Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19272
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Ford has a ruptured achilles. He'll be out for months.
I said to my missus that's what he'd done- had a similar one in the same way in my mid 20's, though not a 'rupture'. Him trying to walk on it won't have helped.
I have been present (at squash matches) when two people have snapped achilles tendons. Neither could possibly have walked a single step. Both believed they had been struck from behind, such was the impactful nature of the injury occurring.

Ford's 'rupture' is presumably a partial tear, certainly a nasty injury.

Is rugby unique in allowing seriously injured players to hobble off? The practice ought to be reviewed before somebody gets sued for contributory negligence.
Agreed on all fronts!
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17789
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Puja »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Ford has a ruptured achilles. He'll be out for months.
I said to my missus that's what he'd done- had a similar one in the same way in my mid 20's, though not a 'rupture'. Him trying to walk on it won't have helped.
I have been present (at squash matches) when two people have snapped achilles tendons. Neither could possibly have walked a single step. Both believed they had been struck from behind, such was the impactful nature of the injury occurring.

Ford's 'rupture' is presumably a partial tear, certainly a nasty injury.

Is rugby unique in allowing seriously injured players to hobble off? The practice ought to be reviewed before somebody gets sued for contributory negligence.
I've always thought that. There is a culture of "No, I'm fine, I can tough it out and walk off myself" (it was a mark of how bad Ford's injury was that he even allowed himself to be helped), and it surely exacerbates injuries. Needs changing.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Numbers
Posts: 2504
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:13 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Numbers »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Ford has a ruptured achilles. He'll be out for months.
I said to my missus that's what he'd done- had a similar one in the same way in my mid 20's, though not a 'rupture'. Him trying to walk on it won't have helped.
I have been present (at squash matches) when two people have snapped achilles tendons. Neither could possibly have walked a single step. Both believed they had been struck from behind, such was the impactful nature of the injury occurring.

Ford's 'rupture' is presumably a partial tear, certainly a nasty injury.

Is rugby unique in allowing seriously injured players to hobble off? The practice ought to be reviewed before somebody gets sued for contributory negligence.
Yeah, it won't be a snapped tendon, is it the same leg as last time?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14576
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Mellsblue »

Imagine how many would’ve watched if it had been an entertaining match!

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/p ... ble-season
fivepointer
Posts: 5923
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by fivepointer »

Penny has finally dropped that the Premiership (and rugby in general) needs free to air tv coverage to reach a bigger audience and grow.
Who'd have thought it?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:Imagine how many would’ve watched if it had been an entertaining match!

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/p ... ble-season
Do the massive differences (on the two channels) between average and peak audiences indicate how boring the match was as a spectacle or is that degree of variation normal?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6415
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Oakboy »

fivepointer wrote:Penny has finally dropped that the Premiership (and rugby in general) needs free to air tv coverage to reach a bigger audience and grow.
Who'd have thought it?
Agreed but is there/will there be any free to air TV? Without getting into political debate, will the BBC/licence fee situation continue or will everything switch to a form of pay-per-view? I just hope the rugby authorities keep everything under review rather than just short-term cash benefits.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14576
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Imagine how many would’ve watched if it had been an entertaining match!

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/p ... ble-season
Do the massive differences (on the two channels) between average and peak audiences indicate how boring the match was as a spectacle or is that degree of variation normal?
Absolutely no idea.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14576
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Mellsblue »

fivepointer wrote:Penny has finally dropped that the Premiership (and rugby in general) needs free to air tv coverage to reach a bigger audience and grow.
Who'd have thought it?
Striking the right balance between coin and eyeballs is every minor sport’s issue. Massie-Taylor seems to have done more in six months than his predecessors ever managed, IMO.
FKAS
Posts: 8522
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by FKAS »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Imagine how many would’ve watched if it had been an entertaining match!

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/p ... ble-season
Do the massive differences (on the two channels) between average and peak audiences indicate how boring the match was as a spectacle or is that degree of variation normal?
I'd expect fairly normal. Plenty of people might skip the pre or post match sections of the show or knowing it was close tune in for the final twenty minutes etc. I don't know the rugby detail but when I've seen TV coverage numbers previously there's normally a jump from average to peak viewers.

Agree about the free to air aspect and the impact of the new chairman. It's the right way to go about it. Rugby is a niche sport, it's not football, we need to make it more available to people to pull them in.

Tinds on his podcast made a good point about the Baabaas game on Sunday. Top tiers of Twickers not open, why were those tickets not given to community sports clubs? Why not have deals through grassroots clubs where when the club buys them you get two free children's tickets for every adult. Pack the place out. RFU missed a chance there.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17789
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Puja »

FKAS wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Imagine how many would’ve watched if it had been an entertaining match!

https://www.premiershiprugby.com/news/p ... ble-season
Do the massive differences (on the two channels) between average and peak audiences indicate how boring the match was as a spectacle or is that degree of variation normal?
I'd expect fairly normal. Plenty of people might skip the pre or post match sections of the show or knowing it was close tune in for the final twenty minutes etc. I don't know the rugby detail but when I've seen TV coverage numbers previously there's normally a jump from average to peak viewers.

Agree about the free to air aspect and the impact of the new chairman. It's the right way to go about it. Rugby is a niche sport, it's not football, we need to make it more available to people to pull them in.

Tinds on his podcast made a good point about the Baabaas game on Sunday. Top tiers of Twickers not open, why were those tickets not given to community sports clubs? Why not have deals through grassroots clubs where when the club buys them you get two free children's tickets for every adult. Pack the place out. RFU missed a chance there.
Mind, having watched that Barbarians game, I'd say that was bullet dodged rather than opportunity missed.

Puja
Backist Monk
FKAS
Posts: 8522
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by FKAS »

Puja wrote:
FKAS wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Do the massive differences (on the two channels) between average and peak audiences indicate how boring the match was as a spectacle or is that degree of variation normal?
I'd expect fairly normal. Plenty of people might skip the pre or post match sections of the show or knowing it was close tune in for the final twenty minutes etc. I don't know the rugby detail but when I've seen TV coverage numbers previously there's normally a jump from average to peak viewers.

Agree about the free to air aspect and the impact of the new chairman. It's the right way to go about it. Rugby is a niche sport, it's not football, we need to make it more available to people to pull them in.

Tinds on his podcast made a good point about the Baabaas game on Sunday. Top tiers of Twickers not open, why were those tickets not given to community sports clubs? Why not have deals through grassroots clubs where when the club buys them you get two free children's tickets for every adult. Pack the place out. RFU missed a chance there.
Mind, having watched that Barbarians game, I'd say that was bullet dodged rather than opportunity missed.

Puja
Lots of tries, sun out. Great chance for kids to visit Twickers who might not otherwise have the chance. Result doesn't really matter.
Danno
Posts: 2673
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: Prem Final Tigers Vs Sarries

Post by Danno »

fivepointer wrote:Penny has finally dropped that the Premiership (and rugby in general) needs free to air tv coverage to reach a bigger audience and grow.
Who'd have thought it?
It was bonkers not to have the semis on FTA as well. Maybe next year.
Post Reply