terror attack in Westminster

WaspInWales
Posts: 4503
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: terror attack in Westminster

Post by WaspInWales »

jared_7 wrote:
WaspInWales wrote: I don't get why the link between invading/bombing the crap out of countries and extremism isn't debated more?
I assume thats a rhetorical question? Its a bit like a Russian asking why RT doesn't question Vlad more, why Fox is partisan or why the North Korean Daily Telegraph hasn't investigated Kin Jong Un's psychopathic tendencies.
Yes, it was rhetorical, but it would still be nice if some MSM commentators broached the idea of policy as the causation of terrorism, as opposed to the tired 'attack on democracy' route.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: terror attack in Westminster

Post by morepork »

WaspInWales wrote:
jared_7 wrote:
WaspInWales wrote: I don't get why the link between invading/bombing the crap out of countries and extremism isn't debated more?
I assume thats a rhetorical question? Its a bit like a Russian asking why RT doesn't question Vlad more, why Fox is partisan or why the North Korean Daily Telegraph hasn't investigated Kin Jong Un's psychopathic tendencies.
Yes, it was rhetorical, but it would still be nice if some MSM commentators broached the idea of policy as the causation of terrorism, as opposed to the tired 'attack on democracy' route.

It is indeed the font line of the 4th estate, I agree. The media need some warrior poets to bring this painfully obvious connection to the forefront of dialogue, and eventually to the foreign policy table. I would like to think that the upcoming generation are getting appropriate exposure to cause and consequence so recent and so obvious that it is voiced on a rugby forum that includes Len and used to have Beef. If we can see it, it can't be too fucking hard to see.
User avatar
Len
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm

Re: terror attack in Westminster

Post by Len »

morepork wrote:
WaspInWales wrote:
jared_7 wrote:
I assume thats a rhetorical question? Its a bit like a Russian asking why RT doesn't question Vlad more, why Fox is partisan or why the North Korean Daily Telegraph hasn't investigated Kin Jong Un's psychopathic tendencies.
Yes, it was rhetorical, but it would still be nice if some MSM commentators broached the idea of policy as the causation of terrorism, as opposed to the tired 'attack on democracy' route.

It is indeed the font line of the 4th estate, I agree. The media need some warrior poets to bring this painfully obvious connection to the forefront of dialogue, and eventually to the foreign policy table. I would like to think that the upcoming generation are getting appropriate exposure to cause and consequence so recent and so obvious that it is voiced on a rugby forum that includes Len and used to have Beef. If we can see it, it can't be too fucking hard to see.
Thanks bro :lol:

Your generation has produced some of the biggest shit cunts walking around though. Say what you will about bearded hipsters, but at least they're not racist orange fuckwits that live in Spain and complain about the EU.
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: terror attack in Westminster

Post by morepork »

I've got this picture of sun burned wombles eating fish and chips in my head.
Post Reply