

I find a defence like that pretty entertaining. Outstanding defence!

Also I thought we didn’t compete at the breakdown? ;)
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4297
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Galfon »

FT Eng 18 - 7 Ire
Much tougher test. Excellent defence, but no tries 2nd half, hence no BP. Workmanlike+.
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2476
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Yeah, good to see some improvement. Ireland aren't a bad side so a decent day at the office, rackon.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Raggs »

Little time with ball in hand in attacking positions but loved seeing us attack from our own 22.

Phenomenal defence and we're clearly approaching the breakdown differently with a lot of players having a bite and forcing opposition to commit players.

Enjoyed that.
Danno
Posts: 2698
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Danno »

Pundits saying our back row made 74 tackles, missing 0.
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:I find a defence like that pretty entertaining. Outstanding defence!

Also I thought we didn’t compete at the breakdown? ;)
Lolz. Quite a few myths debunked today!!

Youngs resorted to type and Faz was poor. Penalties an issue.

But sort of odd to not have much ball but feel you are on the front fooot!
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

I know Willis can feel slightly hard done by, but jeez Underhill, Curry and Earl were all outstanding.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Raggs »

If Willis couldn't train for me its the right call and that's coming as one of Willis' biggest fans.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by 16th man »

Banquo wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:I find a defence like that pretty entertaining. Outstanding defence!

Also I thought we didn’t compete at the breakdown? ;)
Lolz. Quite a few myths debunked today!!

Youngs resorted to type and Faz was poor. Penalties an issue.

But sort of odd to not have much ball but feel you are on the front fooot!
The blitz defence was excellent. Helped by Ireland not trying the chip until after 70 minutes.
fivepointer
Posts: 5930
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by fivepointer »

Cant fault our defensive effort.
Well done to May on his tries.
And that was enough to win despite losing line outs, giving away a stream of penalties, losing the 2nd half and displaying virtually nothing in attack in the second period.
We establish dominance and then coast along while out opponents catch up - see Wales and Ireland at home in the 6N's.
Its just a bit....unsatisfying.
Another absolutely shit trend is giving Tom Dunn less than 2 minutes at the end of a game.
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:Little time with ball in hand in attacking positions but loved seeing us attack from our own 22.

Phenomenal defence and we're clearly approaching the breakdown differently with a lot of players having a bite and forcing opposition to commit players.

Enjoyed that.
Agree with the first two parts. I didn’t enjoy the penalties or a lot of our half back play; the pack was phenomenal generally, though concentration at set piece time was lacking sometime, Jamie’s arrows a bit off. May done well, being a full time openside is hard work! Lawrence did ok, not much else happening in the backs.
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

16th man wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:I find a defence like that pretty entertaining. Outstanding defence!

Also I thought we didn’t compete at the breakdown? ;)
Lolz. Quite a few myths debunked today!!

Youngs resorted to type and Faz was poor. Penalties an issue.

But sort of odd to not have much ball but feel you are on the front fooot!
The blitz defence was excellent. Helped by Ireland not trying the chip until after 70 minutes.
They did work one earlier, so have to question who was sweeping
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Epaminondas Pules wrote:I know Willis can feel slightly hard done by, but jeez Underhill, Curry and Earl were all outstanding.
Billy worked his socks off too, almost literally, huge tackle count for him.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12248
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Mikey Brown »

Danno wrote:Pundits saying our back row made 74 tackles, missing 0.
Fat, small, slow, lazy and out of position but 74 tackles is good.
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:If Willis couldn't train for me its the right call and that's coming as one of Willis' biggest fans.
He’s got some work to do , but clearly has incentivised the incumbents to work harder!
I’d play him ahead of Underhill. But he needs to get past Earl too.
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Nov 21, 2020 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3451
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Banquo wrote:
Epaminondas Pules wrote:I know Willis can feel slightly hard done by, but jeez Underhill, Curry and Earl were all outstanding.
Billy worked his socks off too, almost literally, huge tackle count for him.
Absolutely. He was excellent in several facets.
JellyHead
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:38 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by JellyHead »

Our ability to consistently make ground without the ball is amazing.
Banquo
Posts: 19354
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Eng v. Ire - Match thread

Post by Banquo »

JellyHead wrote:Our ability to consistently make ground without the ball is amazing.
Yep. Front foot without the ball is a great start point!
Post Reply